Manvantaratruti
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,764
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Since the temple depicts Devanagari script, it can't be older than 8-10th century . It was placed by Indian Hindu merchants who were trading with the middle East.
What kind of logic is that ??? just because the inscriptions that were placed later is of 8th century the temple cannot be older ? As a matter of fact there is a inscription that was placed in the 16th century too. So why not say the temple was built then ?
Carbon dating shows the true age of the temple. As to its Hindu origin, read my first post. I do not want to repeat myself.
Hinduism and Zoroastrianism have common origin traced to Proto-Indo-Iranian religion after the split between the Indo-Iranian people and they weren't Hindus. Indians called their land as Aryavarta and Iranians call their land as Airyanem Vaejah.
LOL. The BRITISH called it Proto whatever. Indians called it Sanathana Dharma which is more than 8000 years old. However I am glad you recognize the Hindu Vedic roots of Zoroastrianism.