Only had a few thousand years of civilisation ahead of every other part of the world, people from the middle east have been conquering, ravaging, force converting entire nations for centuries and centuries unchecked, settling in Southern and Eastern Europe, large parts of Africa and Asia and spreading religion across the world, enslaving millions and apart from a few centuries of progress in the middle it has done nothing but slow down society and this stopped when European nations advanced further ahead, now the remnants of "civilization" are barbaric and archaic religions where most people are so backwards and really unaware and not concerned about progress or moving forwards in the world and this is the west fault?
If given an unlimited amount of wealth every other country apart from muslim countries removed from the world you still wouldnt progress, you would just fight each other like you do now as its not a new occurrence its been happening since Mesopotamia and with religions grasp has gone increasingly worse. The only reason you didnt hear about it before was because most of the region was so far flung back technologically speaking that any real troubles were tribal. The ME area was the birthplace of civilisation and was home to vast empires who stomped all over other peoples lands like the US etc does now, except the only thing those empires left was a religion which has shackled the populace. And given such time periods to flourish which the area did for a few millenia it slowed down, peaked up every now and then had a few hundred years of advancement in the so called "golden age" where alot of advancement came from places like Al Andalus (uhh invaded and conquered land) and then got thrown back into the dark ages where most countries mindsets still are. The wealthy arab countries think the best thing to do with all this money is stockpile gold and build skyscrapers each one bigger than the last, its going to take a hell of alot of mindset change to see conflict cease in the region and a few centuries atleast of people examine rational thought and thinking outside of what they have been told all their life, until that day religious beefs will keep the area down.
Its not the evil West to blame, its lack of cohesion and a united ground, even if you could get all the arab countries to stand united as one they will just have their superiority complex shrouding the surrounding nations
Hi,
I do have to agree with your last statement, except for the part where you have conveniently omitted your responsibility, resettlement of jews in Palestine by succumbing to pressure by Rothschild
Having said that, Wasnt it the Muslims who had saved jews from extinction during crusades ?
As far as enslavement and stuff is concerned, Son please let us not exaggerate it please. They were never forceful conversions as you have incorrectly mentioned out of your plain blind hatred. In fact it was more along the lines of how christian missionaries back in Times of British empire in India would come and convert the local poor population to Christianity, likewise Muslims were impressed by the justice and equality system of Islam and hence were CONVERTED.
Apart From religious discussion lets move on towards the so-called great Britain's atrocities and the amount of wealth looted from India. Obviously no one will be more ashamed than British himself when he has to read of atrocties not only just carried on India but elsewhere too. The near extinction of Indigenous population of Red-Indians in North america and on australia.
This is just tip of an ice-berg.
List of massacres of Indigenous Australians - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I possibly cannot list the massacres carried by the Great white Britain as the list will take me days, but i can sure list some of the details in the region of sub-continent from where I belong.
separate roads for the whites as they only had the right to drive cars, while the coloured or local population even if they were rich enough had to take roads where only donkey carts can be used or otherwise would just have to walk.
Karsevak India: BRITISH ATROCITIES AGAINST INDIANS
the massacre of 1850, the exploitation of local population, in fact my ancestors were slave in their own land.
Coming to modern times as latest as 50's
To talk about British atrocities in Kenya during the Mau Mau era is nonsense | John Allen | Comment is free | The Guardian
this is what was done.
The so-called of champions of democracy and freedom are the people who are from same descendants, so I wouldn't be surprised if a fully functional country such as Iraq is invaded for something like Non existent WMD in the name of democracy.
It could be for anything but definitely not out of goodness of pure heart.