What's new

MQM agrees to Karachi’s ‘deweaponisation’

EagleEyes

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
16,774
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
ISLAMABAD: Apparently beset by a new wave of violence in Karachi, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement agreed in the National Assembly on Friday to ideas to “deweaponise” the city and send a parliamentary panel to investigate recent killing sprees there.

Ideas for what is called “deweaponisation”, or searching and seizing illegal arms, in the violence-plagued city had long been floated by both friends and foes of the MQM, to be countered by the Karachi-based party with its demand for a more daunting nationwide deweaponisation.

And proposals for sending an all-party fact-finding parliamentary committee to Karachi came from other opposition parties and a government-allied party without a response from either the MQM or the PPP-led coalition government.

But on Friday, MQM parliamentary leader Farooq Sattar came out with what looked like a grudging acceptance of both proposals after launching a tirade against the government, which his party was allied with until June, for allegedly backing what he called a nexus between terrorists and underworld mafia to harm his party’s prospects in next general elections at the risk of a civil war in the country’s commercial hub.

“Whatever the National Assembly decides I will be with you,” he told the house while referring to proposals, mainly from the main opposition Pakistan Muslim League-N party and the government-allied Awami National Party, for sending to Karachi a parliamentary fact-finding committee, which he said should find ways to “save the hen that lays the golden eggs”.

But he also called for the formation of a judicial commission to investigate and assess damage from recent waves of violence for paying compensation to sufferers and the formation of a Sindh Assembly committee to oversee operations by paramilitary Rangers to maintain peace in the city.

While talking of proposals for deweaponising Karachi, Mr Sattar first called for taking up a private bill his party had moved earlier this year — which also sought a total ban on importing weapons and ammunition — and then said: “You may do deweaponisation (in Karachi if you want), but first there should also be decriminalisation or demafia (operations),” he said, assuring the house of his party’s cooperation for restoration of peace in Karachi and for what he said in a couplet “planting a tree of love”.

Mr Sattar alleged that a conspiracy to destroy peace in Karachi had begun with the formation of the present government in 2008 — though his party was part of this government — and said the latest round of attacks on his party’s supporters was meant to avenge its second separation from the ruling alliance in late June.

And he said he had a list of 500 “gangsters” who he alleged had been let loose on his party without any obstruction from police and challenged the government to give a list of and act against any “black sheep” found even in his party of being responsible for violence.

The MQM has been sitting on the opposition benches after it left the government at the centre and in Sindh, though the party’s Sindh Governor Ishratul Ibad Khan withdrew his resignation last month.

But support to it from other opposition parties has been little more than desk-thumping cheers to its criticism of the government while they all had disagreed to its opposition to the revival of what is known as “commissionerate system” in Sindh, which restores five districts of Karachi, and none of them backed MQM leader Altaf Hussain’s demand two days ago for calling up army in Karachi.

One opposition party, the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islami, on Thursday even rejected the proposal, which Mr Sattar said was meant only to have a neutral force to oversee law-enforcement rather than a takeover of the city.

He said the PPP’s administrative moves were meant to deprive the MQM of at least five National Assembly and 12 provincial assembly seats.

The debate, in which five other lawmakers from both sides of the house spoke on the day, will be resumed on Monday when the house meets at 1pm.

MQM agrees to Karachi
 
.
This is being missed from the discussions even though it plays a huge role in the politics of Pakistan.

If Karachi does become de-weaponized, it will result in peaceful resolutions and political parties using violence as means to gain power in Karachi would be eliminated.
 
.
i completely supports Deweaponisation ... Make it illegal to hold any weapon ... if anyone found with any kind weapon will be fined 1 million rupees with 5 years in jail . :cheers:
 
.
make it 10 years jail!!! but sir who will enforce this law? who will lay down the arms and admit they have weapons in the first place?
 
.
de- weaponisation cannot work unless its available in the rest of country !
 
.
make it 10 years jail!!! but sir who will enforce this law? who will lay down the arms and admit they have weapons in the first place?

For that you need sincere law enforcement agency, the police is too much involved with the waderas of the area. the wadera thinks of the police force as his own body guards. Once this is eliminated, then the gradual process will start
 
.
and we are back to blaming waderas and all!! when honestly speaking "tolaa"(policeman) is harmless infact i feel sorry for them their weapons are older and out dated compared to party workers of ANP & MQM!!
 
.
Yes let's de-weaponise all of pakistan!! however we must start with karachi because that is the only city with 100s of target killings daily!!! while second spot is NWFP and the operation is currently on going there in search for talban! third operation must be done against balochis (mengals & bugttis) inorder to de-weaponise them too!

all hot spots must be de-weaponised!
 
.
Will MQM, PPP and ANP surrender all their weapons? Wao, that will be a huge stockpile of weapons if surrendered?
 
.
Will MQM, PPP and ANP surrender all their weapons? Wao, that will be a huge stockpile of weapons if surrendered?

i think they will just ask civilians to surrender their weapons but these parties wont surrender their weapons.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom