What's new

Mapping China’s middle class

AndrewJin

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
14,904
Reaction score
23
Country
China
Location
China
a 2013 article
Mapping China’s middle class

Around two-thirds of the global wealth middle class are now recruited from Asia,
and 85% of them hail from China.
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 14.15.51.png


The explosive growth of China’s emerging middle class has brought sweeping economic change and social transformation—and it’s not over yet. By 2022, our research suggests, more than 75 percent of China’s urban consumers will earn 60,000 to 229,000 renminbi ($9,000 to $34,000) a year.

In purchasing-power-parity terms, that range is between the average income of Brazil and Italy. Just 4 percent of urban Chinese households were within it in 2000—but 68 percent were in 2012. In the decade ahead, the middle class’s continued expansion will be powered by labor-market and policy initiatives that push wages up, financial reforms that stimulate employment and income growth, and the rising role of private enterprise, which should encourage productivity and help more income accrue to households. Should all this play out as expected, urban-household income will at least double by 2022.

Beneath the topline figures are significant shifts in consumption dynamics, which we have been tracking since 2005 using a combination of questionnaires and in-depth interviews to create a detailed portrait by income level, age profile, geographic location, and shopping behaviour. Our latest research suggests that within the burgeoning middle class, the upper middle class is poised to become the principal engine of consumer spending over the next decade.

As that happens, a new, more globally minded generation of Chinese will exercise disproportionate influence in the market. Middle-class growth will be stronger in smaller, inland cities than in the urban strongholds of the eastern seaboard. And the Internet’s consumer impact will continue to expand. Already, 68 percent of the middle class has access to it, compared with 57 percent of the total urban population (see “China’s e-tail revolution”).


Importance of the ‘upper’ cut
The evolution of the middle class means that sophisticated and seasoned shoppers—those able and willing to pay a premium for quality and to consider discretionary goods and not just basic necessities—will soon emerge as the dominant force. To underscore this group’s growing importance, we have described it in past research as the “new mainstream.” For the sake of simplicity, we now call consumers with household incomes in the 106,000 to 229,000 renminbi range upper middle class. In 2012, this segment, accounting for just 14 percent of urban households, was dwarfed by the mass middle class, with household incomes from 60,000 to 106,000 renminbi. By 2022, we estimate, the upper middle class will account for 54 percent of urban households and 56 percent of urban private consumption. The mass middle will dwindle to 22 percent of urban households (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1
The magnitude of China’s middle-class growth is transforming the nation.
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 14.59.25.png


The behavior of today’s upper middle class provides some clues to China’s future. Our research indicates that these consumers are more likely to buy laptops, digital cameras, and specialized household items, such as laundry softeners (purchased by 56 percent of the upper-middle-class consumers we surveyed last year, compared with just 36 percent of the mass middle). Along with affluent and ultrawealthy consumers, upper-middle-class ones are stimulating rapid growth in luxury-goods consumption, which has surged at rates of 16 to 20 percent per annum for the past four years. By 2015, barring unforeseen events, more than one-third of the money spent around the world on high-end bags, shoes, watches, jewelry, and ready-to-wear clothing will come from Chinese consumers in the domestic market or outside the mainland.


Generation 2 comes of age

China’s new middle class also divides into different generations, the most striking of which we call Generation 2 (G2). It comprised nearly 200 million consumers in 2012 and accounted for 15 percent of urban consumption. In ten years’ time, their share of urban consumer demand should more than double, to 35 percent. By then, G2 consumers will be almost three times as numerous as the baby-boomer population that has been shaping US consumption for years.

These G2 consumers today are typically teenagers and people in their early 20s, born after the mid-1980s and raised in a period of relative abundance. Their parents, who lived through years of shortage, focused primarily on building economic security. But many G2 consumers were born after Deng Xiaoping’s visit to the southern region—the beginning of a new era of economic reform and of China’s opening up to the world. They are confident, independent minded, and determined to display that independence through their consumption. Most of them are the only children in their families because when they were born, the government was starting to enforce its one-child policy quite strictly.

McKinsey research has shown that this generation of Chinese consumers is the most Westernized to date. Prone to regard expensive products as intrinsically better than less expensive ones, they are happy to try new things, such as personal digital gadgetry. They are also more likely than previous generations to check the Internet for other people’s usage experiences or comments. These consumers seek emotional satisfaction through better taste or higher status, are loyal to the brands they trust, and prefer niche over mass brands (Exhibit 2). Teenage members of this cohort already have a big influence on decisions about family purchases, according to our research.

Exhibit 2
Generation 2—Chinese consumers in their teens and early 20s—takes a more Western approach to shopping.
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 15.02.50.png


Even as the G2 cohort reshapes Chinese consumption patterns, it appears to be maintaining continuity with some of the previous generations’ values. Many G2 consumers share with their parents and grandparents a bias for saving, an aversion to borrowing, a determination to work hard, and a definition of success in terms of money, power, and social status. For the G2 cohort, however, continuity in values doesn’t translate into similar consumer behavior. Likewise, 25- to 44-year-old G1 consumers, despite their loyalty to established brands, are more open than their parents to a variety of schools of thought, and as retirees in the years ahead they will certainly demonstrate a “younger” consumption mind-set than today’s elderly do.


The rise of the west (and the north)
In 2002, 40 percent of China’s relatively small urban middle class lived in the four Tier-one cities: Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen. By 2022, the share of those megacities will probably fall to about 16 percent (Exhibit 3). They won’t be shrinking, of course; rather, middle-class growth rates will be far greater in the smaller cities of the north and west. Many are classified as Tier-three cities, whose share of China’s upper-middle-class households should reach more than 30 percent by 2022, up from 15 percent in 2002.

Tier-four cities, smaller still, will also be part of that geographic transition. Consider Jiaohe, in Jilin Province. This northern inland Tier-four city is growing quickly because of its position as a transportation center at the heart of the northeast Asian economic zone, an abundance of natural resources (such as Chinese forest herbs and edible fungi), and the fact that it is one of China’s most important production bases for grape and rice wine. In 2000, less than 1,000 households out of 70,000 were middle class, but by 2022, those figures are set to rise to 90,000 and 160,000, respectively.

Another Tier-four city, Wuwei, in Gansu Province, is growing rapidly because it’s within the Jinchang–Wuwei regional-development zone and at the junction of two railways and several highways. Wuwei too had less than 1,000 middle-class households (out of 87,000 total) in 2000. By 2022, though, 390,000 of the city’s 650,000 households should be middle class.

Exhibit 3
The geographic center of middle-class growth is shifting.
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 15.03.32.png
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 15.04.12.png
屏幕快照 2015-10-05 15.05.31.png


Continued strong growth in the size and diversity of China’s middle class will create new market opportunities for both domestic and international companies. Yet strategies that succeeded in the past, given the wide distribution of standardized products for mass consumers, must be adjusted in a new environment with millions of Chinese trading up and becoming more picky in their tastes. A detailed understanding of what consumers are doing, how their preferences are evolving, and the underlying reasons for their behavior will be needed.

Armed with better information, companies can begin tailoring their product portfolios to the needs of increasingly sophisticated consumers and revising brand architectures to differentiate offerings and attract younger consumers eager for fresh buying experiences. There will be not only challenges but also plenty of opportunities for companies whose strategies reflect China’s new constellation of rising incomes, shifting urban landscapes, and generational change.


Mapping China’s middle class | McKinsey & Company


@Yizhi @Shotgunner51 @TaiShang @Stranagor @cirr @Keel @Jlaw @Place Of Space @FairAndUnbiased @zeronet @Raphael @sweetgrape @Edison Chen @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @cnleio @+4vsgorillas-Apebane @onebyone @yusheng @Kyle Sun @dy1022 @Beast @YoucanYouup @terranMarine @ahojunk @kuge@Economic superpower @Beidou2020 @cirr @JSCh @jkroo @Pangu @ChineseTiger1986 @powastick @onebyone @kankan326 @badguy2000 @TianyaTaiwan @ahtan_china @ChineseTiger1986 @powastick @empirefighter @hexagonsnow @xuxu1457 @sword1947 @tranquilium@XiaoYaoZi @55100864 @Sommer @HongWu002 @Speeder 2 @Dungeness @utp45 @StarCraft_ZT2 @Martian2 @Jguo @Arryn @rott @TheTruth @Dungeness @immortalsoul
@Bussard Ramjet @Echo_419 @Luca1 @Azizam@Gibbs @liubang @Huan @Rajaraja Chola @kuge @somsak @Abotani @Gufi @waz @Hu Songshan @Rasengan @Bilal9 @UKBengali @CAPRICORN-88 @Nan Yang @70U63 @Daniel808 @21stCentury @sword1947 @Nihonjin1051 @beijingwalker @xunzi @jkroo et al

a shopping mall under construction
10% of world's newly opened shopping centres in 2014 are in Wuhan

W020130922202166192348.jpg
 
Last edited:
But don't you think as wealth explodes people will put that wealth towards non-consumer items such as larger homes in better areas?

There seems to be a cycle when it comes to wealth.
1) Country is mostly rural with people struggling to simply feed themselves.
2) industrialization occurs and people flock to urban areas to work in factories.
3) people start working in better white collar jobs and earn more money than their blue collar peers.

There then becomes an income splitting of "haves" and "have nots"

The upper middle class "haves" demand better surroundings/education so they move out of crowded city life (which has "have nots") and into the suburbs since they can easily afford bigger living spaces. Their neighbors are also mostly "haves". Better schools pop up because the "haves" can afford the best teachers. Higher-end stores move to their areas..etc. The cities turn into concentrated "have not" areas.
 
But don't you think as wealth explodes people will put that wealth towards non-consumer items such as larger homes in better areas?

There seems to be a cycle when it comes to wealth.
1) Country is mostly rural with people struggling to simply feed themselves.
2) industrialization occurs and people flock to urban areas to work in factories.
3) people start working in better white collar jobs and earn more money than their blue collar peers.

There then becomes an income splitting of "haves" and "have nots"

The upper middle class "haves" demand better surroundings/education so they move out of crowded city life (which has "have nots") and into the suburbs since they can easily afford bigger living spaces. Their neighbors are also mostly "haves". Better schools pop up because the "haves" can afford the best teachers. Higher-end stores move to their areas..etc. The cities turn into concentrated "have not" areas.
China is not USA. Houses and apartments in downtown are much more expensive than suburban area in China.
In my city, poor people and newcomers live in suburb.
And best middle schools in China are public schools.
 
China is not USA. Houses and apartments in downtown are much more expensive than suburban area in China.
In my city, poor people and newcomers live in suburb.
And best middle schools in China are public schools.

I never said the houses and apartments in cities are cheap.
In the US houses and apartments in downtown areas are very expensive too, in some of the less desirable areas they are lower.

They are so unaffordable in price many of them are rented out for sheer profit. To the point units designed for say three people have 6 people jammed into them so they can afford the rent.
 
I never said the houses and apartments in cities are cheap.
In the US houses and apartments in downtown areas are very expensive too, in some of the less desirable areas they are lower.

They are so unaffordable in price many of them are rented out for sheer profit. To the point units designed for say three people have 6 people jammed into them so they can afford the rent.
Downtown in any Chinese city is huge, quite different from American cities. In my city, more than 20km*20km is urban areas, at least 10*10km can be called the very downtown. For example apartment in my region costs 20-25k yuan per m2, in less downtown region, 15-20k yuan. In the suburb, it costs 10k-15k. I think the price difference in New York is much bigger.
 
Downtown in any Chinese city is huge, quite different from American cities. In my city, more than 20km*20km is urban areas, at least 10*10km can be called the very downtown. For example apartment in my region costs 20-25k yuan per m2, in less downtown region, 15-20k yuan. In the suburb, it costs 10k-15k. I think the price difference in New York is much bigger.

Here's an example of how a quick rise in income can cause a shift. In the US many teens have their own car (bought with help by their middle class parents...which probably before 1950 was a rarity). If there's multiple kids with cars...parking can be a hassle. It isn't unusual for a family to have 4 to 5 cars. That can be tough if you live in the city. My parents had two spots. Most places built before say 1965 never expected a need for more than 2 spots. The rest of us had to deal with looking for an empty spot on the street. You better believe when we grew up we didn't repeat that issue again. Now all of us have places that have enough to fit everybody.
 
Last edited:
Here's an example of how a quick rise in income can cause a shift. In the US many teens have their own car (bought with help by their middle class parents...which probably before 1950 was a rarity). If there's multiple kids with cars...parking can be a hassle. It isn't unusual for a family to have 4 to 5 cars. That can be tough if you live in the city. My parents had two spots. Most places built never expected a need for more than 2 spots. The rest of us had to deal with looking for an empty spot on the street. You better believe when we grew up we didn't repeat that issue again. Now all of us have places that have enough to fit everybody.
Transport strategies here are different, we cannot waste land like in U.S. High density communities with highly efficient public transport are the only solution here. Intercity HSR instead of private cars, middle-distance HSR instead of flights. Self-driving trips are and will be only a relatively small proportion.

From Shanghai to Nanjing, 300km, people's first choice is to buy bullet train tickets, every 5-10 minutes a train, 1.5 hours.
 
Transport strategies here are different, we cannot waste land like in U.S. High density communities with highly efficient public transport are the only solution here. Intercity HSR instead of private cars, middle-distance HSR instead of flights. Self-driving trips are and will be only a relatively small proportion.

From Shanghai to Nanjing, 300km, people's first choice is to buy bullet train tickets, every 5-10 minutes a train, 1.5 hours.

So are you planning on giving up your car? As incomes rise more and more cars will be on the road. What seemed impossible years ago will be a reality. Soon a kid's 18th birthday means a car from mom and dad. It's inevitable.

img_red_bows_car.jpg
 
Last edited:
So are you planning on giving up your car? As incomes rise more and more cars will be on the road. What seemed impossible years ago will be a reality. Soon a kid's 18th birthday means a car from mom and dad. It's inevitable.

img_red_bows_car.jpg
I have licence, but I won't buy car in the near future.
The fact is, I don't need to.

Public transport in my city is perfect.
A/C bus is very 5-10 minutes, metro every 3-5 minutes.
I can go to any major cities within the province via HSR.
I can go to all first-tier cities, Beijing/Shanghai/Guangzhou/Shenzhen by bullet trains no more than 5 hours.

It is undoubtedly there will be more and more cars in China,
but Chinese are not dependent on cars like Americans.
Don't you feel tired driving a car for hours on expressway?
Why not take a 300km/h high-speed train?

China should learn from Japan's public transport system
instead of America's inefficient and energy-wasting system.
Different country different strategies.
End of discussion here.
 
Last edited:
Here's an example of how a quick rise in income can cause a shift. In the US many teens have their own car (bought with help by their middle class parents...which probably before 1950 was a rarity). If there's multiple kids with cars...parking can be a hassle. It isn't unusual for a family to have 4 to 5 cars. That can be tough if you live in the city. My parents had two spots. Most places built before say 1965 never expected a need for more than 2 spots. The rest of us had to deal with looking for an empty spot on the street. You better believe when we grew up we didn't repeat that issue again. Now all of us have places that have enough to fit everybody.
Well that sucks.. Having to Live your everyday life around cars.

I much prefer american towns built before 1950s,the ones with big sidewalks,where you can actually see your neighbors walking by and saying hi to you. And everything you need like groceries and movie theaters is within your walking distance. I bet most americans would also prefer living like that,if given the chance.
 
Well that sucks.. Having to Live your everyday life around cars.

I much prefer american towns built before 1950s,the ones with big sidewalks,where you can actually see your neighbors walking by and saying hi to you. And everything you need like groceries and movie theaters is within your walking distance. I bet most americans would also prefer living like that,if given the chance.
Their public transport system is rotted away, and belongs to poor guys.
Infra for the poor is like African level.
A community is labeled rich or poor by existence of public service....
Old time of US is much better.
 
Well that sucks.. Having to Live your everyday life around cars.
There's an A/C hybrid electric bus that stops within 500meters of my home every 15 minutes. There's a phone app that tells me it's position so I know if I have to run to catch it. It goes straight to the last stop of the subway line where the trains also run every 3-5 minutes. If I have a car I have the option to drive to the end of the subway line and park in a garage (parking fee a few dollars) or go straight to work (parking definitely not just a few dollars).

Even 50% of NYC households have a car and that's the absolute lowest ownership rate in the U.S.

I much prefer american towns built before 1950s,the ones with big sidewalks,where you can actually see your neighbors walking by and saying hi to you. And everything you need like groceries and movie theaters is within your walking distance. I bet most americans would also prefer living like that,if given the chance.

There are grocery stores and theaters near me. However they aren't my favorites in terms of price,selection, and quality. On the weekends when its time to shop or go to the movies it's car time. With the millions of cars sold in China every year you can see others now have the same freedom of choice...and choose they will! Stores with the best will thrive as people from all over flock to them...the mediocre ones stagnate. You'll have grocery superstores with 13,000+ sq meters (well for China's population they may actually be 4 times bigger) as hubs for food shopping. With economies of scale prices will drop.

Their public transport system is rotted away, and belongs to poor guys..

You are making an incredibly sweeping generalization....
 
Last edited:
There are grocery stores and theaters near me. However they aren't my favorites in terms of price,selection, and quality. On the weekends when its time to shop or go to the movies it's car time. With the millions of cars sold in China every year you can see others now have the same freedom of choice...and choose they will! Stores with the best will thrive as people from all over flock to them...the mediocre ones stagnate. You'll have grocery superstores with 13,000+ sq meters (well for China's population they may actually be 4 times bigger) as hubs for food shopping. With such volume prices will drop.

People have freedom of choice because now they have cars?What a load of typical american logic....Well I guess cars is such a centerpiece of american lifestyle that I cann‘t blame you for thinking like that, but if you want to predict the future of chinese cities,why not take a look at Taipei or Tokyo first,Pretty sure Japan hasbeen a rich country for at least 30 years,have you seen any rich suburbs popping up around Tokyo?Do you think millions of tokyo people get on overcrowded subways is because they don’t have or cannot afford cars?What makes you think Chinese cities will become more like Los Angles and not their east asian peers?

Fact is east asian cities have been this way ever since the Song Dynasty,the richest in our history and cities at that time must be made to accommodate large popuulation and booming small businesses,that‘s why even till today you can find so many small restaurants and entertainment all in your neighborhood like sauna,karaoke,mahjong joint etc.. that's why chinese can just go out have fun while americans can only throw lame parties at home:rofl: Call it pros and cons,you can enjoy your large houses and the serenity while we can love our compact,layered,vibrant and walking friendly cities

As for the rich folks,don’t worry about their freedom of choice coz it's always granted... There are so called low density neighborhoods,mostly villas and townhouses,and theysell well,but that‘s tightly restricted by city-planing and living too far away from downtown is still a drag,so they usually end up being getaway homes for weekends. Heck,If some people still love driving around so much,they can always have the “choice” to migrate to USA! just like you did Peter:lol:

Large shopping centres may not be built,instead it‘s large warehouses for JD.com and Amazon.cn,online shopping is very convenient largely thanks to cheap and fast express delivery system that runs 24/7. Still remember the first time I ordered something from a US website,and later found out USPS dont go to work on weekends...came as a shock to me! Pacage took 5 days from CA to reach OR..Hard to imagine that in China. in fact people these days can order fresh fruits online from right where they grow,then they will be picked,wrapped and delivered to your doorstep the nextday,the shipping only cost about 4 dollars.
 
I gotta agree with the American here. Living further out to keep distance from poor people doing disgusting things in public is key to staying sane in China. We cannot and will not have so much excess like massive homes and SUVs. But we will have satellite cities for the rich and old CBD for working hours and the poor. (This is all speaking from first hand experience, by the way.)

* Andrew, Wuhan does not have so many migrant workers. Other cities are much worse.
 
I gotta agree with the American here. Living further out to keep distance from poor people doing disgusting things in public is key to staying sane in China. We cannot and will not have so much excess like massive homes and SUVs. But we will have satellite cities for the rich and old CBD for working hours and the poor. (This is all speaking from first hand experience, by the way.)

* Andrew, Wuhan does not have so many migrant workers. Other cities are much worse.

When I grew up in the city my neighbors were all families. Plenty of kids to play with. As my neighbors wealth grew they began to move up to even better places.

The people who bought the places were other families OR the family rented it out to maybe a nice 30yr old professional.

As the years went by the units around me were sold to landlords because they would outbid the families for the units.
At first they would rent it to professionals. But these professionals were always never satisfied and would jump the second they spotted a nicer place. The next strategy was to rent the unit to 2 or 3 people who were just out of college or 4 "have nots". Then it was 3 recent grads OR 5 "have nots". The schools are full of "have not" children as the professionals aren't even married.

My mother is surrounded by mostly "have nots". The rest of us have moved further out to keep our sanity. My brother and sister don't want anything to do with the place - even though it is worth well well over $1M. In fact each of us live in houses worth less than it (but newer).

When my mother dies we will either sell it to a landlord or rent it to a bunch of "have nots".

I'm further out in a suburb now surrounded by families of "haves". They ask me why I didn't stay in the city since that's where all the action is... I just shake my head.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom