What's new

Modi to flag off first train from Arunachal to Delhi

I totally understand your view on the orientals. It's clear that your views on them reflects the general view of Indians on Orientals.

And what gives you this conclusion? Not all orientals eat dog meat. Not all of them chuck spears, not all of them attack others and not all have victim mentality. A lot of nonsense is media created here. China over the years has suddenly come up with this hallucination that all those who look oriental are somehow a part of their country. Yet, they don't have the guts to even ask Korea and Japan to join them in a union.

lol @Abotani , just another frustrated NE Indian. Come down to Delhi see how we treat you. He has fantasies the chins can take AP from India. LOL they can't even take tiny Taiwan located right next to them!

What have you got against the entire region?

Are you proud of Delhi's nonsense? I am also NE Indian and proud to be Indian.

The Tani tribes are on both sides of the border of AP if you didn't know. Please do make sure to know about who is who before generalising everyone.
 
.
What have you got against the entire region?

Are you proud of Delhi's nonsense? I am also NE Indian and proud to be Indian.

The Tani tribes are on both sides of the border of AP if you didn't know. Please do make sure to know about who is who before generalising everyone.

Nothing against NE Indians, he is just racist against India standard, so I gave him a taste of his own medicine. For the most part Dehliites treat NE Indians wonderfully, only a few bhaiyya discriminate/abuse.
 
.
More infrastructure development is required in that region....Indian government has realized the importance of infrastructure finally!!!!
 
.
Nothing against NE Indians, he is just racist against India standard, so I gave him a taste of his own medicine. For the most part Dehliites treat NE Indians wonderfully, only a few bhaiyya discriminate/abuse.
It is the refugees from Pakistan who bought their sh!t culture with them that act racist against NE Indians and not bhaiyyas.

Add to that the Abotani guy is a paid CCP troll, one shouldn't be surprised if China could plant a mole in India who was ready to sell himslef for some cheap bucks. His views are his own and he has no takers from his state. India has never had dearth of traitors and they can be found in every state and community. He should thank his maker that he sits in democratic India and makes spiteful comments against the country , had it been China he would already be languishing in a Laogai undergoing reform through labor.
 
Last edited:
.
Japan's stance is Japans. AP has been under Indian Control for the last 50+ years. China is wasting its time. China has no claim over this area. The McMahon line defined a boundary of Tibet before China illegally occupied Tibet. China should claim some other part of the world. Perhaps Alaska?

Japan's stance mean that your most close friend don't even recognize the land you claim, you have been there for last 50+ years so what? when Hun controled our land for over hundred years during Han danasty, we Chinese still claimed back and not only that we have banished them from their own homeland, we don't wasting time over South Tibet but timing it. McMahon line was drawn by a white british, it's not the line drawn by GOD, no a single Chinese in power recognized and signed the treaty...and you Indian want us to swallow that?? And yes we illegally occupied Tibet so are your Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh. And why claim a far reach Alaska when India is just in front of us...LMAO.

We are learning from China how to make an undisputed territory a disputes one. If you think that you are very smart, We are smarter than you. As I said our biggest weakness of a spineless government is no more now. You tested that in Chamur. If you try to make Arunachal Pradesh a disputed territory, Xinxiang and Tibet will also come on card. Choice is yours.

I don't know your Indian's claim about Chamur but the world knew what was going in 1962. As for dispute terroty, you can add this in the card: Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh, we will be glad to have a good discussion over this.
 
Last edited:
.
Seriously though...doesn't China have enough land territory, it's not like Xi Jin Ping is waking up in the morning and the first thing he is thinking is, 'oh China isn't big enough, we need more living space and more resources'.

We are 3 times smaller than China and AP means a lot more to us than China, its as simple as that.
 
.
Seriously though...doesn't China have enough land territory, it's not like Xi Jin Ping is waking up in the morning and the first thing he is thinking is, 'oh China isn't big enough, we need more living space and more resources'.

We are 3 times smaller than China and AP means a lot more to us than China, its as simple as that.

then why don't you give J&K back to Pakistan, don't you guy have bigger territory than Pakistan??? Seriously....
 
.
Seriously though...doesn't China have enough land territory, it's not like Xi Jin Ping is waking up in the morning and the first thing he is thinking is, 'oh China isn't big enough, we need more living space and more resources'.

We are 3 times smaller than China and AP means a lot more to us than China, its as simple as that.
I know you just want Chinese to speak the truth that India is superior.
China is big as well as Canada but both these two are lack of inhabitable land and weather.In opposite you and the US both have fertile land and warm weather.
 
.
For the size of our population we don't have enough fertile land. We are going to be a nation of 1.5B people soon and they have to be accommodated somewhere.
 
.
As long as India is strong China cannot take AP from India.

So if India keeps getting strong, who cares two hoots about what China thinks about AP.

At end of day, China is a pragmatic country. They wont risk suicide by attacking a powerful India for AP and loosing the battle. If this happens, they would loose face in world community.

For India there is only one thing they need to do: Control Corruption and Improve Economy

The growing economy should be used to:
Spread Education/Promote Top End Research
Make in India
Spend more on Defence
Eliminate/Control Radicalisation by iron hand

If India do this, China cannot even touch India. :P
 
Last edited:
.
As long as India is strong China cannot take AP from India.

So if India keeps getting strong, who cares too hoots about what China thinks about AP.

