What's new

MUSLIM CONQUESTS ON THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT-

The Muslim conquest of Bengal is a unique one and should not be stringed together with the rest of the subcontinent. @asad71 can shed some light on this. Islam entered Arakan from the very get go.

This is why there is a book dedicated to this topic by Professor Richard Eaton.

Bengal also received Islam through Awliyas who established independent kingdoms such as Jalalabadm and Iqlim e Muazzamabad. In fact every region in BD has a different history.
 
.
Ahem ahem .We cant have Sikhs,Muslims Christians ,Hindus ,Qadianis etc masquerading as Muslims on the premier number one Pakistani forum can we ?
(its like me pretending to be a undercover Hindu on forum ) Deceit


In 1974, after an exhaustive examination of all the evidence presented for and against the Qadianis, the Muslim World League (Rabita Alame Islami) -- which represents all religious scholars from every Muslim country of the world -- passed an unanimous resolution declaring the Qadiani Movement and its leadership out of the fold of Islam. Indeed, "Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam" is a man-made organization with no divine authority or guidance.

LOL you pretend like Ahmadis parachuted in to these areas from another planet. Who were my ancestors less than a hundred years ago? I was specifically talking about my Paternal and Maternal family both of whom accepted Islam because of Sufi saints, one of who's name includes a title given specifically to descendants of Sufi saints. (i.e. Khawaja)
 
.
Ahem ahem .We cant have Sikhs,Muslims Christians ,Hindus ,Qadianis etc masquerading as Muslims on the premier number one Pakistani forum can we ?
(its like me pretending to be a undercover Hindu on forum ) Deceit


In 1974, after an exhaustive examination of all the evidence presented for and against the Qadianis, the Muslim World League (Rabita Alame Islami) -- which represents all religious scholars from every Muslim country of the world -- passed an unanimous resolution declaring the Qadiani Movement and its leadership out of the fold of Islam. Indeed, "Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam" is a man-made organization with no divine authority or guidance.

I don't care what a terrorist like you thinks about me, If a terrorist thinks I'm a kafir but Taliban and ISIS are Muslims, I'll be a kafir then.
 
.
1. Lack of unity
2.No central power
3.North Indian kingdoms were busy fighting over trivial things
4.Tactical mindset instead of Strategic thinking.
5. Cast-ism.
6. More emphasis on personal valor rather than comprehensive strategic planing and execution.

..
in addition ...
Many (but not all) Indian kingdoms had evolved in their civilization a lot more than the barbaric muslim invaders resulting in rules and traditions of fighting wars which simply did not make sense.
 
.
India today would have completely converted to Islam, has it been spread across the continent more by peace rather than confrontations. Just like how India was entirely Buddhist once upon a time.

And Similarly how Indonesia, Philippines and Khmer formerly Hindu/Buddhists converted to Islam.

These so called great Ghazis came here only for loot and had nothing but utter contempt for locals whether Muslim or Hindu.

For instance, in the entire period of presence of Islamic empires in the subcontinent from 711 to 1320 of roughly 600 years there was only one local Indian Muslim Malik Kafur who gained a high position, this was again due to his relations with Khilji.

Only under the Mughals locals were allowed to be part the ruling class, by martial alliances with Rajputs for example.

Also, most of these invaders fought amonst themeselves and ended up slaughtering eachother:
The Umayudd presence in Sindh was exterminated by Ghaznis.
The Ghaznis were exterminated by Ghurids.
The Ghurids were exterminated by khwarezmian empire.
The Delhi Sultanate was destroyed due to Timurid invasion.
Babur destroyed the Lodi Dynasty.
Mughals under Aurangazeb destroyed the Shia Bijapur Sultanate, which brought them into direct confrontation with the Marathas, and the rest is history.

In this entire period there were no scientific inventions when compared to the Europe or China.

Europe went on with its Industrial revolution and later took over rest of the world.

The was some limited scientific activity during the Mughals, however nothing compared to achievements under pre-Islamic empire.
 
. .
in addition ...
Many (but not all) Indian kingdoms had evolved in their civilization a lot more than the barbaric muslim invaders resulting in rules and traditions of fighting wars which simply did not make sense.
yes. Not fighting after sun set was the stupidest things !
 
