What's new

Modi to flag off first train from Arunachal to Delhi

Lol Tibet is forcefully occupied?? We liberated slave from it owners, you can ask @Abotani. We control Tibet since Yuan dynasty thanks to Mongol invasion, at that time there was no such nation call India, your people was still living on mud and in the cave...LMAO. In 1962 we made a strategically retreat from South Tibet because the coward India was crying and beg Soviet and USA for help.

The line drawn by British has never been recognize by any Chinese government nor KMT nor CCP at that time, if you accept the line drawing by a british than logically you should accept the declaration of Winston Churchill in which India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator, which invalidate of all India’s claim regarding Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh.

China did not sign the treaty because thief forced into our house and expect us to give away part of our property and you Indian expects to inhere thief’s will and get what's belong to China, in this case you're worst than thief.

And you think South Tibet is Cremea? You Indian don’t how any legitimacy over this land that why Japan nor EU countries willing to accept infrastructure projects in this area, And they did not object China’s declare over South Tibet neither...sure you Indian expect that in case China take South Tibet by force all US/EU will respond an come to rescue.India:lol:

As for Artic, there is a difference between spinelessd Indian and a courageous Chinese, we dare to say what we think about this no man’s land such Artic but spineless India can only mumbling in silence.


What ever you post here, is not going to change any facts that Arunachal will see Indian railway operation. You keep discussing whatever you like.
 
.
What ever you post here, is not going to change any facts that Arunachal will see Indian railway operation. You keep discussing whatever you like.

Sure it will not change anything in the short coming beside we're not desperately need this land for now but you Indian should keep continue to build the infrastrcuture in this ocuupied land as I said ealier, when we take over, we don't need to spend a dime...this is only make sens to China.
 
.
Sure it will not change anything in the short coming beside we're not desperately need this land for now but you Indian should keep continue to build the infrastrcuture in this ocuupied land as I said ealier, when we take over, we don't need to spend a dime...this is only make sens to China.

'we' who is this 'we' . Land has to be occupied by people to live on, so peole live there hence occupied. lol. What are you saying man?
 
.
I don't know your Indian's claim about Chamur but the world knew what was going in 1962. As for dispute terroty, you can add this in the card: Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh, we will be glad to have a good discussion over this.
There is no insurgency in Hyderabad,Tripura,Goa,Sikkkim & Ladadkh,reports of dispute r wrong.We do have insurgency in North East just like Chinese r having Buddhist insurgency in Tibet & the Islamic insurgency in Xinjiang
 
.
'we' who is this 'we' . Land has to be occupied by people to live on, so peole live there hence occupied. lol. What are you saying man?

And what's the problem? once we claim back this land, these people will become our citizens. didn't you guys do the same Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh? all people lived and occupied these lands are become Indians now, isn't it?.
 
Last edited:
.
And what's the problem? once we claim back this land, these people will become our citizens. didn't you guys do the same Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh? all people lived and occupied these lands are become Indians now?.

you are already claiming it to be your part. But launching an attack with bums and missiles and boys toys. time will tell.
 
.
There is no insurgency in Hyderabad,Tripura,Goa,Sikkkim & Ladadkh,reports of dispute r wrong.We do have insurgency in North East just like Chinese r having Buddhist insurgency in Tibet & the Islamic insurgency in Xinjiang

that doesn't mean you can legally annexe these lands even there is no insurgency and Winston Churchil was very clear on that, if you accept Mc Mahon line than you should accept Winston's India declaration as well because both are British officials.

you are already claiming it to be your part. But launching an attack with bums and missiles and boys toys. time will tell.

Yes time will tell who will have the last laugh over south Tibet matter.
 
Last edited:
.
that doesn't mean you can legally annexe these lands even there is no insurgency and Winston Churchil was very clear on that, if you accept Mc Mahon line than you should accept Winston's India declaration as well because both are British officials.
U cannot annexe these lands by force,invasion but legally yes.
Yr knowledge about these regions is zero,better not talk about it. For eg Goa was under Portugese rule,the people of Goa fought against the Portugese. and got freedom. It is the people of Goa who voted for their state to be merged with Indian Union
 
. .
China liberated Tibet? Ask a majority of Tibetans and you will get your answer. It will not be the same as your CCP-certified response.

"your people was still living on mud and in the cave...LMAO." - You are an ignorant high IQ idiot educated by the CCP. It will take me too long to educate you so I wont bother.

"the declaration of Winston Churchill in which India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator, which invalidate of all India’s claim regarding Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh." - Same reason as above. You need to go back and learn history, just like Churchill. Vast regions of South Asia have been under the control of single empires that were not European. It is like looking at a certain point in history and saying that China's claims are illegitimate because there were times in history were "China" as we know today were just a bunch of different kings/tribes fighting each other.

"In 1962 we made a strategically retreat from South Tibet because the coward India was crying and beg Soviet and USA for help." - There was a request for air transport to move soldiers to the front lines. IF the war continued, China would have had to call it a ceasefire anyway. China was incapable of sustaining logistics. India had NO logistics. Hence China has a short-term advantage over India. Again, you live in a country where you will never learn the truth. The CCP will not allow you to access "non-certified" websites.

China did not sign the treaty because thief forced into our house and expect us to give away part of our property and you Indian expects to inhere thief’s will and get what's belong to China, in this case you're worst than thief.
- Tibet is not your property. Just because you want it does not necessarily make it yours.

And you think South Tibet is Cremea? You Indian don’t how any legitimacy over this land that why Japan nor EU countries willing to accept infrastructure projects in this area, And they did not object China’s declare over South Tibet neither...sure you Indian expect that in case China take South Tibet by force all US/EU will respond an come to rescue.India:lol:
- Japan will stay quiet for a while and over time they will change their political stance. Watch and see. That's how politics works. China has no balls to do that. Guess what? "South Tibet" is ruled by India and there is NOTHING China has/can do about it. That's the reality. So is Taiwan. Stop wasting your time by day-dreaming.

As for Artic, there is a difference between spinelessd Indian and a courageous Chinese, we dare to say what we think about this no man’s land such Artic but spineless India can only mumbling in silence.[/QUOTE] - Because the CCP is just a bunch of thieves willing to claim anything. You just contradicted yourself. Did you realize that? " No man's land" does not automatically become China's territory.
 
.
Sure it will not change anything in the short coming beside we're not desperately need this land for now but you Indian should keep continue to build the infrastrcuture in this ocuupied land as I said ealier, when we take over, we don't need to spend a dime...this is only make sens to China.

As if PLA is capable of taking AP. lol :D

IA will give PLA a thrashing of its lifetime if PLA ever tried to take AP.
 
.
Relax all..
Indians are way overreacting to the Chinese claims.

Frankly they can keep churning out as many maps as they like to feed their internal egos.

But, the fact remains that this is all hot air. China is detested by their neighbors (other than Pak) and the dreams they have on AP etc. are just that. The residents of AP have no interest in joining China.

& soon Tibet will be free!
 
.
As if PLA is capable of taking AP. lol :D

IA will give PLA a thrashing of its lifetime if PLA ever tried to take AP.

India bragg about capable of defending from China to take back South Tibet :lol:, Sure with the S.O.S hot line ready to call US this has made Indian pretty confident of challenging China...LMAO. you guys are just a laugh stoke of 21st century.

Relax all..
Indians are way overreacting to the Chinese claims.

Frankly they can keep churning out as many maps as they like to feed their internal egos.

But, the fact remains that this is all hot air. China is detested by their neighbors (other than Pak) and the dreams they have on AP etc. are just that. The residents of AP have no interest in joining China.

& soon Tibet will be free!

Lol Indian is talking like India is Angel in South Asia...which countries is in love with India beside your puppet Bhutan which want to be friend with China and under India's pressure of cutting cooking oil and financial aid, they have to step back...you Indians are so scare of losing influence of SA to China and talking about free Tibet , how about to have some good reading before India will be balkanized...

INDIA - CHINA Balkanization of India: a roadmap of Beijing? - Asia News

China liberated Tibet? Ask a majority of Tibetans and you will get your answer. It will not be the same as your CCP-certified response.

"your people was still living on mud and in the cave...LMAO." - You are an ignorant high IQ idiot educated by the CCP. It will take me too long to educate you so I wont bother.

"the declaration of Winston Churchill in which India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator, which invalidate of all India’s claim regarding Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya, Tripura, Hyderabad, parts of Himachal, Goa, Sikkim, Ladakh." - Same reason as above. You need to go back and learn history, just like Churchill. Vast regions of South Asia have been under the control of single empires that were not European. It is like looking at a certain point in history and saying that China's claims are illegitimate because there were times in history were "China" as we know today were just a bunch of different kings/tribes fighting each other.

"In 1962 we made a strategically retreat from South Tibet because the coward India was crying and beg Soviet and USA for help." - There was a request for air transport to move soldiers to the front lines. IF the war continued, China would have had to call it a ceasefire anyway. China was incapable of sustaining logistics. India had NO logistics. Hence China has a short-term advantage over India. Again, you live in a country where you will never learn the truth. The CCP will not allow you to access "non-certified" websites.

China did not sign the treaty because thief forced into our house and expect us to give away part of our property and you Indian expects to inhere thief’s will and get what's belong to China, in this case you're worst than thief.
- Tibet is not your property. Just because you want it does not necessarily make it yours.

And you think South Tibet is Cremea? You Indian don’t how any legitimacy over this land that why Japan nor EU countries willing to accept infrastructure projects in this area, And they did not object China’s declare over South Tibet neither...sure you Indian expect that in case China take South Tibet by force all US/EU will respond an come to rescue.India:lol:
- Japan will stay quiet for a while and over time they will change their political stance. Watch and see. That's how politics works. China has no balls to do that. Guess what? "South Tibet" is ruled by India and there is NOTHING China has/can do about it. That's the reality. So is Taiwan. Stop wasting your time by day-dreaming.

As for Artic, there is a difference between spinelessd Indian and a courageous Chinese, we dare to say what we think about this no man’s land such Artic but spineless India can only mumbling in silence - Because the CCP is just a bunch of thieves willing to claim anything. You just contradicted yourself. Did you realize that? " No man's land" does not automatically become China's territory.

Keep your long text short..ask your loverly gorverment if they see Tibet is annexed by China??? dare them to make a public statement...:rofl:
 
Last edited:
.
India bragg about capable of defending from China to take back South Tibet :lol:, Sure with the S.O.S hot line ready to call US this has made Indian pretty confident of challenging China...LMAO. you guys are just a laugh stoke of 21st century.



Lol Indian is talking like India is Angel in South Asia...which countries is in love with India beside your puppet Bhutan which want to be friend with China and under India's pressure of cutting cooking oil and financial aid, they have to step back...you Indians are so scare of losing influence of SA to China and talking about free Tibet , how about to have some good reading before India will be balkanized...

INDIA - CHINA Balkanization of India: a roadmap of Beijing? - Asia News



Keep your long text short..ask your loverly gorverment if they see Tibet is annexed by China??? dare them to make a public statement...:rofl:

Do more , talk less ..... :angel::angel:

Come and brag to us when you have taken atleast an inch of Arunachal Pradesh from us ...... :lol:
 
.
India bragg about capable of defending from China to take back South Tibet :lol:, Sure with the S.O.S hot line ready to call US this has made Indian pretty confident of challenging China...LMAO. you guys are just a laugh stoke of 21st century.



Lol Indian is talking like India is Angel in South Asia...which countries is in love with India beside your puppet Bhutan which want to be friend with China and under India's pressure of cutting cooking oil and financial aid, they have to step back...you Indians are so scare of losing influence of SA to China and talking about free Tibet , how about to have some good reading before India will be balkanized...

INDIA - CHINA Balkanization of India: a roadmap of Beijing? - Asia News



Keep your long text short..ask your loverly gorverment if they see Tibet is annexed by China??? dare them to make a public statement...:rofl:

Bhutan is definitely not a puppet state. Pak may be yours and am happy for you guys. (p.s. what's the plan on attending their parade??)

On Tibet, can you explain why we host the govt. in exile and why China has (or can do) done nothing about this? Our govt. does not need to make any statements.

You print maps to state your position, we host the govt.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom