What's new

Maersk CEO Reveals ‘Ironic’ Twist in U.S. Trade War With China

= Strawman + no true scotsman

You said the article was stupid, when it was merely reporting what the CEO said.

Are you now insinuating that the bloomberg reporter was falsifying Mr Skou's words?

I am not insinuating, I am telling you, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.
 
.
I am not insinuating, I am telling you, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.
What does the article title say?
 
.
What does the article title say?

Did I say the title say that?

I said, if this title is quoting on what Mr Skou said, the TITLE SHOULD BE " MAERSK CEO DISCUSS TRADE VOLUME IN 2018" I never said the title say "US loses trade war" or "Trade war hurt US more than China"

Read the article, please.
 
. .
Hahaha ya now found yourself stuck at the dead end of the alley?



About what?

No, you are stuck in the dead end.

Read the article again, the article mentioned this

The Maersk CEO also warned that China is having an easier time finding substitutes for U.S. products than the U.S. is in replacing Chinese imports

and this

According to Skou, that should leave Trump with little choice but to strike a deal with China, which he says may come “within the next quarters.”

But no where in the whole article the author "Quote" have Mr Skou said US is in a harder position to replace China then vice versa, and US is force to set a deal with China.

Now do tell me which and where did Mr Skou said those word, and I gladly retract my statement.
 
.
Did I say the title say that?

I said, if this title is quoting on what Mr Skou said, the TITLE SHOULD BE " MAERSK CEO DISCUSS TRADE VOLUME IN 2018" I never said the title say "US loses trade war" or "Trade war hurt US more than China"

Read the article, please.
= Strawman after strawman

The article's content was on the US's inability to cut down imports from China despite the ongoing trade war, as can be seen in in the article's very first paragraph:





The man running the world’s largest container-shipping company says he has access to data that shows Donald Trump has so far failed to wean the U.S. off Chinese imports.

The article then goes on to quote The CEO's words for its entirety behind this.

You said the article was stupid, therefore insinuating that The CEO was stupid.

Henceworth, a stupid CEO needs to be replaced, and what other suitable person to replace him other than the one who highlighted his stupidity.

I repeat:

Im expecting Maersk's shares to skyrocket after your appointment, CEO jhungary.
 
.
= Strawman after strawman

The article's content was on the US's inability to cut down imports from China despite the ongoing trade war, as can be seen in in the article's very first paragraph:







The article then goes on to quote The CEO's words for its entirety behind this.

You said the article was stupid, therefore insinuating that The CEO was stupid.

Henceworth, a stupid CEO needs to be replaced, and what other suitable person to replace him other than the one who highlighted his stupidity.

I repeat:

Im expecting Maersk's shares to skyrocket after your appointment, CEO jhungary.

The man running the world’s largest container-shipping company says he has access to data that shows Donald Trump has so far failed to wean the U.S. off Chinese imports.

umm, Mr Skou didn't even said that, thanks for reminding me lol

And if you think the article actually did quote what Mr Skou said, lay it out on me why can't you?

Or you may as well just be as Smoosh as the author lol

Smooshy Wannabe LOL
 
.
umm, Mr Skou didn't even said that, thanks for reminding me lol
Yes.

The main point of the article was about the US's inability to cut imports from china while china has an easy time finding substitues for US imports.

Who's winning the trade war? Based on the above, Its up to individual interpretation lol.


You, my friend, gave away your subcobcious eagerness to see china lose the trade war with your interpretation of who is winning and losing it.

You said the article was stupid, henceforth- the CEO was stupid.

Thus, you are smarter than the CEO, just like most of your other posts following a similar pattern here on various topics in this forum.

I repeat:

Im expecting Maersk's shares to skyrocket sfter your appointment, CEO jhungary.
 
.
Yes.

The main point of the article was about the US's inability to cut imports from china while china has an easy time finding substitues for US imports.

Who's winning the trade war? Based on the above, Its up to individual interpretation lol.

Did he said that? Nope. This is what Mr Skou actually said in the Article

“The large U.S. importers aren’t considering building new factories in the U.S.,” he said. “What they are considering is whether they can buy in Vietnam, Bangladesh or India.”

So, does Mr Skou actually say US have a hard time finding substitute, and China have a easier time finding substitutes for US import? How? When Mr Skou didn't even mention China regarding US import at all.

LOL How fail it was?

You, my friend, gave away your subcobcious eagerness to see china lose the trade war with your interpretation of who is winning and losing it.

You said the article was stupid, henceforth- the CEO was stupid.

Thus, you are smarter than the CEO, just like most of your other posts following a similar pattern here on various topics in this forum.

I repeat:

Im expecting Maersk's shares to skyrocket sfter your appointment, CEO jhungary.

Well, I didn't say US win the Trade war or China win the trade war. People know me and follow my view would tell you my view is NOBODY will win a trade war. I am simply saying this article is stupid because it misinterpret what Mr Skou said either by default or by design, and that is stupid, and if you cannot see it, and most important of all, cannot show me where Mr Skou actaully say what the article meant, then this applies to you as well.

It's that simple.

Again, please do tell where in the article did Mr Skou say "US is losing the trade war" or "Trade war hurt US more than China? ""

Smooshy:omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
Did he said that? Nope. This is what Mr Skou actually said in the Article


So, does Mr Skou actually say US have a hard time finding substitute, and China have a easier time finding substitutes for US import? How? When Mr Skou didn't even mention China regarding US import at all.

LOL How fail it was?



Well, I didn't say US win the Trade war or China win the trade war. People know me and follow my view would tell you my view is NOBODY will win a trade war. I am simply saying this article is stupid because it misinterpret what Mr Skou said either by default or by design, and that is stupid, and if you cannot see it, and most important of all, cannot show me where Mr Skou actaully say what the article meant, then this applies to you as well.

It's that simple.

Again, please do tell where in the article did Mr Skou say "US is losing the trade war" or "Trade war hurt US more than China? ""

Smooshy:omghaha::omghaha:
Hahahhahaa kiddie kiddie, trollie trollie:

The man running the world’s largest container-shipping company says he has access to data that shows Donald Trump has so far failed to wean the U.S. off Chinese imports.

The Maersk CEO also warned that China is having an easier time finding substitutes for U.S. products than the U.S. is in replacing Chinese imports.

Wanna keep lying after even getting caught with your pants down? Hahaha.


Again, please do tell where in the article did Mr Skou say "US is losing the trade war" or "Trade war hurt US more than China? ""
=Strawman

Exactly. Who said it? The answer is here:

At no time in the article the CEO of Maersk CEO claim US is losing the trade war or even trade war is bad for the US.
= Some CEO-wannabe first brought this into the topic in post #17

Hahahhahaa kiddie kiddie, trollie trollie:





Wanna keep lying after even getting caught with your pants down? Hahaha.



=Strawman

Exactly. Who said it? The answer is here:


= Some CEO-wannabe first brought this into the topic in post #17
Keep lying.

Kiddie kiddie, trollie trollie, says the CEO-wannabe.
 
.
Hahahhahaa kiddie kiddie, trollie trollie:





Wanna keep lying after even getting caught with your pants down? Hahaha.



=Strawman

Exactly. Who said it? The answer is here:


= Some CEO-wannabe first brought this into the topic in post #17

So, you still don't have the answer for me?

I get it, you are smooshy :)

hey smooshy smooshy Singa Chinese Wannabe :)
 
. .
Thats right, i take this as culling your tail inwards between your butt cheeks now.

Well, I am not that smooshy for not answering my question.

I mean how hard can it be to shut me up? You simply show me where did Mr Skou said those word, I you can shut me up for good, the article is not that long, it's not gonna take you 2 hours to finish reading it, that did beg the question, why not?

Well, that;s because you are smooshy LOL
 
.
Well, I am not that smooshy for not answering my question.

I mean how hard can it be to shut me up? You simply show me where did Mr Skou said those word, I you can shut me up for good, the article is not that long, it's not gonna take you 2 hours to finish reading it, that did beg the question, why not?

Well, that;s because you are smooshy LOL
I posted it above.

You evading the answers has got nth to do with me.

Thats right, keep avoiding

Thanks, CEO-wannabe.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom