What's new

Manmohan Singh takes stock of country’s nuclear arsenal

Firemaster

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
India on Monday took stock of its nuclear arsenal and delivery systems like long-range ballistic missiles, fighter-bombers and warships towards its quest to have an operational nuclear triad — the capability to fire nukes from land, sea and air — in the near future. Sources said the top-level meet held by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was “not just a general security review” but in fact a full-fledged Nuclear Command Authority (NCA) conference to assess the steps being taken to consolidate and strengthen India’s “minimum but credible nuclear deterrence”.

The status of two crucial but delayed “strategic programmes”, the 5,000-km-range Agni-V missile and indigenous nuclear submarine INS Arihant, is said to have figured in the discussion apart from “overarching strategic issues”.

While the three-stage Agni-V is to be tested later this year, INS Arihant is also slated to go for “harbour and sea trials” once its miniature 83 MW pressurized light-water reactor gains “full criticality”. The defence establishment is eager to induct INS Arihant, armed with 12 nuclear-tipped missiles, by next year because it will constitute the most effective and difficult-to-detect leg of the nuclear triad.

The NCA meeting was attended by defence minister A K Antony, national security advisor Shiv Shankar Menon , DRDO chief V K Saraswat and the three Service chiefs, Air Chief Marshal P V Naik, Admiral Nirmal Verma and General V K Singh, among others.

It comes close after ISI chief Lt-General Shuja Pasha’s threat that Pakistan would give a befitting response to any Indian attempt to launch any Abbottabad-like operation since targets inside India “had already been identified” and “rehearsals” carried out.

This sabre-rattling comes in the backdrop of Pakistan furiously building up its nuclear arsenal, which already stands at an estimated 70 to 90 warheads compared to India’s 60 to 80.

Pakistan’s two new heavy-water reactors coming up at its Khushab nuclear facility are clearly geared towards producing weapons-grade plutonium to supplement its ongoing enriched uranium-based nuke programme, as reported by TOI earlier.

What has added to global concerns is the fear that jihadis may gain access to “loose nukes”, enriched uranium or nuclear technology to make “dirty bombs” in the ever-deepening mess Pakistan finds itself in.

India, however, does not want to engage in a verbal spat with Pakistan. This much was evident with sources emphasizing the NCA meeting on Monday was “a routine pre-scheduled exercise” held once every three-to-six months to review the management of India’s nuclear arsenal.

Pakistan does not have a clear-cut “no first-use” nuclear doctrine like India, having left it deliberately vague to unsettle India’s conventional military superiority. Moreover, it’s Army chief General Pervez Kayani who has his finger on the nuclear button in Pakistan.

In India, the NCA is controlled by the civilian leadership, with the “political council” led by the PM being the “sole body which can authorize the use of nuclear weapons”. The NCA’s executive council, headed by the NSA, only provides inputs and “execute the directives” given to it by the political council. There are, of course, “alternate chains of command” for retaliatory nuclear strikes if the political leadership is “decapitated” in a pre-emptive first strike by an adversary.

Both the NCA and the tri-Service Strategic Forces Command (SFC), which manages the nuclear arsenal, were created in January 2003 after the 10-month troop mobilization along the Indo-Pak border under Operation Parakram in the wake of the December 2001 terror strike on Parliament.
Manmohan Singh takes stock of country’s nuclear arsenal | idrw.org
 
.
We need to have 200 AGNI's.
5 Arihant class submarines with 60 SLBM's.
40 rafales for nuclear bombing in next 10 years.
 
.
I dont care if anything else comes or not into the Indian military.

But we need INS Arihant and INS Chakra AT ANY COST.
 
.
I dont know , but I have a strong believe in India's increasing Might. People use to bash Our Nation a lot. But What I think is India soon become a country of Big muscles and the process will remain continue. Its good to have a new wave of professionalism in Indian Leaders regarding Defence Isuues. There are lots of continuous development are on right track and definitely We will see its positive impact in coming decades.
 
. . . .
First of all we need guts a real PM not a puppet.
Even if the things were going on schedule they may hide it to the world.
Buildings 200 agnis can be possible in 10 years.
We already ordered fresh batch of mki's for special nuclear delivery purposes and SFC's 40 planes would raplace it.
But 5 nuke subs in 10 years seems impossible .
Though non nuclear subs, they should have capability to launch slbms with nuclear war heads.
 
.
we need hypersonic cruise missiles with ranges of more than 3500+ Kms rather than making agni IIAT etc.
 
.
We also need 6 to 10 nuclear submarines which can fire upto 12 to 24 missiles with ranges 6000+Kms
 
.
First of all we need guts a real PM not a puppet.

I am sick and tired of the same post in almost every thread. is this the forum you need to show your frustration. I did not mean or take sides here but being rational on staying on topic is also required.
 
.
With all the super computers and latest infrastructure in DRDO, I wont be surprised if the yield of our nuclear weapons is increased 10 fold.
 
.
INS Arihant'c reactor not fully critical yet? Its long time ... Or the submarine is already in deep waters??? Any clarity?
 
.
we need hypersonic cruise missiles with ranges of more than 3500+ Kms rather than making agni IIAT etc.
Cruise missiles are more costlier and requires much tech.It has many limitations . It cannot move in all types of weather.They are generally meant for sea but can be used on land in spl cases. Do you think we can send a cruise missiles in himalayas? We can make a combo of that like shaurya ie not purely ballistic.
We also need 6 to 10 nuclear submarines which can fire upto 12 to 24 missiles with ranges 6000+Kms
We need more nuke subs than 10 also with good range operational slbm's. But it takes much time to make these. We should try to have as many subs of the same class.
INS Arihant'c reactor not fully critical yet? Its long time ... Or the submarine is already in deep waters??? Any clarity?
Its under sea trials and more over slbm's will only be installed in it after we successfully conduct those tests and induct them.
 
.
We need to have 200 AGNI's.
5 Arihant class submarines with 60 SLBM's.
40 rafales for nuclear bombing in next 10 years.

Against China-Yes

Against Pakistan- No

India & Pakistan are not like US & USSR divided by thousands of kilometers of land and sea, we are just divided by a line in the sand. Nuclear fallout in one country can drift across border and harm the other country, even non-participant states. We cannot destroy Lahore without sacrificing Amritsar.

Frankly i don't get the Pakistani obsession with having more nuclear warheads than India as 15-20 nuclear strikes can blow the whole of South Asia skyhigh. I pray that whoever in charge of nuclear button on bothsides of the border will chose reason over emotion.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom