What's new

Mahmud Ghaznavi, the Afghan-Pak Sultan

6f9ebd86e2ac59a67b39bf088926dce7.jpg
What is there to be butt hurt.if you think someone ransacking someone's religious place has done a great job,then we know what's the mindset you have ,it's not butt hurt it's pity my friend
 
.
What is there to be butt hurt.if you think someone ransacking someone's religious place has done a great job,then we know what's the mindset you have ,it's not butt hurt it's pity my friend
No No No My friend , Worshiping Lingam is a great job. :enjoy:
 
. .
What's there to be great about him or what he did,unless you think the religion he followed and his god will be proud of him disrespecting others faith.

He finds it amusing.

Anyway, they were at war and so this is perfectly acceptable.

Ghaznavi had Hindu soldiers who certainly seemed to have no qualms with this.

At least knowing what you worship is better than not knowing what you worship looks like

That concept only works if it looks good, which is a case that cannot be made for your idols that's for sure.

Anyway, even if they did look nice (I'm sure some of them do), it would still be better to leave your deity's appearance unknown as beauty is in the eye of the beholder. A statue you find beautiful could be considered disturbing by others, why depict your deity and risk disgusting people in the first place?
 
.
Early Turkish migration of different tribes, and creating various states as the move westward continued.

There was of course the Karakhanids/Karahanlilar before the Ghaznavids, the mass adoption to Islam after this point
 
Last edited:
. .
A man who killed people of other faiths and pillaged their worshipping sites (doesn't sound very Islamic to me) is being glorified in this thread. And the funny thing is that the lot I'm seeing here appreciating his acts are also the ones who repeatedly condemn (as it should be) the violence against Muslims and the destruction of mosques in the Middle East and India. Nothing surprises me anymore.

Reminds me of that saying "tumhara kutta kutta, maira kutta Tommy"
 
.
A man who killed people of other faiths and pillaged their worshipping sites (doesn't sound very Islamic to me) is being glorified in this thread. And the funny thing is that the lot I'm seeing here appreciating his acts are also the ones who repeatedly condemn (as it should be) the violence against Muslims and the destruction of mosques in the Middle East and India. Nothing surprises me anymore.

Reminds me of that saying "tumhara kutta kutta, maira kutta Tommy"

He was at war, under such circumstances it is Islamically acceptable to do such things. Are you even aware what the early Muslims did to Dhul Khalasa?

We condemn violence against Muslim women, children and elderly because we most certainly wouldn't do the same to non Muslims. As for Masjids being destroyed, we certainly dislike it but don't call it a crime against humanity. We only find it odd how the same countries preach secularism but clearly don't practise it, and lament us for destroying places of worship of other faiths while they destroy ours. It's a bewildering form of hypocrisy.
 
.
What is there to be butt hurt.if you think someone ransacking someone's religious place has done a great job,then we know what's the mindset you have ,it's not butt hurt it's pity my friend

The same people get angry when you mention Ranjit used mosques as horse stables
 
. .
He was at war, under such circumstances it is Islamically acceptable to do such things. Are you even aware what the early Muslims did to Dhul Khalasa?

We condemn violence against Muslim women, children and elderly because we most certainly wouldn't do the same to non Muslims. As for Masjids being destroyed, we certainly dislike it but don't call it a crime against humanity. We only find it odd how the same countries preach secularism but clearly don't practise it, and lament us for destroying places of worship of other faiths while they destroy ours. It's a bewildering form of hypocrisy.

Being at war does not justify the killing of innocents and destruction of religious sites (from the Prophet PBUH's last sermon). Don't know where you read that it's allowed in Islam. And even if it was can you think of anything more disgraceful than to plunder and loot them ? It is most certainly a crime against humanity. How would you feel if Israeli's were glorified for their actions against Muslims ?
As for your arguement about secularism (youve resorted to whataboutism btw) could you quote one incident where mosques were destroyed by the govt of a secular country ?
 
. . . .
Ghaznawi was a Persianised Turk and king of Khorasan. His army consisted overwhelmingly Pashtuns, Turks and Persians of current day Afghanistan. His kingdom consisted of entire of present day Afghanistan, entire of present day Tajikistan, parts of Iran, parts of Pakistan, small part of Uzbekistan and some minor Turkic countries.

He wasn't an ethnic Afghan, and definitely not Pakistani. He was a Turk from then Khorasan.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom