Muslim and Hindu leaders who were loyalists of British Empire

[Indrani]

No, they were just anti-BJP but pro-India

this dude is behaving like indian lion (member who used to post anti-hindu comments using indian flag)

This guy is pro-India too. In fact he is a proponent of Akhand Bharat and regrets partitioning of India. Only his version of Akhand Bharat is reestablishment of the caliphate and where Hindu limbs and blood will be sacrificed to establish supremacy of Islam over the West too.

 

[wolfschanzze]

Against principles of Islam. So no.

We Muslims aren't converting millions of Hindus into Islam like the Christians. You should be focusing on that. You already have lost South-India to Christian missionaries.

You bigots don't even to listen. You want to blindly bas Muslims and Islam. Hindus have a bigger threat from Zionists and Christians who made Hindus and Muslims fight while Christians started to take advantaged in the background. So many poor Hindus and Muslims while Christians are only getting richer and richer.

Listen to Rajiv Dixit ji maybe he can cure your Islamaphobia.

What is against Islamic Principles? this is not Islamic Country where sharia works.
Let us worry about christian Missionaries,while you stop you "Breeding" program and follow Same law as every citizen.

 

[Victory]

This guy is pro-India too. In fact he is a proponent of Akhand Bharat and regrets partitioning of India. Only his version of Akhand Bharat is reestablishment of the caliphate and where Hindu limbs and blood will be sacrificed to establish supremacy of Islam over the West too.

who cares iam an atheist

 

[wolfschanzze]

This guy is pro-India too. In fact he is a proponent of Akhand Bharat and regrets partitioning of India. Only his version of Akhand Bharat is reestablishment of the caliphate and where Hindu limbs and blood will be sacrificed to establish supremacy of Islam over the West too.

That will never happen India will only become Hindu rashtra , Sufficient Momentum has already picked up and it will only go forwards in future not backward as more Hindus become enlightened.

 

[scorpionx]

I cannot believe that Edwina was not a honey trap for Nehru. How idealistic the Bengali world view is and how much of a fool they take the rest of Indians to be. Edwina Mountbatten was a very very promiscuous lady with far too numerous affairs to her name for her to even consider things like platonic relationship. This kind of a cock and bull story was only wrapped and sold to the simpleton Indians to cover up for Nehru's betrayal of India.

White worship and slavery is down to the bone in Bengali people.

How the wild promiscuity of Edwina Mountbatten - wife of Prince Charles' mentor - took a heartbreaking toll on her children | Mail Online

Pardon moi, I am neither lower middle class nor conservative in the traditional sense in the least.

I am fully aware of the list. Neither your assumption nor the Daily Mail link in any way prove that Lady Mountbatten was a honey trap for Nehru. For me, this is over simplification of events that were far more complex and deserves deeper in sight. There is much much more shades in her character other than promiscuity if we really want to know who was she exactly. It is grave injustice to describe some one as honey trap, who despite being one of the richest women dies alone with just a pile of personal letters in her hand.

But this is my personal opinion and views may vary with an wide degree. And I don't want to ruin FaujHistorian's thread. So let the slaves live with their own imagination.

 

[Indrani]

That will never happen India will only become Hindu rashtra , Sufficient Momentum has already picked up and it will only go forwards in future not backward as more Hindus become enlightened.

Hope so. I was just explaining this guy's stand. In another thread he was threatening how Kerala, Kashmir, and WB will no longer be Hindu majority and lamenting how if India had not been partitioned, then in another decade or two, the subcontinent's population would have been overwhelmingly Muslim and this would have been the start of an Islamic caliphate.

 

[Chronos]

Hope so. I was just explaining this guy's stand. In another thread he was threatening how Kerala, Kashmir, and WB will no longer be Hindu majority and lamenting how if India had not been partitioned, then in another decade or two, the subcontinent's population would have been overwhelmingly Muslim and this would have been the start of an Islamic caliphate.

Well there is a caliphate in Iraq. Let him live there then.

 

[mujhaidind]

This guy is pro-India too. In fact he is a proponent of Akhand Bharat and regrets partitioning of India. Only his version of Akhand Bharat is reestablishment of the caliphate and where Hindu limbs and blood will be sacrificed to establish supremacy of Islam over the West too.

No you are too brainwashed to see the truth. India under calpihate would be the most powerful country in the world. Muslims never persecuted Hindus. History was edited by the British.

It was the European Christians who persecuted Hindus and forcefully converted them. But you too blind with your hate to see that. See for yourself how Indian Christians praise British and other Europeans for coloniazing India.

A fraud like Mother terressa(and a Hindu hater) is worshipped by you Hindus. What's there to say?

 

[wolfschanzze]

Hope so. I was just explaining this guy's stand. In another thread he was threatening how Kerala, Kashmir, and WB will no longer be Hindu majority and lamenting how if India had not been partitioned, then in another decade or two, the subcontinent's population would have been overwhelmingly Muslim and this would have been the start of an Islamic caliphate.

Here he wants Hindus to fight Christians while leaving Them to breed litters.His dreams will only remain dreams,Uniform Civil code once implemented will take care of such nuisances.

 

[mujhaidind]

Well there is a caliphate in Iraq. Let him live there then.

Shut up Indian Muslim hater! I am Indian by nationality why would I go to Iraq?

 

[wolfschanzze]

No you are too brainwashed to see the truth. India under calpihate would be the most powerful country in the world. Muslims never persecuted Hindus. History was edited by the British.

It was the European Christians who persecuted Hindus and forcefully converted them. But you too blind with your hate to see that. See for yourself how Indian Christians praise British and other Europeans for coloniazing India.

A fraud like Mother terressa(and a Hindu hater) is worshipped by you Hindus. What's there to say?

This is land of hindus not caliphate or muslim land, we gave Pakistan for Muslims, if you want sharia or caliphate go to 55+ islamic countries.

 

[mujhaidind]

Uniform Civil code once implemented will take care of such nuisances.

Will never happen. Christians will be the one who will be asking a sperate country in near future.

 

[Victory]

Anyways he is just a false flagger

probably trolling from his hut in lahore

 

[wolfschanzze]

Will never happen. Christians will be the one who will be asking a sperate country in near future.

What will never happen?Sharia and Caliphate yeah i agree with you they will never happen.
Leave it to us on how to deal with christian separatists.

 

[Indrani]

I am fully aware of the list. Neither your assumption nor the Daily Mail link in any way prove that Lady Mountbatten was a honey trap for Nehru. For me, this is over simplification of events that were far more complex and deserves deeper in sight. There is much much more shades in her character other than promiscuity if we really want to know who was she exactly. It is grave injustice to describe some one as honey trap, who despite being one of the richest women dies alone with just a pile of personal letters in her hand.
But this is my personal opinion and views may vary with an wide degree. And I don't want to ruin FaujHistorian's thread. So let the slaves live with their own imagination.

Ohhohoho. So now dying with a pile of letters in one's hand is a barometer of justice and injustice done? That also is a measure of what exclude someone from being an honey trap of course. That she was a poor wife, poor mother, lady without loyalty in her bone is of no consequence. We must go looking for shades in her character. Why because she handed out some doles in some relief camps?

Two extremely promiscuous shameless people in positions of power are of course all about platonic love and no that was of absolutely no consequence to India at all. How lowly of us lower middle class conservatives to think otherwise.

Of course slaves will continue to live with their own imagination. My interjections were for the non-slaves amongst us.