.
LOL you pretend like Ahmadis parachuted in to these areas from another planet. Who were my ancestors less than a hundred years ago? I was specifically talking about my Paternal and Maternal family both of whom accepted Islam because of Sufi saints, one of who's name includes a title given specifically to descendants of Sufi saints. (i.e. Khawaja)

I pretend :D
Stop Lie :rofl:


We South Asian Muslims
keep the Deen away from these blood thirsty rulers ....... you said .

I don't care what a terrorist like you thinks about me, If a terrorist thinks I'm a kafir but Taliban and ISIS are Muslims, I'll be a kafir then.

a terrorist now :D
the whole world Muslims be they sunni,shia etc etc have declared you lot as Kafir (out of the fold of Islam ) but hey your right :partay:


Qadiani Cult buit on Deception
 
.
Not his, btw; the silly bugger just doesn't get it that he has to attribute the post, if it is not his.
I think the article well written but he did not provide the source thus difficult to read the details.
 
.
Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the 12th to the 16th centuries, though earlier Muslim conquests made limited inroads into modern Afghanistan and Pakistan as early as the time of the Rajput kingdoms in the 8th century. With the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, Islam spread across large parts of the subcontinent. In 1204, Bakhtiar Khilji led the Muslim conquest of Bengal, marking the eastern-most expansion of Islam at the time.

Prior to the rise of the Maratha Empire which was followed by the conquest of India by the British East India Company, the Muslim Moghul Empire was able to annex or subjugate most of India's Hindu kings. However, it was never able to conquer the Hindu kingdoms in upper reaches of the Himalayas such as the regions of today's Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Nepal and Bhutan and the extreme south of India such as Travancore.

BACKGROUND-

Like other societies in history, South Asia has been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must also note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes from Central Asia who arrived from the North West. With the fall of the Sassanids and the arrival of the Caliphate's domination of the region these tribes began to contest with the new power and were subsequently integrated into it giving rise to Muslim dynasties of Central Asian heritage, generally Turkic -Persians. In that sense, the Muslim invasions of the 10th century onwards were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions in the History of Central Asia during the 1st through to the 6th century. What does however, make the Muslim invasions different is that unlike the preceding invaders who assimilated into the prevalent social system, the Muslim conquerors retained their Islamic identity and created new legal and administrative systems that challenged and usually superseded the existing systems of social conduct and ethics. They also introduced new cultural mores that in some ways were very different from the existing cultural codes. While this was often a source of friction and conflict, it should also be noted that there were also Muslim rulers, notably Akbar, who in much of their secular practice absorbed or accommodated local traditions.

The first incursion by the new Muslim successor states of the Arab World occurred around 664 CE during theUmayyad Caliphate, led by Al Muhallab ibn Abi Suffrahtowards Multan in Southern Punjab, in modern day Pakistan. Muhallab's expeditions were not aimed at conquest, though they penetrated only as far as the capital of the Maili, he returned with wealth and prisoners of war. This was an Arab incursion and part of the early Umayyad push onwards from the Islamic conquest of Persia into Central Asia, and within the limits of the eastern borders of previous Persian empires. The last Arab push in the region would be towards the end of Umayyad reign underMuhammad bin Qasim, after whom the Arabs would be defeated by the south Indian Emperor Vikramaditya IIof the Chalukya dynasty and the Rajputs like Nagabhata of the Pratihara Dynasty at the Battle of Rajasthan in 738, and Muslim incursions would only be resumed under later Turkic and Central Asian Mongol dynasties with more local capitals, who supplanted the Caliphate and expanded their domains both northwards and eastwards.

It took several centuries for Islam to spread across India and how it did so is a topic of intense debate.

Excellent article but too little details.

Not his, btw; the silly bugger just doesn't get it that he has to attribute the post, if it is not his.

This is where it appears to have been copied & pasted from :

http://fileserver.net-texts.com/asset.aspx?dl=no&id=6234
 
. .
First of all define Indian Subcontinent and India here...Are we talking about India as a country which exists now? Are we talking about Indian landmass? Are we talking about India consisting of Pakistan and Bangladesh? Are we talking about 19th Century Inida? are we talking about british time india? are we talking about ancient India? Are we talking about Indus Valley civilization ? Are we talking about Harappa civilization?
 
.
The title of this thread should be changed to "The Turkic invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan and some parts
of north India."
 
.
Back
Top Bottom