What's new

Louvre Abu Dhabi - Salvator Mundi (Leonardo da Vinci)

Bubblegum Crisis

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
2,612
Reaction score
5
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
United Arab Emirates
...





@Saif al-Arab

Yes ! Yes ! Yes ! Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ! ^^


House of Wisdom


Quote :

Mystery Buyer of $450 Million ‘Salvator Mundi’ Was a Saudi Prince

By David D. Kirkpatrick
Dec. 6, 2017

LONDON —
He is a little-known Saudi prince from a remote branch of the royal family, with no history as a major art collector, and no publicly known source of great wealth. But the prince, Bader bin Abdullah bin Mohammed bin Farhan al-Saud, is the mystery buyer of Leonardo da Vinci’s painting “Salvator Mundi,” which fetched a record $450.3 million at auction last month, documents show.

The revelation that Prince Bader is the purchaser, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times, links one of the most captivating mysteries of the art world with palace intrigues in Saudi Arabia that are shaking the region. Prince Bader splurged on this controversial and decidedly un-Islamic portrait of Christ at a time when most members of the Saudi elite, including some in the royal family, are cowering under a sweeping crackdown against corruption and self-enrichment.

As it happens, Prince Bader is a friend and associate of the leader of the purge: the country’s 32-year-old crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.

The $450.3 million purchase is the clearest indication yet of the selective nature of the crackdown. The crown prince’s supporters portray him as a reformer, but the campaign of extrajudicial arrests has been unprecedented for modern Saudi Arabia, worrying Western governments about political stability in the world’s largest oil producer, alarming rights advocates and investors about the rule of law, and roiling energy markets.

Prince Mohammed’s consolidation of power has upended decades of efforts by previous Saudi rulers to build loyalty and consensus within the royal family. And even before the disclosure of the record-breaking purchase in a New York art auction by one of his associates, Prince Mohammed’s extravagance had already raised eyebrows, most notably with the impulse purchase two years ago in the south of France of a Russian vodka titan’s 440-foot yacht, for half a billion dollars.

A spokeswoman for Christie’s, the auction house that sold “Salvator Mundi,” said it did not comment on the identities of any buyers or sellers without their permission. Prince Bader did not respond to a detailed request for comment. But as The Times was pressing for a response on Wednesday, the newly opened branch of the Louvre in Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates, tweeted that the painting “is coming to Louvre Abu Dhabi.” The Saudi crown prince is a close ally of his counterpart in Abu Dhabi.

Documents provided from inside Saudi Arabia and reviewed by The Times reveal that representatives for the buyer, Prince Bader, did not present him as a bidder until the day before the sale. He was such an unknown figure that executives at Christie’s were scrambling to establish his identity and his financial means. And even after he had provided a $100 million deposit to qualify for the auction, the Christie’s lawyers conducting due diligence on potential bidders pressed him with two pointed questions:

Where did he get the money? And what was his relationship with the Saudi ruler, King Salman?

Real estate, Prince Bader replied, without elaborating. He was just one of 5,000 princes, he told the auction house, according to documents and people involved.

Less than two weeks earlier, on Nov. 4, the crown prince had ordered the crackdown on more than 200 of the richest Saudi princes, businessmen and government officials. The kingdom had been squeezed by years of low oil prices, and Prince Mohammed was seeking to recover hundreds of billions of dollars in alleged illicit gains.

“Salvator Mundi” represented a major prestige purchase in the art world, if a controversial one. Some experts questioned whether the painting was a true Leonardo. Some were simply unimpressed. The painting’s previous owner, Dmitry E. Rybolovlev, is a Russian billionaire who bought a $95 million Florida home from Donald J. Trump nearly a decade ago. Mr. Rybolovlev had paid $127.5 million for the painting in 2013 — less than a third of its sale price last month — and he is still locked in litigation with the dealer who sold it to him over that lofty price, among other transactions.

For Prince Bader, paying such an unprecedented sum for a painting of Christ also risked offending the religious sensibilities of his Muslim countrymen. Muslims teach that Jesus was not the savior but a prophet. And most Muslims — especially the clerics of Saudi Arabia — consider the artistic depiction of any of the prophets to be a form of sacrilege.

Prince Bader comes from a lesser branch of the royal family, the Farhan, who are descended from a brother of an 18th-century Saudi ruler. They do not trace their lineage to the founder of the modern kingdom, King Abdulaziz ibn Saud. But Prince Bader is a contemporary of Prince Mohammed. They attended King Saud University in Riyadh around the same time, if not together. And after King Salman, now 81, took the throne in 2015 and appointed Prince Mohammed to run much of the government, he named Prince Bader to high-profile positions, including one closely linked to the family.

The Salman branch of the royal family has traditionally controlled the Saudi Research and Marketing Group, which publishes the Pan-Arab newspaper Al Sharq Al Awsat and other publications. After nearly 30 years of passing the chairmanship of the group from one Salman to another, King Salman and Prince Mohammed instead put Prince Bader in the post.

In July, King Salman also named Prince Bader governor of a newly formed commission, led by Prince Mohammed, to develop the province of Al Ola, which contains an archaeological site that the crown prince hopes to turn into a tourist destination.

A government statement about the commission noted that the development of the province was important to the crown prince’s plans for the kingdom, known as Saudi Vision 2030, and last week the Saudi news network Al Arabiya reported that Prince Mohammed had posed for selfies there with locals while touring the desert on a four-wheeled buggy.

Prince Bader sat on the board of an energy company that did business in Saudi Arabia, Energy Holdings International, according to its website, and a short biography there describes him as “one of Saudi Arabia’s youngest entrepreneurs.” (It was not immediately clear if the company is still operating.)

According to the biography, he is also “chairman of the founding committee” of a local consortium that won a license from the kingdom to build a fiber-optic network, in a “strategic partnership” with Verizon. It is common for well-connected Saudi princes to profit by providing entry to the kingdom for international companies.

He is also described as one of the founders of a large recycling and waste-management business in Saudi Arabia. As for real estate, which Prince Bader described to Christie’s as the source of his money, the biography says he “has also been active in real estate projects in Saudi Arabia, Dubai and the rest of the Middle East over five years,” including in partnership with “large reputed companies.” The date of the biography could not be determined.

Prince Bader appears to have worked with Prince Mohammed on at least one grand project for his own leisure, as well. Together, the two approached Brent Thompson Architects, a firm based in Los Angeles, to design an elaborate resort complex near Jidda, according to a description of the project on the group’s website.

It consisted of as many as seven palaces for princes in the Salman branch of the family, around an artificial body of water in the shape of a flower. “Petals of this tropical flower formed a series of private coves, each the home of an individual palace, its own private beaches, guesthouse, gardens and water sports facilities,” according to the description on the firm’s website.

When the bidding opened at Christie’s in New York on Nov. 15, Prince Bader participated by telephone and was represented in the room by Alex Rotter, co-chairman of postwar and contemporary art at the auction house. At least three other anonymous bidders were competing by telephone through representatives in the room. Major dealers and collectors from across the art world had gathered to watch.

Bidding opened with a $100 million offer from an unknown collector, setting a floor for the auction. The bids started jumping in increments of $10 million, and almost immediately reached $225 million, far surpassing the previous record for a sale at auction: the $179.4 million paid for Picasso’s “Women of Algiers” at Christie’s in 2015.

The price climbed further, in $5 million steps, reaching $260 million less than two minutes after the auction began. Then, only two anonymous bidders were left, Prince Bader and another person represented in the room by François de Poortere, the head of old master paintings at Christie’s.

The price rose slowly for a while, by increments of as little as $2 million. But after the bidding reached $330 million, Prince Bader began to raise the price by increasingly large amounts. The room erupted in gasps when he offered $350 million. “Looking for another bid, please, Francois, at $350 million,” the auctioneer said, and the crowd laughed at his audacity.

Yet the bidding continued until, about 19 minutes after the auction began, Prince Bader put it away with a $30 million jump, to $400 million. The final $450 million price includes additional fees paid by the buyer.

The prince had told Christie’s that he intended to pay in one lump sum upon completion of the sale. But in light of the unexpectedly high sale price, a contract was drawn up specifying six monthly installments. Five are for $58,385,416.67.

The last installment is due on May 14. It is 2 cents less: $58,385,416.65.

The New York Times









‘Mona Lisa’ in the Louvre











Louvre Abu Dhabi Time-Lapse, 2009 - 2017








 
Last edited:
.
@Bubblegum Crisis

Dear brother, while this is a good investment (better than many other possible investments) my biggest dream would be for us to buy back our invaluable ancient heritage that fills most of the museums in the West.

Saudi Arabia retrieves 52,000 historical artefacts since 2011

ARAB NEWS | Published — Sunday 22 October 2017

JEDDAH: The Saudi Commission for Tourism and National Heritage (SCTH) announced that it has successfully retrieved more than 52,000 artefacts from inside and outside the country as part of the National Project for Digital Recording of Antiquities, which follows international standards for archaeological recording and archiving.
The project aims to document and store all historic sites, artefacts, historical monument and urban heritage buildings in a comprehensive national digital registry linked to a multi-dimensional digital map, which is compatible with modern GIS technologies and digital databases, maps, images and graphics.
Director-General of Archiving and Protecting Antiquities at the SCTH, Naif Al-Qannour, said: “The new digital recording project stores detailed information and reports about 32,000 artefacts retrieved from outside the Kingdom and 20,000 returned by citizens to the SCTH since Prince Sultan bin Salman, president of SCTH, launched the campaign to retrieve national artefacts in 2011.”
“Some artefacts found their way outside Saudi Arabia through foreign travelers who moved them to other countries.” Al-Qannour continued, “One of the most famous artefacts is the Tayma Stone, which was discovered by Charles Huber and later on displayed at the Louvre Museum in Paris.”
He also explained that many employees of foreign companies, especially those who work in the oil industry, visited many parts of Saudi Arabia to study their geology and natural manifestations, collected the artefacts they found and took them to national museums at their home countries.
“Robbers of archaeological sites sometimes dig for archaeological treasures and achieve fast financial gains,” Al-Qannour said, “By doing so, they are destroying important archaeological evidence found in these sites, be it on land or in the sea.”
Al-Qannour stated that the SCTH will continue to work on retrieving and protecting artefacts and has released a red list of artefacts stolen from their sites inside Saudi Arabia and information about them in order to make them easier to identify. The SCTH has also announced handing financial rewards to those who return artefacts or report their loss or theft.
In 2011, Prince Sultan launched a campaign for retrieving national artefacts, including media and cultural programs and initiatives that aim to enlighten and inform citizens about the value of artefacts and the importance of returning them to the SCTH.
Recently, the SCTH released a list of 140 names of citizens who returned artefacts, reported archaeological sites or cooperated with the SCTH in protecting the country’s cultural heritage between 2013 and 2017 in order to honor them during the First Antiquities Forum, which will be launched under the patronage of King Salman, on Nov. 7 at the National Museum in Riyadh.

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1181431/saudi-arabia

See this thread below brother:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/one-...s-discovered-in-ksa-from-space.443566/page-14
 
.
@Bubblegum Crisis

Dear brother, while this is a good investment (better than many other possible investments) my biggest dream would be for us to buy back our invaluable ancient heritage that fills most of the museums in the West.

...

Patience ! Patience brother. Slowly but surely, we'll get there. Their budget deficits - more and more abyssal - will be the flaw.


...
 
. . . . .
What uncultivated ? And what is uncultivated in the first place?

This blatant and shameless waste of money and please dont speak of cuvilization before we know how civilized you people are.

...

^^

Be without fear. No doubt, among the most are dazzling in the history of humanity.




Good Move... That's somthing I back up.
Even if it's overpriced for such painting...

Nothing, nothing is more expensive than a Leonardo - The biggest, unique -.



...
 
Last edited:
.
Western billionaires and Western firms who have been buying up non-Western heritage (100.000's of works and artifacts alone from the Arab world) or taking it (stealing in other words) freely, no comments to see; when Arabs invest in art and try to buy back some of their famous ancient heritage (not in this case of course), people make a problem out of this.

This is (in my worldview) many times better than buying many times more expensive military hardware or that money disappearing never to be seen again.

Anyway each to his own.

This has big potential to become a painting that people from across the world (tourists = money = positive publicity = exposure = more money) will want to visit and see. Same with other art and ancient artifacts. Especially those that are bought/taken back via lawsuits or returned willingly by private Westerners or locals.

^^

Be without fear. No doubt, among the most are dazzling in the history of humanity.





...



Nothing, nothing is more expensive than a Leonardo - The biggest, unique -.




...

The user whose post was deleted was trolling for no reason at all. Strange behavior.
 
.
^^

Be without fear. No doubt, among the most are dazzling in the history of humanity.





...



Nothing, nothing is more expensive than a Leonardo - The biggest, unique -.




...
not this one... Every piece of an Artist are not equal. Per exemple a Mona Lisa is "unsellable" " unpriceable" not because it's a leornado's one but bc it's in itself a Masterpiece, a Life time painting that till this day... his secret is still unknown... Something a Mundi doesn't...

Yes it's a great great piece, a formidable one, but this one, has a price...
The 450Mil$ tag was a little too much... I'm pretty sure, it's because that buyer, rly rly wanted it... that's why the price rocketed...

ps: it's one of the first time that bids were made of 20-50mil$ by rising hands... so ofc... you get to that price tag in just seconds...

in the End it's a good acquisition, but my simple critic is the price tag... that was a little overdue.
 
.
not this one... Every piece of an Artist are not equal. Per exemple a Mona Lisa is "unsellable" " unpriceable" not because it's a leornado's one but bc it's in itself a Masterpiece, a Life time painting that till this day... his secret is still unknown... Something a Mundi doesn't...

Yes it's a great great piece, a formidable one, but this one, has a price...
The 450Mil$ tag was a little too much... I'm pretty sure, it's because that buyer, rly rly wanted it... that's why the price rocketed...

ps: it's one of the first time that bids were made of 20-50mil$ by rising hands... so ofc... you get to that price tag in just seconds...

in the End it's a good acquisition, but my simple critic is the price tag... that was a little overdue.

I agree but a Leonardo Da Vinci painting is a Leonardo Da Vinci painting and the price tag gives it a certain status too not to mention the religious motive that is special in itself IMO. In any case the "hidden" signal behind this buy is a positive thing.
 
.
For the uncultivated. Of course !

Art is also civilization. Without art there is no civilization.
it depends upon history a country has.. you cannot borrow that nor you can purchase....
and that tantrum suits when you have achieved enough milestones in other fields too...
what does artifacts do when tourists seldom visit.. anyway 450 mil for this is a total waste...
 
.
I agree but a Leonardo Da Vinci painting is a Leonardo Da Vinci painting and the price tag gives it a certain status too not to mention the religious motive that is special in itself IMO. In any case the "hidden" signal behind this buy is a positive thing.
I agree.
The irony is that even the buyer himself wasn't prepared for such price tag. But he wanted it at any cost.
I keep thinking that he wasn't alone behind the buy, could be my imagination, but it seems each Louvre wanted a Leonardo center piece...
 
.
not this one... Every piece of an Artist are not equal. Per exemple a Mona Lisa is "unsellable" " unpriceable" not because it's a leornado's one but bc it's in itself a Masterpiece, a Life time painting that till this day... his secret is still unknown... Something a Mundi doesn't...

Yes it's a great great piece, a formidable one, but this one, has a price...
The 450Mil$ tag was a little too much... I'm pretty sure, it's because that buyer, rly rly wanted it... that's why the price rocketed...

ps: it's one of the first time that bids were made of 20-50mil$ by rising hands... so ofc... you get to that price tag in just seconds...

in the End it's a good acquisition, but my simple critic is the price tag... that was a little overdue.

How many paintings of the immense Leonardo exist in the world ?

You see, they have no price. 500 million is not enough yet for his works in reality invaluable.



...
 
Last edited:
.
it depends upon history a country has.. you cannot borrow that nor you can purchase....
and that tantrum suits when you have achieved enough milestones in other fields too...
what does artifacts do when tourists seldom visit.. anyway 450 mil for this is a total waste...

The Arab world is the cradle of civilization. Home to the world's oldest known civilizations and cities. The amount of heritage that originates in the Arab world and which is scattered across the most famous and visited museums in the world can be counted in the millions (literally) as well as back home (within the Arab world).

To give you a little idea, read post 2 in this thread.

It is intended for local museums. Similar to how Qatar bought some of the most expensive paintings not many years ago. At one point you will have so many valuable paintings that those who are interested will come and visit your museums automatically. It's a bit like a football club. Before Qatar bought PSG, PSG was a small club in Europe outside of France. Now they are changing the world of football. Same story with Man City (UAE) or Chelsea (Abrahamovich). Where would the US be without the world's strongest economy? So yes, money has power. The world has evolved around money since time immortal. Do you think that the Pharaohs could built the Pyramids if they had no money/resources?

UAE is one of the most visited countries in the world by tourists. Are you aware of this fact?

Mona Lisa was painted by an Italian painter in Italy. Yet it is associated with France and owned by the French state and displayed in France. When people think about Mona Lisa they think about France and not Italy.

It is your opinion that it is a waste. Many people do not agree and most importantly the buyer did not either.

I agree.
The irony is that even the buyer himself wasn't prepared for such price tag. But he wanted it at any cost.
I keep thinking that he wasn't alone behind the buy, could be my imagination, but it seems each Louvre wanted a Leonardo center piece...

A clever step IMO by any means. I am almost certain that the painting (if ever sold again) will be sold for a more expensive price. This is the trend with such unique artifacts if I can call it that due to age.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom