Musharraf's Coup Revived Pak Economy; Boosted Education, Human Development

[Shot-Caller]

You are entirely false. reality was exact opposite.

If he was so popular he would have stayed and contested in 2008 elections.

 

[OTTOMAN]

The reality was that this ex-SSG violated his blood oath and committed treason of the highest order by his coup. Please tell us how these facts can be denied.

The quoted SSG was not in Pakistan when Coup happened... get your facts right.

 

[New Resolve]

The reality was that this ex-SSG violated his blood oath and committed treason of the highest order by his coup. Please tell us how these facts can be denied.

Treason against whom, those who were raping and pillaging the country, grow up son.
Musharaff brought back the same scum he kicked out, that's what undid his good work.

 

[VCheng]

Asian Tigers became Asian Tigers under dictators before they became democratic.

Those dictators lasted for several decades, whereas all of Pakistan's dictators failed miserably in about one decade only, showing the falsehood in this logic. If dictators are so good, then why do they fail so soon in Pakistan? How many times have we seen this already?

 

[OTTOMAN]

If he was so popular he would have stayed and contested in 2008 elections.

2008 elections! wasn't he President.

 

[VCheng]

The quoted SSG was not in Pakistan when Coup happened... get your facts right.

LOL. He was the instigator of it all as the officer in command.

Treason against whom, those who were raping and pillaging the country, grow up son.
Musharaff brought back the same scum he kicked out, that's what undid his good work.

So why did this genius bring back the same scum he kicked out? Because he would do anything up to treason to remain in power.

 

[OTTOMAN]

Those dictators lasted for several decades, whereas all of Pakistan's dictators failed miserably in about one decade only, showing the falsehood in this logic. If dictators are so good, then why do they fail so soon in Pakistan? How many times have we seen this already?

Dictator!
What did he dictated?
It was true democracy.... local bodies govt.

LOL. He was the instigator of it all as the officer in command.

The interview of pilot suggest otherwise.

 

[VCheng]

Dictator!
What did he dictated?
It was true democracy.... local bodies govt.

So what election dd he win to gain power? Oh wait, a coup is what dictators do to usurp power.

 

[OTTOMAN]

So why did this genius bring back the same scum he kicked out? Because he would do anything up to treason to remain in power.

How come same scum is referred as democratic when Zardari is president and not when Musharraf is President?

So what election dd he win to gain power? Oh wait, a coup is what dictators do to usurp power.

So basically you have nothing to argue....
Just to answer your rhetoric, at least Musharraf held fair elections, it was upto people to reject him.
Of course you have no idea what local bodies govt. means...

 

[New Resolve]

LOL. He was the instigator of it all as the officer in command.



So why did this genius bring back the same scum he kicked out? Because he would do anything up to treason to remain in power.

Listened to the Americans too much, that can be a failing, i hope he's learned from it. He did a tremendous job in governance and uplifting our economy, the loosers you support wouldnt be able to do in a 100 years what he did in 7.

 

[Shot-Caller]

2008 elections! wasn't he President.

What happened to his legitimate political party?

 

[GreenGuy]

The reality was that this ex-SSG violated his blood oath and committed treason of the highest order by his coup. Please tell us how these facts can be denied.

So, judges didn't commit treason when they did not give punishment to a single terrorist for so many years?

Politicians didn't commit treason when they looted the country?

Judges didn't commit treason when they sided with political parties and influenced the cases?


A military man came to the power under his oath i.e to save country from inside and outside threats and everyone loses their minds.

 

[Hyde]

I totally disagree with your Mr Riaz Haq with all due respect. I really like your articles and also watched some of your videos but in my humble opinion it is the post-afghan war lift of sanctions which lead to economic growth in Pakistan. When Musharraf tookover the economy was still in shamble for the next 2 years and was on the verge of bankruptcy. It is the gift of USA which led to removal of sanctions and the package of economic aid lead to improvement in the worst economic circumstances of the history of Pakistan.

 

[GreenGuy]

Its not just Pakistan which receives aid from US in the whole world. Though i agree that the aid surely helped in putting the economy on right track.
But you can't really put that all on aid. It was the way how that aid money was spent which improved the economy.

We still get aid but the difference is clear.

 

[That Guy]

I think this is a bit misleading. It was not the coup that did anything, but rather the competence of a person. If anything, Musharraf showed that if one is even remotely competent, they can achieve a lot.

This can all be done under democratic institution, as long as the person in charge is competent.