What's new

'Modi's India' isn't 'flirting' with fascism

And tell me, why would he discuss Shia killings in Pakistan with an Indian party leader? Why is it that whenever an Indian is confronted with a bitter pill of truth, instead of swallowing it down, they insist on vomiting it out while screaming whataboutisms? :disagree: :lol:

He wouldnt. Who said he would ? Why is it that a Pakistani jumps into a discussion without having any clue about whatss being discussed and starts show his foolish bravado ?? My post which you quoted first.. go back to it an read again.. I was talking about the interview comparison between Hina Rabbani Khar and Ram Madhav..where this Mehdi guy seemed more excited asking question to Ram Madhav on akhand bharat pictures that he saw instead of showing equal excitement while interviewing Hina Rabani Khar on Shia Killings. I hope you are able to understand the conversation now and wont start vomiting your verbal diarrhea on the topic :coffee:
 
.
where this Mehdi guy seemed more excited asking question to Ram Madhav on akhand bharat pictures that he saw instead of showing equal excitement while interviewing Hina Rabani Khar on Shia Killings

False equivalence, you nitwit.
Two completely different people were being interviewed about two completely different things. On one hand, Mehdi was interviewing a smirking (most likely illiterate) Modi toady who spoke in crappy English and genuinely believed that India will take over the subcontinent and on the other, he was interviewing a Leftist upper-class foreign minister whose boss (Asif Ali Zardari) was married with a Shia. Of course Hina would reject Shia killings (She did condemn them during the Q&A session when asked about them). No point asking such a redundant question. On the other hand, asking a Modi toady whose ideological hero believed Christians were bloodsuckers about Akhand Bharat would provoke a much more interesting answer.
 
.
False equivalence, you nitwit.
Two completely different people were being interviewed about two completely different things. On one hand, Mehdi was interviewing a smirking (most likely illiterate) Modi toady who spoke in crappy English and genuinely believed that India will take over the subcontinent and on the other, he was interviewing a Leftist upper-class foreign minister whose boss (Asif Ali Zardari) was married with a Shia. Of course Hina would reject Shia killings (She did condemn them during the Q&A session when asked about them). No point asking such a redundant question. On the other hand, asking a Modi toady whose ideological hero believed Christians were bloodsuckers about Akhand Bharat would provoke a much more interesting answer.

The Interview was with Ram Madhav and not PM Modi. Leave it kid.... dont argue, go play.
 
. .
I saw the interview.. laughed a lot. since to every question he answered as if the Indian Hindus have all the knowledge of everything, they are the most pious ones and everyone in the world misunderstands them for every wrong thing they do. :o:
 
.
I saw the entire interview.. trust me, Ram Madhav seemed a hard nut to crack for the entire length of the program... the answers from Ram Madhav were prompt and accurate. In fact Mehdi was under pressure when Ram Madhav started refuting his facts through the correct figures (the ones presented by Mehdi were incorrect)... in fact when the interview ended, Mehdi admitted on camera that Madhav's intevriew was a tough case. I wish Ram madhav was a little more fluent in english, at least the modern english that uses a lot of jargons. Good interview it was.

Off topic but this guy Mehdi is representative of the sauve, pseudo liberal Islamist fifth column that is working hand in hand with the Wahabbis to poison minds, promote alienation and radicalisation among British Muslims. Can't comment on this programme since I haven't watched it but Mehdi has zero credibility in my eyes after his comments in the Richard Dawkins interview

 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom