'Most challenging' US missile defence test a success

[Obambam]

Yes...Why not make the criteria to be panel 2408 on the nosecone? That is even more difficult a target than the nosecone itself. You missed the fact that the interceptions were successful. A tumbling vehicle effectively rendered the warhead useless if not completely destroyed. So if this is a non-nuclear warhead, the ground target was protected. We should not expect much from you conscript rejects.

Ouch! Does that meant to hurt? I guess it is fine for you to rub your own ego and stroke your epeenis since you're such a social reject whom no one cares about.

Good O'Gambit, too old to get out of ye house and mingle with society? Frankly, I don't careless and I'd rather be a 'conscript reject' than a self proclaimed ex-militaryman with no real social life

And yes, the SM3 defense system sucked. Even Israel looks down on it. It's fine to believe it works fine though of course!

 

[gambit]

Ouch! Does that meant to hurt? I guess it is fine for you to rub your own ego and stroke your epeenis since you're such a social reject whom no one cares about.

Good O'Gambit, too old to get out of ye house and mingle with society? Frankly, I don't careless and I'd rather be a 'conscript reject' than a self proclaimed ex-militaryman with no real social life

And yes, the SM3 defense system sucked. Even Israel looks down on it. It's fine to believe it works fine though of course!

What is really painful is a conscript reject trying to make a name for himself on a military oriented forum but found his arguments repeatedly debunked.

 

[Obambam]

What is really painful is a conscript reject trying to make a name for himself on a military oriented forum but found his arguments repeatedly debunked.

A military forum does not mean it 'HAS TO BE' about military. It is also about politics and society.

It is most painful for social reject who is too old to understand how society works and still thinks we are in the 50's LOL.
You are a typical nerd with no life outside the laboratory

 

[prototype]

why do i fell whenever I see gambit here on the forum he is under the continues attack from Chinese diaspora with special mention to his Vietnamese origin.

 

[ARSENAL6]

Looks like someone is getting nervous...That China's military is about to be knocked back a notch or two...

Don't worry I'm sure China will pick up the pace and will invent something that will really stir fear in the Warmongering Neo-con Zionist alliance.
Better not be too hasty about Chinese s Military ambition after all how many years are you in Afghanistan, I mean Talibans don’t have much incredible hardware and still they are kicking your @$$ pretty badly so begs the question
are you that powerful enough to put China down ? and with economy whining down and that your enemy China has got a good grip what makes it possible that the US is still a super power in the next 15 years ?
Better enjoy it while it last.

 

[ARSENAL6]

why do i fell whenever I see gambit here on the forum he is under the continues attack from Chinese diaspora with special mention to his Vietnamese origin.

I think you know that answer as someone whos been here long enough.

 

[ARSENAL6]

I would suggest not to underestimate USA, you never know when they again bounce back with bang.

Same can be said about Iraq, Iran, Pakistan Lybia and so on and go ramage against the US.

AMerica is not all "god-like" (astufulla) as it wants to think.

 

[Solomon2]

Another US rigged test. No independent agency verified there was no emitter inside the target.

Do you think your fellow Chinese monitoring the tests would tell us?

US loves using fake test "successes" and covering up weaknesses to attract funding.

You should distinguish between the civilian contractors who are tempted to do so for money and the military itself which is interested in systems working as advertised.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Do you think your fellow Chinese monitoring the tests would tell us?

No need. The US itself has reported that many times.

You should distinguish between the civilian contractors who are tempted to do so for money and the military itself which is interested in systems working as advertised.

No. You need to read the sources on how the US does simplify tests and more. Even out of the reported 10 successful tests 8 did not destroy the warhead, and one might have.

 

[below_freezing]

Civilian contractors are state subsidized anyways, especially larger ones like Lockheed. For all intents and purposes, they're state owned companies, just that they make private profit for a few. It would be majorly embarassing for the US if news of its failures got out onto the street, especially the Arab Street.

 

[khurasaan1]

No need. The US itself has reported that many times.



No. You need to read the sources on how the US does simplify tests and more for the tests. Even out of the reported 10 successful tests 8 did not destroy the warhead, and one might have.

Yes the probability of its success is not more than 50%....
so the 50% of US in vulnerable...

 

[gambit]

A military forum does not mean it 'HAS TO BE' about military. It is also about politics and society.

It is most painful for social reject who is too old to understand how society works and still thinks we are in the 50's LOL.
You are a typical nerd with no life outside the laboratory

For this discussion..IT IS...And the ignorance and eagerness to jump into subjects you Chinese boys know nothing about repeatedly made all of you look foolish. This is an anonymous Internet forum. Whatever aspersions you may make about my personal life are meaningless. Readers will judge someone's credibility based upon the CONTENTS of their arguments. So when we see this idiotic post...

Another US rigged test. No independent agency verified there was no emitter inside the target. US loves using fake test "successes" and covering up weaknesses to attract funding.

For those of us who have relevant experience in testing 'stuff', particularly weapons development 'stuff', we cannot help but laugh at that idiocy.

The more simpler the 'stuff', the quicker we can send it to the market. Unfortunately for weapons development 'stuff', we have gone beyond hand held bladed weaponry and into much more complex mechanics and electronics. The greater the complexity of mechanics and electronics, the greater the potential for failures from design flaws unless we implement a rigorous and INCREMENTAL testing regime with necessary data gathering and analysis processes and procedures to catch those design flaws before we send it to the market.

An incremental testing regime automatically mean, regardless of if the product is a toaster, a tank, a luxury airliner, or an ICBM, that -- ALL TESTS ARE RIGGED TESTS.



Did China's new J-20 flew under 'real world' flight conditions and combat scenarios? No? Why not? I thought 'Chinese physics' are real. I would think that the J-20 is now ready for deployment and even international sales. Or is it more likely that the J-20 and the DF-21 is undergoing the same methodical, rigorous, and incremental, therefore 'rigged tests', of their own?

No wonder I laugh at you jokers...

 

[gambit]

Yes the probability of its success is not more than 50%....
so the 50% of US in vulnerable...

I do hope that all militaries think exactly the way you do. It would make US plan for world domination easier.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

For this discussion..IT IS...And the ignorance and eagerness to jump into subjects you Chinese boys know nothing about repeatedly made all of you look foolish. This is an anonymous Internet forum. Whatever aspersions you may make about my personal life are meaningless. Readers will judge someone's credibility based upon the CONTENTS of their arguments. So when we see this idiotic post...

And the eagerness of a old Vietnamese boy starts defending a project that has multiple failures and has a history of rigging is even more foolish. This is an anonymous Military forum and we do judge based on your posts. Your posts reflect your fanboyism in the fact that you can't accept anything is wrong despite overwhelming evidence.

For those of us who have relevant experience in testing 'stuff', particularly weapons development 'stuff', we cannot help but laugh at that idiocy.

The more simpler the 'stuff', the quicker we can send it to the market. Unfortunately for weapons development 'stuff', we have gone beyond hand held bladed weaponry and into much more complex mechanics and electronics. The greater the complexity of mechanics and electronics, the greater the potential for failures from design flaws unless we implement a rigorous and INCREMENTAL testing regime with necessary data gathering and analysis processes and procedures to catch those design flaws before we send it to the market.

An incremental testing regime automatically mean, regardless of if the product is a toaster, a tank, a luxury airliner, or an ICBM, that -- ALL TESTS ARE RIGGED TESTS.



Did China's new J-20 flew under 'real world' flight conditions and combat scenarios? No? Why not? I thought 'Chinese physics' are real. I would think that the J-20 is now ready for deployment and even international sales. Or is it more likely that the J-20 and the DF-21 is undergoing the same methodical, rigorous, and incremental, therefore 'rigged tests', of their own?

No wonder I laugh at you jokers...

Just stop making excuses and off topic remarks. The SM-3 program has massive problems and should be fixed. Not brushed under the carpet.

 

[gambit]

why do i fell whenever I see gambit here on the forum he is under the continues attack from Chinese diaspora with special mention to his Vietnamese origin.

When the Chinese boys came on here, they made all kinds of outrageous claims about Chinese weaponry, many bordering on defying the laws of physics, especially when it came to 'stealth' when they want to diminish the technology. I politely presented my rebuttals, I stayed on subject and supported my arguments with credible third party and non-paywalled sources. My rebuttals were not meant to be comprehensive. It is not possible given the complexity of the subjects involved. However, my sources have relevant highlighted keywords for everyone to do their own researches to verify for themselves if my arguments are valid. These are very reasonable ways for any debates.

The Chinese boys here considers any challenges to their claims to be 'anti-China' and 'anti-Chinese', meaning they are tacit 'racist' posts. Basically, they grossly expanded the definition and contexts of 'racism'. They initially thought I was a typical white American with all the historical baggage regarding American history with institutional racism. But when they came into the fact that I was a Viet and a US citizen to boot, their own racism towards other and 'inferior' Asians came to light.

Bottom line is that the Chinese boys here, all probably conscript rejects, are overly sensitive to any challenges to their claims about the Chinese military and to think that an Asian could do those challenges well is simply unthinkable to them. To date, none could dispute my argument that I was initially polite in my rebuttals to their ridiculous and scientifically absurd claims. That ought to tell you something.