What's new

Meanwhile in India Its a Treason If You Wear Pakistani T-Shirt

Seriously you had any better expectations from baniya yindoos?
 
...it should be, as Pakistan is considered an enemy country of India.....
...now don't give the foolish and overused 'human-rights' and 'democracy' argument.......
...'human-rights' don't cover treason for obvious reasons.....:D
 
Last edited:
we rule them even when they are liberated from us by Stupid British
 
Wearing Pak t-shirt = treason, but still they want/expect open transit rights through OUR land to Afghanistan?
Yeah right!

That is part of a trade deal where Afghanistan by law can trade with India and Pakistan is breaking international law by not allowing our goods through.

Afghanistan joined the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, or Saarc, in 2007. The group includes Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, besides Afghanistan.
Besides not allowing transit under the Safta pact, Pakistan also does not permit the transit of Indian goods through its territory under another pact signed between neighbours Pakistan and Afghanistan in 2010.
 
i am a dude,
so wearing a specific T shirt is called bull***t?

Sry dat by seeing ur pic i thought u r a girl,

Next wearing a tshirt which reps urs in mine, mines in ur country is b$, n u knw dat
 
supporting enemy is treason in all countries of the world, pakistanis and bangladeshis have no brains to understand such a simple fact:D
You sir are indeed stupid ur saying that if a guy in a country supports a terrorist organization he should get shot in the face? certainly no unless he has connections with it... They were supporting Pakistan its thier right they are muslims you cannot stop them from supporting another country they would not do it if India was good to them.
 
That is part of a trade deal where Afghanistan by law can trade with India and Pakistan is breaking international law by not allowing our goods through.

Afghanistan joined the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, or Saarc, in 2007. The group includes Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, besides Afghanistan.
Besides not allowing transit under the Safta pact, Pakistan also does not permit the transit of Indian goods through its territory under another pact signed between neighbours Pakistan and Afghanistan in 2010.

Cut your utter indian bs. SAFTA does not have any thing to do with transit. There is NO legal or any other obligation for Pakistan to give india transit to Afghanistan. Don't try to ride on Afghanistan shoulder; Afghanistan already enjoys port access through Pakistan and Pakistan has no obligation to provide Afghanistan transit to india either.

Now that indian bs is busted, lets get on to the topic...how india is land of pure as some indians claimed. Should we spell out what "type" of land pure india is? or leave it to fill in the blanks?
 
Cut your utter indian bs. SAFTA does not have any thing to do with transit. There is NO legal or any other obligation for Pakistan to give india transit to Afghanistan. Don't try to ride on Afghanistan shoulder; Afghanistan already enjoys port access through Pakistan and Pakistan has no obligation to provide Afghanistan transit to india either.

Now that indian bs is busted, lets get on to the topic...how india is land of pure as some indians claimed. Should we spell out what "type" of land pure india is? or leave it to fill in the blanks?

Actually the pact was signed by Pakistan and Afghanistan to allow transit google it
 
Pakistan hampering trade with India: Afghanistan - Livemint

Referring to the South Asia Free Trade Area (Safta) pact that came into force in January 2006, Ahady said he was “quite unhappy” with Pakistan for restricting Indian goods from transiting through Pakistan, which he said was not in the spirit of the accord. His country’s “trade with India is hampered by it”, Ahady said.
 
Back
Top Bottom