Munawar Faruqui is not being bullied for his jokes, but for his faith

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Of course not, I am pointing at the agenda of these bunch of lowlifes; mock and insult Hinduism in garb of FOE. Why insult somebodies beliefs be it a Hindu or a Muslim? I have seen people defend MF Hussain for painting objectional paintings of HIndu Goddesses and in the same breath curse charlie hebdo and prophet's cartoons and how it is so wrong what they have done. Why this double standards and hypocrisy? Well as he has made jokes about Hindus/Hindu Gods why not about Muslims/Muslim Gods? The fact that he doesn't itself shows his intentions and doings. About his content I have pasted in the previous replies and the fact that he was denied bail was itself a testimony that the complain and case had substance.

Jeez Louize. You are literally making him guilty for something he didn't do. You keep saying he hasn't insulted Muslim religious figures when you should be saying what insulted you about the jokes he made. Where did he cross the line? Repeat offense of what?

 

[xeuss]

Of course not, I am pointing at the agenda of these bunch of lowlifes; mock and insult Hinduism in garb of FOE. Why insult somebodies beliefs be it a Hindu or a Muslim? I have seen people defend MF Hussain for painting objectional paintings of HIndu Goddesses and in the same breath curse charlie hebdo and prophet's cartoons and how it is so wrong what they have done. Why this double standards and hypocrisy? Well as he has made jokes about Hindus/Hindu Gods why not about Muslims/Muslim Gods? The fact that he doesn't itself shows his intentions and doings. About his content I have pasted in the previous replies and the fact that he was denied bail was itself a testimony that the complain and case had substance.

Sanghi sympathizer is taking great pains to defend the fascist society he voted for.

Here is Sanghilogic for you - Munawar Faruqui should be harassed because
1. Muslims get offended, so we can get offended too
2. He was put in jail. Never mind that the jail was on a false complaint and depraved society loves to lock up Muslims for any reason.

All the while, not one depraved society member has posted what was objectionable by Munawar Faruqui. But hey - he's got a Muslim name so lets harass the shit out of him because that is what gets us a rise.

The same depraved society members find nothing wrong with the naked carvings on their temples, that Abhijeet Iyer Mitra so hilariously referred to as "Humples"; and obviously find nothing wrong with what Naresh Agrawal said, because he was rewarded by becoming BJP MP.

 

[Fireurimagination]

Jeez Louize. You are literally making him guilty for something he didn't do. You keep saying he hasn't insulted Muslim religious figures when you should be saying what insulted you about the jokes he made. Where did he cross the line? Repeat offense of what?

Court denying him bail is good enough reason for me to believe that content was objectional. To convince you I will speak with Joe biden and let you know.

 

[xeuss]

Court denying him bail is good enough reason for me to believe that content was objectional. To convince you I will speak with Joe biden and let you know.

Courts routinely deny bail to Muslims in India. While Hindu terrorists are always given bail - example - Pragya Thakur and Amit Shah

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Court denying him bail is good enough reason for me to believe that content was objectional. To convince you I will speak with Joe biden and let you know.

The court should have objective guideline so the whole world understands what constitutes insult to Hindus. Or is it a secret?

 

[Fireurimagination]

Sanghi sympathizer is taking great pains to defend the fascist society he voted for.

Here is Sanghilogic for you - Munawar Faruqui should be harassed because
1. Muslims get offended, so we can get offended too
2. He was put in jail. Never mind that the jail was on a false complaint and depraved society loves to lock up Muslims for any reason.

All the while, not one depraved society member has posted what was objectionable by Munawar Faruqui. But hey - he's got a Muslim name so lets harass the shit out of him because that is what gets us a rise.

The same depraved society members find nothing wrong with the naked carvings on their temples, that Abhijeet Iyer Mitra so hilariously referred to as "Humples"; and obviously find nothing wrong with what Naresh Agrawal said, because he was rewarded by becoming BJP MP.

personal attacks, did I step on your tail awwhhh! Now the unproportionate number of muslims in Jails is because of the 'false complaint and depraved society' nothing to do with no education and more population of your kind. Depraved society better to take your head out of the sand and see happenings world over be it India, Europe, US, China, Africa. Learn to respect others to earn some respect for yourself. Keep doing crap and whipping out victim card at the drop of the hat, good thing is nobody anymore buys it. People like you and this comedian are the reason why tomorrow Yogi will be PM of the country.

The court should have objective guideline so the whole world understands what constitutes insult to Hindus. Or is it a secret?

Although It doesn't take a genius to figure it out but yes some people have empty top floors. These people can ask their fellow inmates about the objective guidelines

Courts routinely deny bail to Muslims in India. While Hindu terrorists are always given bail - example - Pragya Thakur and Amit Shah