At end of day, China is a pragmatic country. They wont risk suicide by attacking a powerful India for AP and loosing the battle. If this happens, they would loose face in world community.

I agree, given the bloody, bloody 20th century history of China it really shouldn't warmonger. The world is becoming more peaceful gradually. Peace is in China's interests, it is after all going to be the major economic power of the future.
 
.
I agree, given the bloody, bloody 20th century history of China it really shouldn't warmonger. The world is becoming more peaceful gradually. Peace is in China's interests, it is after all going to be the major economic power of the future.

Even if they become warmonger who cares if India is strong.

If they attack India, and India repel its attack, only China would loose face.

We just need to work on becoming strong ourselves. Whether China is warmonger or not, is their decision and irrelevant to us.
 
.
Nothing against NE Indians, he is just racist against India standard, so I gave him a taste of his own medicine. For the most part Dehliites treat NE Indians wonderfully, only a few bhaiyya discriminate/abuse.

He is as much Indian as you are greek, buddy. His tribe is also found on the other side of the border. That's why I said, he doesn't count squat for what AP people have to say. There are three other people who are from Itanagar and I think Along. Just see their posts and you will see what this guy really is.
 
.
You are missing the point. Tibet was not part of China. Forcefully occupying a country does not mean you get to negotiate new borders (unless you seek trouble). China is incapable of attacking and winning over India. China's chance was in 1961/62. They could have declared ceasefire after invading AP and seizing it. They did not. Lines drawn by the British were just maintained as status quo. There is no 'timing'. It's just not possible. China does not have the balls to do it. China will go bully a smaller country that cannot inflict damage on the mainland. That's not the case with India, especially new leadership.

China did not sign any treaty recognising the line because the line had nothing to do with China! It was between Tibet and the British.

Its like me taking over your house and trying to negotiate a new boundary with my "new" neighbour ( your neighbour's neighbour).

There is nothing to swallow. You should be happy that China did a massive land grab while the world was distracted with the Cold War. Look at the response on Russia by the US/EU for taking over a tiny patch of land - Crimea.




Japan's stance mean that your most close friend don't even recognize the land you claim, you have been there for last 50+ years so what? when Hun controled our land for over hundred years during Han danasty, we Chinese still claimed back and not only that we have banished them from their own homeland, we don't wasting time over South Tibet but timing it. McMahon line was drawn by a white british, it's not the line drawn by GOD, no a single Chinese in power recognized and signed the treaty...and you Indian want us to swallow that?? And yes we illegally occupied Tibet so are your Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh. And why claim a far reach Alaska when India is just in front of us...LMAO.



I don't know your Indian's claim about Chamur but the world knew what was going in 1962. As for dispute terroty, you can add this in the card: Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh, we will be glad to have a good discussion over this.

And why claim a far reach Alaska when India is just in front of us...LMAO.

Because Chinese generals are dumb. They did try and claim 1/6 of the artic because they have 1/6th the population. Stupidity at its best! Or must I call it a high IQ statement? It's this kind of BS from China that causes trouble....for everyone....including China!
 
.
You are missing the point. Tibet was not part of China. Forcefully occupying a country does not mean you get to negotiate new borders (unless you seek trouble). China is incapable of attacking and winning over India. China's chance was in 1961/62. They could have declared ceasefire after invading AP and seizing it. They did not. Lines drawn by the British were just maintained as status quo. There is no 'timing'. It's just not possible. China does not have the balls to do it. China will go bully a smaller country that cannot inflict damage on the mainland. That's not the case with India, especially new leadership.

China did not sign any treaty recognising the line because the line had nothing to do with China! It was between Tibet and the British.

Its like me taking over your house and trying to negotiate a new boundary with my "new" neighbour ( your neighbour's neighbour).

There is nothing to swallow. You should be happy that China did a massive land grab while the world was distracted with the Cold War. Look at the response on Russia by the US/EU for taking over a tiny patch of land - Crimea.


And why claim a far reach Alaska when India is just in front of us...LMAO.

Because Chinese generals are dumb. They did try and claim 1/6 of the artic because they have 1/6th the population. Stupidity at its best! Or must I call it a high IQ statement? It's this kind of BS from China that causes trouble....for everyone....including China!

Lol Tibet is forcefully occupied?? We liberated slave from it owners, you can ask @Abotani. We control Tibet since Yuan dynasty thanks to Mongol invasion, at that time there was no such nation call India, your people was still living on mud and in the cave...LMAO. In 1962 we made a strategically retreat from South Tibet because the coward India was crying and beg Soviet and USA for help.

The line drawn by British has never been recognize by any Chinese government nor KMT nor CCP at that time, if you accept the line drawing by a british than logically you should accept the declaration of Winston Churchill in which India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator, which invalidate of all India’s claim regarding Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh.

China did not sign the treaty because thief forced into our house and expect us to give away part of our property and you Indian expects to inhere thief’s will and get what's belong to China, in this case you're worst than thief.

And you think South Tibet is Cremea? You Indian don’t how any legitimacy over this land that why Japan nor EU countries willing to accept infrastructure projects in this area, And they did not object China’s declare over South Tibet neither...sure you Indian expect that in case China take South Tibet by force all US/EU will respond an come to rescue.India:lol:

As for Artic, there is a difference between spinelessd Indian and a courageous Chinese, we dare to say what we think about this no man’s land such Artic but spineless India can only mumbling in silence.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom