What's new

Malala’s attacker was held, freed in 2009: sources

Amaa'n

STAFF
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Messages
10,660
Reaction score
149
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
ISLAMABAD: The alleged organiser of the shooting of Malala Yousufzai, claimed by Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), was captured during a 2009 military offensive against the group but was released after three months, two senior officials told Reuters.

They identified the man who planned the attack on 14-year-old Malala only as Ataullah, and said he was one of the two gunmen who shot her on a school bus this month in the Swat Valley.

Believed to be in his 30s, Ataullah is on the run and may have fled to neighbouring Afghanistan, they said. He organised the attack on the orders of one of the Taliban’s most feared commanders, Mullah Fazlullah, officials said.

Critics say Pakistan’s low conviction rate of militants, even high-profile ones who are alleged to have carried out major attacks, is one reason why extremism has spread in the South Asian nation.

The attack on Malala, an advocate of education for girls, has drawn widespread condemnation and raised fresh questions about Pakistan’s commitment to fighting militancy.

Doctors treating her in Britain have said Malala, a symbol of resistance to Taliban efforts to deprive girls of education, has every chance of making a “good recovery” after being shot in the head.

The Taliban have said they attacked her because she spoke out against the group and praised US President Barack Obama.

The two officials said Ataullah was detained by security forces after a 2009 Pakistani military campaign pushed the Taliban out of the Swat Valley.

“He spent three months in the custody of security forces but was freed after no evidence (of wrongdoing) was found,” one official said.

The second source, a senior security official, said authorities had gathered enough evidence to arrest Ataullah after raiding his house in the Swat Valley, a former tourist attraction.

If Ataullah is in Afghanistan, finding him could be difficult. Some of the world’s most dangerous militants have operated in the Pak-Afghan border area for years, a forbidding area hard for security forces to reach.

The officials said Pakistani security forces were trying other ways to bring him to justice.

“His mother and two brothers were taken into custody to force him to surrender,” said the second senior official. “Also two other close relatives of Ataullah have been taken into custody because we heard he spent the night in their house after his escape from Swat.”

Melted away

The second official said Ataullah was not a hardcore militant, only a sympathiser when he was arrested in 2009.

The Taliban commander in charge in Swat was Fazlullah, who melted away during the crackdown and eventually moved to Afghanistan with some of his fighters.

From there, he has orchestrated cross-border raids against Pakistani government forces and has again emerged as a major security threat, security sources have said.

The Taliban, fighting to topple the government and impose a radical theocracy, have blown up hundreds of girls schools in recent years in Swat and other areas to further their opposition to the education of women.

Police and security officials say dozens of suspects were arrested after the Taliban gunmen shot Malala, including four employees of her school. Two of them were released.

Public fury over the shooting has increased pressure on the Pakistani military to mount a major offensive against the Taliban, which is close to Al Qaeda and a host of other militant groups.

While many Pakistanis were outraged by the attack on Malala, some leaders of religious parties described the assault as an American conspiracy designed to trigger a military offensive against militant groups based in the North Waziristan tribal region, hundreds of miles to the southwest of Swat.

Washington has repeatedly urged Pakistan to mount a full-scale offensive in North Waziristan, home to the most hardcore militant opponents of the United States. The government has argued the military is too stretched fighting the Taliban elsewhere and consolidating gains from previous crackdowns.

Swat has been held up as a model of counter-insurgency efforts. But critics say the government has failed to follow up with large-scale investment needed to create jobs and industries to keep the Taliban from gaining new recruits.

The second senior official said Malala’s father, Ziauddin Yousufzai, had been told about threats to her life after two militants close to Ataullah were interrogated following their arrest in Swat two months ago.

“Ziauddin was properly informed two months ago about serious threats to Malala’s life and was even offered security which he refused,” said a third official, a senior police officer.

The father earlier told Reuters he refused police protection for Malala because he wanted her to live a normal life and that it was not permitted for men to spend time with a young girl in Swat’s conservative society.


P.S: How many more lives will be taken when our Parliament and Judiciary will finally wake up? the attacker and leader of Kamra base attack was also arrested back in the days but latter release due to the lack of evidence, and now this.
I wonder what the same Judiciary and Parliament would have said if Army would have executed the guy at the very same place. he would have been tagged as innocent and victim of Extra Judicial killing,


Source : Dawn News
 
So much for 'lanat' on the faces of government, political parties, courts as well civilians.

Let the army and intelligence do their job, by any means we wish for. The 'missing persons' cases are same as this, once the courts give them bail, we are let with no choice but to kidnap them and keep in our military jails. They are a threat to the people of the country, and unless we do something, nothing will change. But well, if you think otherwise, then you are paying for what you sow i.e. are against the military secretly arresting militants.
 
Why aren't these clowns hung on the spot?!? :hitwall:

This was done initially, the captured terrorists, were taken to a undisclosed location, interrogated , and shot dead. One or two videos leaked out, and there was political chaos against the army by everyone, including the political parties, political talk show clowns and normal public. Hence, they were then started to produce after the courts, who issued them bails.
 
So much for 'lanat' on the faces of government, political parties, courts as well civilians.

Let the army and intelligence do their job, by any means we wish for. The 'missing persons' cases are same as this, once the courts give them bail, we are let with no choice but to kidnap them and keep in our military jails. They are a threat to the people of the country, and unless we do something, nothing will change. But well, if you think otherwise, then you are paying for what you sow i.e. are against the military secretly arresting militants.



If politicians will allow Judiciary to be stronger , The judiciary will wrap politician into it (As we know How our politicians are). So better have weak judiciary where "Terrorist" also enjoy freedom so does "Politicians"


Strong Judiciary is only in favor of Common ppl, strong ppl need weak judiciary..

Similar example: If Indian judiciary would have killed " Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British national of Pakistani origin", Daniel Pearl would be alive. We have weak judiciary.
 
How far is the Western media responsible for the attack on this very brave little girl? Have they not used her as a merchnadise to sell the news? Was it necessary to get her interviewed and have that broadcast all over the world? Wasn't that sure to invite trouble for her?
 
This is to be expected when we have judiciary and a poor investigative police system like this.

Same is happening to some extent in Balochistan. Terrorists and criminals are caught by the agencies, conveniently termed 'missing persons' (as if anyone tells their family before going for terror activity), and judiciary then puts pressure on the agencies to release these folks or put them into the flawed system for a trial, the same system which awarded that Lal Masjid crackpot freedom among countless others.
 
A practical demonstration of what happens when your judiciary does not try terrorists and you grill the Army/Intel for holding them anyway....................There was a similar incident when the planner of the RA Bazar Blast was acquitted by the courts and later went on to plan/execute the assassination of Surgeon General AMC Mushtaq Ahmed Baig.
 
A practical demonstration of what happens when your judiciary does not try terrorists and you grill the Army/Intel for holding them anyway....................There was a similar incident when the planner of the RA Bazar Blast was acquitted by the courts and later went on to plan/execute the assassination of Surgeon General AMC Mushtaq Ahmed Baig.
That's why I sometimes support fake encounters. If you have damning evidence and judiciary fails to deliver justice and risk lives of people due to its ineptness, these fake encounters should be carried out.

Sometimes in real world, you have to do the right act instead of moral act.
 
That was the right thing to do: the judiciary must acquit if there is not enough evidence. It is the prosecution's job to build a proper case.

We do not become barbarians just because we are fighting barbarians. Rule of law must prevail at all times; we must not descend into a lynch mob mentality.
So if someone fails to prove someone which is caught guilty but freed due to some technicality, we should free him and risk other people's lives.

There has been many cases where due to faults of security personals, the major evidence are rejected as per law. Except those evidence, there is nothing to prove the man is guilty and hence he goes free.

We are not saying to do vigilante justice but when it comes to terrorists, we should have different laws and strictest procedures to see all the aspects. We need special courts for this.
 
A practical demonstration of what happens when your judiciary does not try terrorists and you grill the Army/Intel for holding them anyway....................There was a similar incident when the planner of the RA Bazar Blast was acquitted by the courts and later went on to plan/execute the assassination of Surgeon General AMC Mushtaq Ahmed Baig.


Hate to say this. But our experience with the Talibaboon clearly shows that these vermin are "enemy combatants" engaged in war against Pakistan.

And thus, we may not be able to try them in civilian courts.

Have any of you been to our lower courts? like district magisterate's or a session judge's?

Those courts are not set up for prosecuting enemy combatants. The prosecutors, the prison guards/police, the judges are powerless in the face of these monsters.

Therefore we must establish military courts and try these animals under military law. After they are tried, they should either be shot, or put in long term "facilities" established in remote areas. We may have to go to UN for a discussion/agreement, but ultimately we have to change the way we are prosecuting enemy combatants. We must.


Otherwise we have to live with the catch-release-Jih@di-attacks/murders-catch-release-murder cycle forever.



peace
 
So if someone fails to prove someone which is caught guilty but freed due to some technicality, we should free him and risk other people's lives.

There's always another side to every coin.

In Afghanistan, there are allegations that some of the people killed in NATO raids were victims of deliberately false 'tips' provided by business or tribal rivals. It's a tough choice, which is why I will let the people living in Pakistan discuss it.
 
Back
Top Bottom