Spitfighter
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Oh yes I accuse India of hypocrisy here - it is obvious.
Have we forgotten Siachen already?
No different than India's 'state policy' to support terrorists in undisputed East Pakistan and Baluchistan, along with supporting proxies in Afghanistan (Norther Alliance warlords) and Sir Lanka (LTTE).
I think I have made it amply clear above that India has been 'sooo uncooperative'. Pakistan is not the one that violated its commitments in the UNSC and refused to resolve the disputed territory of Kashmir through dialog.
Same place Taliban, Baluch militants and the East Pakistani insurgents learned them.
The support Pakistan has provided in almost eliminating cross-border infiltration and the insurgency in Kashmir belies your assertion. As of now it appears that there has been a change in state policy, based on events on the ground.
No one said anything about legitimizing terrorism, and your dialog was with Pakistan not terrorists, hence the joint statement delinking terrorism from dialog.
"Action on terrorism should not be linked to the Composite Dialogue process and these should not be bracketed."
I think the above statement is clear enough and justifies my point.
[call me stupid, but somehow I can't figure out how to multi quote a post, might need some assistance here.]
India maybe a hypocrite, but its not like we have an angel for a neighbor. That's the point I was trying to make, now if you think Pakistan has gone down its road because of India's hypocrisy, then try this on for size.
The PA intervened in Kashmir way back in 1947, Pathans from the NWFP were happily crossing over into Kashmir. India was forced to respond, now despite the fact that it was Pakistan that created the entire mess, India was willing to resolve it.
Now you call us hypocrites for not clearing up the mess you created? or it because we stopped Pakistan from gobbling up Kashmir? If this was really about 'Kashmiri Independence' then why do you have your political parties in P.o.Kashmir? Shouldn't you be running a parallel government in P.oc.K? But no, you choose to lecture us on hypocrisy while you name Pakistani occupied Kashmir 'Azad Kashmir'
If tomorrow India becomes a member of the UNSC and vetoes the resolution will that too be acceptable to you? Lets not fool ourselves here, Pakistan wanted Kashmir, its common sense, India didn't let that happen so Pakistan launched the world's most hypocritical campaign of 'Independence'. Pakistan is not the victim and its hands are not clean, not by a long shot.
Now don't get me wrong, I understand Pakistan isn't happy with the status quo and having an enemy at the doorstep doesn't make sense for either one of us. But if we're ever going to find a way I think we should being by first have to getting off our self righteous moral high horse. Like Musharraff said, the past has been dirty, but its time to move on, so lets do exactly that.
India cannot resolve anything while Kashmiri terrorists groups are active in Pakistan. It will legitimize everything they have fought for and there is an India outside of Kashmir. Once the bombing stops, the talking starts.
{1947, 65 == 1971.
Kashmir == Bangladesh
Baluchistan == Khalistan
Kargil ? (Siachen wasn't occupied by the PA)
OH! what's this?, India is clearly less hypocritical! }