What's new

Manhattan Blast A Terror Attack, Suspect Possibly From Bangladesh: NY Police

Hindu values are obviously superior, but I never said that, YOU did.
And there we have it...ur self righteousness and delusions of grandeur are slowly creeping out.

I am only seeking clarification on your stand that its ok to be cruel as long as you eat that creature.

You however are unable to say this with a clear conscious and is beating around the bush.
I'm beating around the bush? Do u know how to read? Or is that u can't comprehend what u have just read...

Since u r slow, I'll help u out. You made the retarded claim that exploding a cow's mouth off is the same as cow slaughter for the consumption of meat.

Post #8 "How is he any different from a man who slaughters that cow or eats that cow ?"

To this I replied in literally the next post...
Post #9 "Quit equating the two things. Not everyone adheres to ur beliefs. Animal slaughter for the purpose of eating is nothing like this heinous act. The sole purpose here was to hurt the poor animal."

So where is the beating around the bush? I said it right then and there...that those two things are not the same. Unlike u I don't hide behind things and pursue some secret agenda of superiority. I can say it straight to ur face that what u said is plain retarded.

No need to quote me again. You already were and are off topic and since u lack some basic comprehension skills, I'm not interested in debating with u anymore.
 
.
And there we have it...ur self righteousness and delusions of grandeur are slowly creeping out.

LOL.... I am entitled to my views, without being accused of righteousness or grandeur.

If you are intolerant of my views, that is your problem, not mine.

I'm beating around the bush? Do u know how to read? Or is that u can't comprehend what u have just read...

Since u r slow, I'll help u out. You made the retarded claim that exploding a cow's mouth off is the same as cow slaughter for the consumption of meat.

Post #8 "How is he any different from a man who slaughters that cow or eats that cow ?"

To this I replied in literally the next post...
Post #9 "Quit equating the two things. Not everyone adheres to ur beliefs. Animalslaughter for the purpose of eating isnothing like this heinous act. The solepurpose here was to hurt the poor animal."

So where is the beating around the bush? I said it right then and there...that those two things are not the same. Unlike u I don't hide behind things and pursue some secret agenda of superiority. I can say it straight to ur face that what u said is plain retarded.

No need to quote me again. You already were and are off topic and since u lack some basic comprehension skills, I'm not interested in debating with u anymore.

Your position is "The sole purpose here was to hurt the poor animal" is wrong, as opposed to "the multiple purpose of hurting the poor animal and eating it" which is Right.

Just say that with a straight face and end the debate.

Its as simple as that.
 
. .
Today's NYC attempted suicide bomber has been named as 27 years old Akayed Ullah, from Bangladesh on diversity visa. ...
Subhanallah . There are two pics of Muslims’s new hero .
1f609.png
;)

so much for multi cultralism ... looks like trump was actually right after all
1f61b.png
:P
1f609.png
;)

View attachment 442127

View attachment 442128

View attachment 442129
OOpps
http://www.bapa.me/
 
.
.
How is he any different from a man who slaughters that cow or eats that cow ?

Slaughtering any animal like pig, cow, chicken, duck, rabbit, frog etc is same as its usually results in quick death. But badly injuring and left to suffer for prolonged time must be inhuman.. At least in my book.
 
Last edited:
. .
You're being stupid with that argument
Lol he is still going strong with his stupidity...read his post #34

"So factually speaking that person who was cruel to that cow but allowed it to Live is actually more humane that the man who kills that cow and eats it.

Don't believe me ? Just ask the cow."

Lol he wants us to ask the cow :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
I can't win with rational thinkers like you. I am from the school of thought where if a horse/ dog /pet etc is suffering too much, I will prefer to put it out of its misery by a quick gun-shot....

In short you choose your convenience over their choice to live.

The only misery you are ending is your own. Not the animals, so do not pretend its some grand gesture.

It's a choice between being herbivore, carnivore or omnivore.. So between a vegetarian & non-vegetarian, this "chicken first or egg first" debate will always be there. So no more argument in that line...

Personally I believe, we are omnivores and I practice the same, vigorously i.e. (I eat/ or am willing to eat everything that humankind all around the globe eats, except cannibalism of course).. So my logic will be understood only by people who indulges in, at-least, non-vegetarianism...

Your personal choice is irrelevant. It matters only to you, nobody else.

Logic however is universal and is not related to individuals choices. Its based on facts and reasoning.

If you are looking to win a popularity contest, then that is a different story. Stop pretending that "logic" has anything to do with it.

Lol he is still going strong with his stupidity...read his post #34

"So factually speaking that person who was cruel to that cow but allowed it to Live is actually more humane that the man who kills that cow and eats it.

Don't believe me ? Just ask the cow."

Learning to talk to animals is not that hard. Millions of people do it all the time.

You just have to learn to listen. Step one is to empty that hot air.
 
.
In short you choose your convenience over their choice to live.

The only misery you are ending is your own. Not the animals, so do not pretend its some grand gesture.



Your personal choice is irrelevant. It matters only to you, nobody else.

Logic however is universal and is not related to individuals choices. Its based on facts and reasoning.

If you are looking to win a popularity contest, then that is a different story. Stop pretending that "logic" has anything to do with it.

Logic has everything to do with my practice. Humans have both canine & molar teeth, hence we are omnivores..
 
.
Science is BUILT on Logic. Logic is not built on science.

If you had better logical ability, you would have understood that sentence.
I truly feel sorry for u. Ur low IQ must make it hard for u to grasp such simple concepts. Let me use ur own words to defeat ur own argument...

Ur argument in post 46
"Biology has nothing to do with Logic"

Ur statement in post 50
"Science is BUILT on Logic"

U just defeated ur own argument. Go read a book or something and argue with me when u finally know how to debate. Contradicting urself just four posts later doesn't bode well as far as ur intelligence is concerned.
 
.
The suspect will be servicing Afro-American 'Steaks' for a long long time in American jail. That is the only steak he is going to be served and before long, he will start loving it.

Well good for him. They do serve a steak every week in US prisons. You do know that? Munching on a nice veal as I type this.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom