MTCR benefit: India, Russia to develop 600-km range cruise missiles that can cover entire Pakistan

[GiG]

The inability of Indian force to develop its own technology is primarily the have open access to free weapon market so the Indian establishment always go for big procurement plans ,big procurement means big kick backs similarly their R&D teams has the option of failure due to this overseas procurement but in case of Pakistan we have no room for failure most systems are way out off budget and have restricted or no access to Pakistan forces so they have to develop there own in house solutions

 

[Mitro]

So Indian after manufacturing brahmos still need help to increase range from 290 -600 are this people dumb or what.
When Pakistan already have cruise missile with 700km range when same dimensions missile goes 1500km I don't know why Pakistan hide their missile range .

 

[AMCA]

The inability of Indian force to develop its own technology is primarily the have open access to free weapon market so the Indian establishment always go for big procurement plans ,big procurement means big kick backs similarly their R&D teams has the option of failure due to this overseas procurement but in case of Pakistan we have no room for failure most systems are way out off budget and have restricted or no access to Pakistan forces so they have to develop there own in house solutions

In house solutions? Which in house solution are you even talking about.. You get everything on loan from China anyways..

When it comes to India, India is doing it because our industry both pvt and public are well capable to absorb cutting edge technologies and also for the offset clause it brings. Our defense industry is at least 10 times bigger comparing Pakistan.

 

[asad71]

The irony will be when this is sold to Pakistanis!

 

[AMCA]

The irony will be when this is sold to Pakistanis!

1. Pakistan is not an MTCR member
2. Why would India sell such a weapon to its not so good friend?

 

[Max]

The irony will be when this is sold to Pakistanis!

There is already Chinese clone of P-800, Bangladesh should look for it..

We are happy with our highly maneuverable Raad, and Babur..

 

[The Huskar]

This simply proves that India don't have the technological capability of developing there indigenous defense product the news is a bit of shame for 1.2 billion Indians in comparison Pakistan has developed and operating 500 km + range cruise missile since 2005

That's comparing apples and oranges.And moreover Pakistan operates subsonic missiles which are a candy compared to building sustained supersonic missiles.

 

[ranadd]

This simply proves that India don't have the technological capability of developing there indigenous defense product the news is a bit of shame for 1.2 billion Indians in comparison Pakistan has developed and operating 500 km + range cruise missile since 2005

I understand the stupid post.

But please do read up on the the missile design regarding fuel storage. It may surprise you if you are able to understand it.

 

[B2B]

So Indian after manufacturing brahmos still need help to increase range from 290 -600 are this people dumb or what.
When Pakistan already have cruise missile with 700km range when same dimensions missile goes 1500km I don't know why Pakistan hide their missile range .[/QUOTE]

Because Pakistan has educated professionals handling these matters than liars and fanboys.

 

[Mrc]

There is no such video.

Any ways chinese c 400 akg is far more lethal atleast in anti shipping role... as its what is called a quassi ballistic missile

 

[#hydra#]

That's comparing apples and oranges.And moreover Pakistan operates subsonic missiles which are a candy compared to building sustained supersonic missiles.

Bit we failed miserably in subsonic segment, which is considered to be a cost effective solution.

 

[Dash]

Bit we failed miserably in subsonic segment, which is considered to be a cost effective solution.

Cost effective but more difficult than supersonic. Note that all the components in Nirbhay is indigenous. + it will have loitering capability and that makes it more complex.

 

[Mrc]

Cost effective but more difficult than supersonic. Note that all the components in Nirbhay is indigenous. + it will have loitering capability and that makes it more complex.

make it operational first...

 

[Dash]

make it operational first...

It will be when it's ready. Thanks for your concern

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Any ways chinese c 400 akg is far more lethal atleast in anti shipping role... as its what is called a quassi ballistic missile

That is not an onyx ,missile looks like a styx.As for c-400 it has no sea skimming mode and only HI-lo profile nor can it perform manuevres and is thus easily shot down, not even close try again.If you want specifics,see the multiple old threads in this matter.Missiles like c-400 with hypersonic speed are 1960s technology like kh-22 of the soviet union,they are nothing special as they are detected at loong distances by defense radars and due to high flight profile and no manuevre ability easily shot down..only hope is massed saturation attacks .But that depends on not facing a layered defence,and missile carriers getting close enough to targets in one piece.
China doesnt even bother to use c-400 itself in any meaningful way, it uses c-802/c-803 which are sea skimmers.