What's new

Mashiur against fees for transit

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
Mashiur against fees for transit

Mashiur against fees for transit | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com

Thu, Mar 31st, 2011 7:21 pm BdST

Dhaka, Mar 31 (bdnews24.com) -– Bangladesh should not collect fees for providing transit or transshipment facility to India, says prime minister's economic advisor Mashiur Rahman.

"Had our country been an uncivilised one or our leaders been illiterate then we could have asked for the fees, but that's not the case," he told reporters after a dialogue on Thursday.

On several occasions in the past, both the finance minister and foreign minister had said that India should pay fees for availing of transshipment facility.

He was the chief guest at the concluding session of the dialogue titled 'Cooperative Development, Peace and Security to South Asia and Central Asia: Strengthening India-Bangladesh Relations' in the city.

"According to WTO principles, transit facility should not be used for augmenting revenue rather to pass on the benefit to the customers," he said.

"It's a non-starter if we think that by giving transit facility, Bangladesh is actually providing subsidy to Indian export," he added.


The shipment cost of India will reduce significantly due to transit facility as it is expensive to send goods through 'chicken neck' in Assam, Mashiur said.


The adviser said the government is removing the problems related to trade and transit, but cooperation in energy and water were yet to be explored.

"There are huge potentials of producing hydroelectricity in northeastern states of India, Nepal and Bhutan, and through regional cooperation Bangladesh can be a beneficial to it," he said.

Customers of power produced in northeastern states will be in mainland India but it is not possible to send the electricity through the 'chicken neck'.


"India needs the help of Bangladesh to get the environment-friendly and cheap electricity, and Bangladesh should extend its hand for that," he added.


About Mongla Port, he said Bangladesh proposed India to use the port but for that adequate investment was required. "The investment won't be justified if a certain volume of cargo movement is not ensured," he explained.

The advisor hoped that a substantial amount of investment would come to Bangladesh from India as it would be cheaper to send goods from Bangladesh to 'seven sisters'.

[[[MY NOTE:... WITH A FREE TRANSIT ALL THE BHARTIS CLEVER LIKE FOX WILL NOT INVEST A DIME IN BANGLADESH... AS THEY ARE GETTING EVERYTHING FOR FREE... ONLY A FOOLS LIKE MASHIUR CAN HOPE FOR GETTING INVESTMENT FROM INDIA...]]]

PKSF chairman Dr Q K Ahmed said six areas of cooperation had been identified to make Bangla-India relationship more vibrant and dynamic.

The areas are energy, agriculture, food security, water, trade and investment, and climate change. He said Bangladesh can invest on equitable basis in Bhutan and Nepal to get hydroelectricity.

"Nepal and India are discussing about the Saptakoshi River, but Bangladesh can also be included in the dialogue on equal participation basis," he said.

Former foreign secretary Shafi Sami said the relations between the two neighbouring countries were cyclical.

"Sometimes it reaches the peak of cooperation and sometimes there is only distrust," he said.

Former foreign secretary of India Salman Haider said many Bangladeshis and Indians were friends, but value addition of the friendship was very important.

"We're enlightened with political leadership and genuinely looking for collective approach as that is the demand of time," he added.

Saber Hossain Chowdhury MP said Indo-Bangladesh relationship should move forward but sometimes there were some 'short-circuit' in it.

Indian deputy high commissioner Sanjay Bhattacharia said ideas must be translated into action and it must help to improve livelihood of people and then the people would act as an agent for transformation.

MUHITH ON TRANSIT

The finance minister in the budget for the current fiscal year had made a provision for collecting fees for transit and transhipment at a rate of Tk 1,000 per tonne for bulk cargo and Tk 10,000 per container.

On Nov 2 last year, finance minister Abul Mal Abdul Muhith had said the government was going to formulate new rules to impose duty on transshipment of goods by India through Bangladesh.

"They'll use our facilities to transport their goods. Our infrastructure will be used and that involves some costs for the government. So we'll have to take something; it may be called fee or anything," he had told journalists after a meeting with the visiting mission chief of IMF at his ministry.


Muhith had said the existing transit rules of the National Board of Revenue (NBR) would be amended and the amount of fees will be re-fixed.

The main opposition BNP has long been opposing the transit facility to India.

Demanding cancellation of the recently-signed deals with India, BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia on Nov 7 last year said no foreign vehicle would be allowed to use Bangladesh territory.

Also leader of the opposition, Khaleda asked the government to scrap immediately the 'transit deal' with the neighbouring country.

bdnews24.com/ssz/mr/1835h
 
.
This muhith, mashiur and all the bharti dalal within Hassina government who is just appeasing bhartis...should be challenged openly by the people why no duty should be imposed on bharti transhipment product...??? By hurling insulting comment on other such as saying fools and uncivilized, illiterate to those who are demanding to impose duty... and giving lame excuses "Had our country been an uncivilised one or our leaders been illiterate then we could have asked for the fees, but that's not the case," and trying to say on transit no duty can be imposed where as this is giving corridor service not transit... is not gonna save their as*... The whole bangladeshi's are watching this treacherous deal by this BAL and hassina where they are selling the interest of BD just to appease the bhartis...

Free transit and other sort of co operation can only be justified if there would be any mutual co operation and benefit for BD with India... as we already know all these big mouth Indian has done nothing so far for the development of Bnagladesh and their hostile attitude towards any export of BD goods to India... on that occasion giving away transit for free to a country like India is something like treason with country... soon they will have to pay a big price for this...
 
. . .
^^ lets wait for that time..but we have to make sure that he wont leave this world before he understands reality
 
.
Mashiur does not know the reality but he will face the reality... soon...

If Awami regime can not stay in power,

Mashiur Rahman will escape to india
Muhit will escape US
Gowhar Rizvi is an indian born, already lives in US

It's Awami regime that we need to put in trial and ask these countries to send Mashiur, Muhit and Gowhar to be sent for facing trial. Bangladesh need to find other indian dalals to put all of them in trial for anti state activities.
 
.
"According to WTO principles, transit facility should not be used for augmenting revenue rather to pass on the benefit to the customers," he said.

"It's a non-starter if we think that by giving transit facility, Bangladesh is actually providing subsidy to Indian export," he added.

The shipment cost of India will reduce significantly due to transit facility as it is expensive to send goods through 'chicken neck' in Assam, Mashiur said.


1) This is not export. India has access. It is their internal problem, not ours at all. They should dig up Sarder Patel to ask why he didn't think about these problems when he strong armed the NE in the union.

2) Is Mashiur Rahman in possession of a contract about the energy import from Bhutan and Nepal ? Oops my bad, it is actually about transferring power from the source thru Bangladesh to mainland India.

3) Mr. Mashiur Rahman do you have a contract that you can take to a bank to borrow money with that ? Banks won't give you money against ambiguous promises !!

4)
"Had our country been an uncivilised one or our leaders been illiterate then we could have asked for the fees, but that's not the case," he told reporters after a dialogue on Thursday.
This guy should register himself as a lobbyist for India.
 
.
One Question..India is reciprocating this gesture by giving Bangladesh transit facilities to Nepal and Bhutan..so how much are Bangladeshis willing to pay for that?
 
.
It used to be Indian folks advocating their cases, which is expected and very normal. What is happening now is these guys are basically doing their bidding.
 
.
One Question..India is reciprocating this gesture by giving Bangladesh transit facilities to Nepal and Bhutan..so how much are Bangladeshis willing to pay for that?

None. We don't need any. The export volume is just a few million dollars.

India according to WTO and international laws obligated to provide transit to Bhutan and Nepal. Our trucks will take the exports to the border, after that its between India and Nepal or Bhutan. If India wants huge transit fees, we all know buyers pay for that. If India doesn't let it through, fine with that too.
 
.
None. We don't need any. The export volume is just a few million dollars.

Naive!! ..you will pass up trade relations with two whole countries because you want to spite Indians.

You think will earn more than by charging transit , than what you earn by owning niche sectors to in two separate countries.

Your trade volume with them is low because you don't own have any preferential transit agreements through India.
India according to WTO and international laws obligated to provide transit to Bhutan and Nepal. Our trucks will take the exports to the border, after that its between India and Nepal or Bhutan. If India wants huge transit fees, we all know buyers pay for that. If India doesn't let it through, fine with that too.

Yes we are suppose to, but not free of cost ..we can easily put transit charges on Bangladeshi exports(over land) to these countries.
 
.
Naive!! ..you will pass up trade relations with two whole countries because you want to spite Indians.

You think will earn more than by charging transit , than what you earn by owning niche sectors to in two separate countries.

Your trade volume with them is low because you don't own have any preferential transit agreements through India.


Yes we are suppose to, but not free of cost ..we can easily put transit charges on Bangladeshi exports(over land) to these countries.


No one is against with that but India will have to face the same tune if it want to export to its NE india... every one has asked for a mechanism where it will be win win for both... such as India will provide us a certain percentage of amount that they will save by this transit as duty... as it will save money and time both for india it can be regarded as win win for both... but these free transit does not make any sense... as India will transport couple of time more product to NE india then bd will transport to nepal and bhutan... n in the case of imposing duty bd will also give the same amount for transit to nepal and bhutan that India will give to bangladesh... I think this is better deal and the also demanded by opposition party ... which will make every one happy... if India does not want to see the cancellation of transit in the near future with the change of government...
 
.
No one is against with that but India will have to face the same tune if it want to export to its NE india... every one has asked for a mechanism where it will be win win for both... such as India will provide us a certain percentage of amount that they will save by this transit as duty... as it will save money and time both for india it can be regarded as win win for both... but these free transit does not make any sense... as India will transport couple of time more product to NE india then bd will transport to nepal and bhutan... n in the case of imposing duty bd will also give the same amount for transit to nepal and bhutan that India will give to bangladesh... I think this is better deal and the also demanded by opposition party ... which will make every one happy... if India does not want to see the cancellation of transit in the near future with the change of government...

I think it would rather fairer if we provided you free transit to Bhutan and Nepal and you provide us free transit to North east India..because it is barter deal..

India will not loose anything if we provide you the facilities to use our roads and similarly for Bangladesh.
By involving money in it..you will only complicate things..this is exactly what your economic experts are also recommending.

Plus if we charge you transit for Bangladeshi export to Nepal and Bhutan ..your goods will become less competitive and loose its markets.

On the top of it Bangladeshi transit fee make transit through it uneconomical..we can always use other routes..this not the option available to Bangladesh.

So question is are you smart enough to understand the concept of " You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours"??
 
.
No one is against with that but India will have to face the same tune if it want to export to its NE india... every one has asked for a mechanism where it will be win win for both... such as India will provide us a certain percentage of amount that they will save by this transit as duty... as it will save money and time both for india it can be regarded as win win for both... but these free transit does not make any sense... as India will transport couple of time more product to NE india then bd will transport to nepal and bhutan... n in the case of imposing duty bd will also give the same amount for transit to nepal and bhutan that India will give to bangladesh... I think this is better deal and the also demanded by opposition party ... which will make every one happy... if India does not want to see the cancellation of transit in the near future with the change of government...

I think it is fair for bangladshis to ask for transit fee(unless there is some international law against it). It is important that bangladeshis see that they are getting benefit too, one sided friendship does not last long.
 
.
I think it would rather fairer if we provided you free transit to Bhutan and Nepal and you provide us free transit to North east India..because it is barter deal..

India will not loose anything if we provide you the facilities to use our roads and similarly for Bangladesh.
By involving money in it..you will only complicate things..this is exactly what your economic experts are also recommending.

Plus if we charge you transit for Bangladeshi export to Nepal and Bhutan ..your goods will become less competitive and loose its markets.

On the top of it Bangladeshi transit fee make transit through it uneconomical..we can always use other routes..this not the option available to Bangladesh.

So question is are you smart enough to understand the concept of " You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours"??

Nepal and bhutan is never a big market... so getting transit facility over there is not that much necessary for Bangladesh... regarding transit bd and india both will provide same amount of fees.... which will save money for both that specially india spent on transporting goods... as India will transport more goods to NE India or NE india to main land india ... it is better for BD in this case to impose a duty which is win win for both...

N regarding losing competitiveness it does not a matter as bd has low manufacturing and labor cost ... it will be compensated..
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom