let us not use "we" to describe india as the indian establishment view is not shared by all people living in india nor they do wish to become party to any such nato-involved conspiracy.
incorrect.
from (
The Nepali Revolution and International Relations )...
obviously not everyone.
pro indian
establishment and pro sangh.
why a "little more power"?? there should be no monarchy at all... socialism should be what governs nepal... if the communist party there has been distracted, they should get back to basic principles.
1. in 2011, libya was invaded by 40+ militaries of nato ( capitalist-imperialists and reactionaries ) preceeded for months before by nato's terrorist affiliates.
2. similar case is of syria, with nato's technical invasion supposed to have taken place in mid-2013 but not done so because of russia's deal arrangement ( dismantling of syria's chemical weapons ).
3. until end of august 1969, libya was a monarcy, ruled by the king idris, a nato puppet... on september the 1st, libya saw a socialist revolution ( the "al fatah revolution" ) and in time became a true democracy, governed by the jamahiriya system... jamahiriya is rule by the people, a unique system (
Libya: From Africa’s Wealthiest Democracy to US-NATO Terror Haven ).
4. syria is a socialist system.