What's new

Modi builds India's sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean

PARIKRAMA

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
4,871
Reaction score
185
Country
India
Location
India
Modi builds India's sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean

17 March 2015 2:24PM
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has just completed a ground-breaking tour of the Indian Ocean, aiming to consolidate India's leading role among the island states and counter China's growing presence in the region.

image.axd


Modi is now breaking some long-standing taboos in Indian foreign policy.

Enhanced security cooperation was very much at the forefront of Modi's visits last week to Seychelles and Mauritius. India has long acted as a security provider to these islands, including fending off feared coups on several occasions. The relationship is bolstered by their large Indian ethnic populations (some 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin and there is a substantial Indian community in Seychelles). For decades, India has been the major contributor of military equipment and training to both countries.

The head of Mauritius' navy and the Mauritian national security advisor are Indian officers, while the Seychelles maritime security advisor is also an Indian naval officer. Modi used last week's visits to promise additional Indian surveillance aircraft to Seychelles as well as handing over an Indian-built patrol vessel to Mauritius.

Modi's visit to Sri Lanka – the first Indian prime ministerial visit for almost 30 years – focused on rebuilding the political links between the two countries that have often been frayed and irritated by the Tamil issue. Modi pledged India's commitment to the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka, but also pressed Colombo to implement its promises of devolving power to the Tamil community. In doing so, Modi managed to avoid the antagonism that has previously surrounded the issue, raising hopes that India might play a constructive role in helping to facilitate lasting national reconciliation.

But Modi's visit to the region also had considerable strategic significance.

India is now in the process of building a maritime security grouping among the Indian Ocean island states as part of its aspirations to be a 'net security provider' to the region.

For several years, India, Sri Lanka and the Maldives have been parties to a trilateral arrangement involving training and capacity building of maritime forces, regular joint exercises and meetings of national security advisors. Last year, Delhi proposed that this arrangement should be expanded to include Mauritius and Seychelles, and potentially even other states. The proposal was blocked by Sri Lanka's former President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was concerned about the dilution of India's contributions to Sri Lanka (particularly in defence training). Rajapaksa was also unhappy with Mauritius, which had boycotted the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Colombo in November 2013.

This policy may have now changed under Sri Lanka's new President, Maithripala Sirisena, who has pledged to 'correct' Sri Lanka's perceived tilt towards Beijing.

An expansion of the trilateral maritime security arrangement to include Mauritius and Seychelles is now on the cards. The initial focus of the 'IO-5' will be on capacity building, training and information sharing, and perhaps joint exercises. Delhi is also focused on building a cooperative system of 'maritime domain awareness' for tracking and identifying ships and aircraft throughout the western and central Indian Ocean. Delhi has already installed coastal radar systems in the Maldives, Seychelles and Mauritius, which all feed information back through the Indian Navy's National Command Control Communication Intelligence network.

India also plans to build military facilities on the islands. Modi's visit to Mauritius included an announcement that India will upgrade airfield and port facilities at North Agalega Island, located some 1000km northeast of Madagascar, for use by the Indian military. This has long been discussed, but never acted upon. Using Agalega as a staging point will substantially help India's maritime reconnaissance efforts throughout the western Indian Ocean.

Just as interesting is India's agreement with Seychelles to develop 'infrastructure' on the uninhabited Assumption Island near the northern end of the Mozambique Channel. Along with the Suez Canal, the Channel is the main route for shipping between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Control over this and other so-called Indian Ocean 'choke points' has long been a key objective of the Indian Navy. The deals giving the Indian military access to these facilities will represent a major departure from Indian policy that has long derided 'foreign military bases' in the region. (Interestingly in the 1960s the US also planned to build a base on an island near Assumption before it settled on Diego Garcia.)

The immediate explanation for these moves is India's growing strategic competition with China.

Delhi is seeking to preempt China's perceived attempts to build its own strategic relationships in the region. China has longstanding security relationships with Pakistan and several other Indian Ocean countries. Some highly unusual port visits by a Chinese submarine to Colombo last year prompted significant concerns in Delhi that Sri Lanka may be moving to align itself with Beijing and provide access to the Chinese military. In recent months there have also been curious reports emanating from Namibia that the Chinese navy may have sought access arrangements to a port being upgraded by China at Walvis Bay. Denials by the Namibian Government were not entirely convincing. Whether true or not, such arrangements would be extremely valuable to China in helping to secure its huge energy imports from West Africa.

As nascent and aspirational as India's initiatives in the Indian Ocean may be, they represent important steps in giving substance to its claims to be a 'net security provider' to the region. A grouping with the island states may represent the beginnings of a new multilateral alignment in the Indian Ocean, with India at the centre. For India it would represent an important psychological step beyond its traditional adherence to nonalignment, which could have much broader implications.

India's moves also reflect an instinctive view among many in Delhi that if the Indian Ocean is not actually India's Ocean, then in an ideal world it ought to be.


Modi builds India's sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean
 
So IO-5 ? India , Srilanka , Maldive ,Seychelles and Mauritius.

Master stroke !!! Sharing our power with all . Will keep IOR region safe ;)
 
ive gotta admit even though i personally hate him narendra modi is a brilliant tactician
 
ive gotta admit even though i personally hate him narendra modi is a brilliant tactician
He has made foreign policy a priority and has been active. But decisions and policy directions still come from bureaucracy. Difference I see is, Modi has the courage to take bold decisions.
 
"some 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin"

Why do Indians always teach the wrong history in their schools?

Based on what do they claim that 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin?

Modern day India, which stole her name from "British India" is falsely trying to revise history and manipulate facts.

Apart from that the article is just full with wishful thinking, sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean, where every second country blames India for exporting cross-border terrorism into their terrirtorires or has some other dispute with her.

In short the biggest difference between China and india is this:

Indians talk, Chinese act.
 
"some 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin"

Why do Indians always teach the wrong history in their schools?

Based on what do they claim that 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin?

Modern day India, which stole her name from "British India" is falsely trying to revise history and manipulate facts.

Apart from that the article is just full with wishful thinking, sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean, where every second country blames India for exporting cross-border terrorism into their terrirtorires or has some other dispute with her.

In short the biggest difference between China and india is this:

Indians talk, Chinese act.

Please name the countries except Pakistan who accuse India of spreading cross-border terrorism.

Only reply with statements from official govt spokesperson of these countries in last two years.

If you can do it, then well and good otherwise stop repeating the same lies.

"some 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin"

Why do Indians always teach the wrong history in their schools?

Based on what do they claim that 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin?

Modern day India, which stole her name from "British India" is falsely trying to revise history and manipulate facts.

Apart from that the article is just full with wishful thinking, sphere of influence in the Indian Ocean, where every second country blames India for exporting cross-border terrorism into their terrirtorires or has some other dispute with her.

In short the biggest difference between China and india is this:

Indians talk, Chinese act.

Please name the countries except Pakistan who accuse India of spreading cross-border terrorism.

Only reply with statements from official govt spokesperson of these countries in last two years.

If you can do it, then well and good otherwise stop repeating the same lies.
 
Please name the countries except Pakistan who accuse India of spreading cross-border terrorism.

Only reply with statements from official govt spokesperson of these countries in last two years.

If you can do it, then well and good otherwise stop repeating the same lies.

Sri Lanka is another, which has been the victim of worst terrorism sponsored by India for decades.

Please come out of this state of denial. Thanks.
 
Sri Lanka is another, which has been the victim of worst terrorism sponsored by India for decades.

Please come out of this state of denial. Thanks.

India currently has no issues with Sri Lanka.

If you care to refute this fact, please produce a statement from Srilankan Govt spokes person.

I would be generous and say please produce a statement given by Srilankan Govt anytime during last 5 years.

Lots of shit happened long back in time, WW2 happened, US dropped a nuclear bomb in Japan and now they are best of friends. Please limit the discussion to current time period. Ca Va?
 
India currently has no issues with Sri Lanka.

If you care to refute this fact, please produce a statement from Srilankan Govt spokes person.

I would be generous and say please produce a statement given by Srilankan Govt anytime during last 5 years

We are talking about the fact.

And the fact is that India is the largest sponsor of cross-border terrorism in the neighborhood. Sponsoring terrorism for decades, which resulted in tens of thousands of innocent lives, India comes now with an innocent face and says, "now no one in Sri Lanka says that we are sponsoring terrorism there". Unbelievable!

How about a public apoplogoy followed by the severe punishmen to all of those who with the full backing of govt trained those terrorists, followed by a hefty compensation to each and every vicitm to Indian sponsored terrorism?

That is something which might create goodwill, or else are just wishful thinkgin coming out of Indian media.
 
India sent a peacekeeping force to Srilanka to fight LTTE and LTTE is a banned terrorist organization in India.

If you care to research the facts, India provided significant military support to Sri Lanka even after withdrawing its forces from SL to combat LTTE. We have atoned for our sins. Have you?

Anyway this discussion is irrelevant. Again I ask you please provide a official statement from SL govt accusing India of cross border terrorism in current time period. If you can't then please stop saying everyother country in IOR accuses India of terrorism.

I hope you can facr the reality and stop peddling your biased opinions as facts.

Good Day Sir
 
Back
Top Bottom