divya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 2,110
- Reaction score
- 0
"Cause we are living in a material world and I am a material girl" crooned Madonna in the Eighties. Fast forward to the 21st century, and we all know there is more to a marriage than love. Today's woman has become assertive about more than her rights. She also makes known her likes and dislikes with the result that society labels her as materialistic.
Rewind just a bit: the Indian mother traditionally saved the best food for her husband and children. She might have eaten cold food, sometimes the leftovers. By the time her children grew up and were able to understand their mother's likes and dislikes, she might have lost any sense of entitlement to her choices. She becomes less of an individual every time she proclaims "I live for my family". It is the same family that does not bother about what mother is eating. Is any of this necessary? Why should a woman give up her favourite things when she marries?
Even in this day and age, Indian women are expected to change their views and habits to suit the wishes of husband and in-laws. A woman who demands something or expresses a preference is considered difficult, perhaps even a 'family-breaker'.
Mridul Chatterjee, a literature teacher in Pune puts it very simply: "Marriage is like a lifetime thrown into the fire with few mantras and a boxful of dreams, career, friends, family, lifestyle all neatly packed and pushed under the bed. After she gets married, it is generally expected that a woman will never again have an opinion. I agreed to a marriage because I think it's a union of two people, not a deletion of my being."
It is ironic that women are frontrunners in almost every sphere now, but in their own homes, many are treated like second-class individuals. But the world is changing. Lawyer Sangita Pal, who will tie the knot this year, says, "A changed society needs strong women who can steadily hold the family and her profession, but in the process, doesn't lose her own identity."
Read more: Married or not, a woman must be herself - The Times of India Married or not, a woman must be herself - The Times of India
Rewind just a bit: the Indian mother traditionally saved the best food for her husband and children. She might have eaten cold food, sometimes the leftovers. By the time her children grew up and were able to understand their mother's likes and dislikes, she might have lost any sense of entitlement to her choices. She becomes less of an individual every time she proclaims "I live for my family". It is the same family that does not bother about what mother is eating. Is any of this necessary? Why should a woman give up her favourite things when she marries?
Even in this day and age, Indian women are expected to change their views and habits to suit the wishes of husband and in-laws. A woman who demands something or expresses a preference is considered difficult, perhaps even a 'family-breaker'.
Mridul Chatterjee, a literature teacher in Pune puts it very simply: "Marriage is like a lifetime thrown into the fire with few mantras and a boxful of dreams, career, friends, family, lifestyle all neatly packed and pushed under the bed. After she gets married, it is generally expected that a woman will never again have an opinion. I agreed to a marriage because I think it's a union of two people, not a deletion of my being."
It is ironic that women are frontrunners in almost every sphere now, but in their own homes, many are treated like second-class individuals. But the world is changing. Lawyer Sangita Pal, who will tie the knot this year, says, "A changed society needs strong women who can steadily hold the family and her profession, but in the process, doesn't lose her own identity."
Read more: Married or not, a woman must be herself - The Times of India Married or not, a woman must be herself - The Times of India