LOL - Global Fire Power 2015 List is a Joke!

[haman10]

There is no LOL about it .

Iran is 23rd .

indonesia , australia , canada ,taiwan , egypt ,poland , thailand and vietnam can wipe us off the map in an all-out war .

this is the truth , and there is no need to be butt-hurt over it

 

[Azeri440]

India cannot conquer UK and France, while UK and France cannot beat India in its turf.

That's pretty much all I can summarize.

Since the US also cannot beat Russia and China in their own turf, while I still rank the US higher despite of that.

depend what you mean by "beat"

US can invade Russia in its own turf but not China due to massive human power
although , US can bring China to its knees economically with the use of its massive navy and massive air force
without putting any troops on the ground/

There is no LOL about it .

Iran is 23rd .

indonesia , australia , canada ,taiwan , egypt ,poland , thailand and vietnam can wipe us off the map in an all-out war .

this is the truth , and there is no need to be butt-hurt over it

the list isn't just about who has a stronger military
they account the economic power , infrastructure and other non-military related points.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Ya right.

At the end of war .You had just lost one 3rd of your military .So much for imitation
Indian soldiers entered in to Pak soil for attack only after Operation Chenghis khan .Right or wrong?
Intel ops prior to that is not a sybject here.
Lol .You dont need to become Vikings for tall structure.You dont know Kerala or SI .So you dont know new gen Keralites.
Perhaps you have 7 ft or has a height of Piza tower .I dont care.And I didnt ask your family structure.Youjust called me
as little without any knowledge and I said the truth.You can take it or leave it.I just dont care .Thats all.

Are you a parrot or just retarded? stickin to your BS stories which ja been busted several times.

 

[jhungary]

It is not about Indigenous capability, it is about who wins the war.

India has a defense budget of almost $50 billion and growing at the 20% every year, while UK and France are cutting their budgets.

You should also know that it is the man on foot who is going to win you the war and not the machine. That US couldn't win Afghanistan even after 15 years of waging a war against Taliban proves that.

India has half a billion available manpower for military next only to China says it is beyond UK or France reach even to think of waging a war against India.

Even in military hardware, except may be for Japan, in terms of quality of equipment India comes second in Asia. It has some of the most lethal military equipment found any where on earth.

It also about how and where the war was fought. What make UK and France stand out is they can project their power using their oversea asset, where India cannot.

Think about it, if a war between UK, France and India broke out somewhere mid point between India and Europe, who will win such a war?

At this moment, India will no doubt win a war with UK or France if the war fought in or near India, but India will lose a war if the war is fought in or Near europe.

War never fought on the strength on paper, but how far and how many you can support your own armies

 

[SrNair]

Are you a parrot or just retarded? stickin to your BS stories which ja been busted several times.

You again did the same trick that a moron would do.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

You again did the same trick that a moron would do.

I know you did... But no worries .. it's not your fault .. You have the mental capabilities of a 6 year old girl.

 

[SrNair]

It also about how and where the war was fought. What make UK and France stand out is they can project their power using their oversea asset, where India cannot.

Think about it, if a war between UK, France and India broke out somewhere mid point between India and Europe, who will win such a war?

At this moment, India will no doubt win a war with UK or France if the war fought in or near India, but India will lose a war if the war is fought in or Near europe.

War never fought on the strength on paper, but how far and how many you can support your own armies

I agree .But have some doubt about those power projection.
If it doesnt mean for power projection .What is the use of those CBG that is we are developing ?

 

[jhungary]

It is hard for them to project better than China, since China now has a larger number of nuclear sub and soon many more aircraft carriers.

China also possesses the initial global prompt strike capability and many more ICBMs.



That's a bit too overstretched, since you have to know that your gap with China is far bigger than the gap between China and the US.

nobody in this world processed Global Prompt strike capability , not even the US. At best they can do is a strike within 24 hours anywhere in the world.

Unless China have a laser or ion cannon up in the space that i am not aware of, Chinese cannot do a GPS as much as US can..

I agree .But have some doubt about those power projection.
If it doesnt mean for power projection .What is the use of those CBG that is we are developing ?

CBG need underway replenishment...They have to take on provision like ammuition, food, water and supplies.

The key to replenishment and power projection is the land bases. Think about a total war scenario, when UK Or France against India, where everyone else is neutral.

By staying neutral, they do not allow either UK or France or India warship to port and resupply or they will be detained, in this sense, UK and France having more bases oversea will enjoy an absolute advantage toward India who have to sail the same distance with intermitten supply or have no supply base at all.

CBG can be the same but how you can support your CBG is abit different...

 

[SrNair]

I know you did... But no worries .. it's not your fault .. You have the mental capabilities of a 6 year old girl.

Again you are insulting yourselves .
If you dont have anything to refute my points.Then dont quote me.
Indian.military started their offensive only after Operation Chenghis khan.
The circumstances that you were forced to do that ;I mean intel ops is not a subject here.
Our Chief was right .But he didnt say that the we started offensive even before Ops Chenghis khan .Right ?
You created a situation .We used that for our own.purpose through intel yet abstainedfrom brute force.Then you air attacked us so we also did the same favour.

nobody in this world processed Global Prompt strike capability , not even the US. At best they can do is a strike within 24 hours anywhere in the world.

Unless China have a laser or ion cannon up in the space that i am not aware of, Chinese cannot do a GPS as much as US can..



CBG need underway replenishment...They have to take on provision like ammuition, food, water and supplies.

The key to replenishment and power projection is the land bases. Think about a total war scenario, when UK Or France against India, where everyone else is neutral.

By staying neutral, they do not allow either UK or France or India warship to port and resupply or they will be detained, in this sense, UK and France having more bases oversea will enjoy an absolute advantage toward India who have to sail the same distance with intermitten supply or have no supply base at all.

CBG can be the same but how you can support your CBG is abit different...

So our turf will remain from Persian Gulf to Malacca strait .Got it.
Thank you.

 

[jhungary]

Again you are insulting yourselves .
If you dont have anything to refute my points.Then dont quote me.
Indian.military started their offensive only after Operation Chenghis khan.
The circumstances that you were forced to do that ;I mean intel ops is not a subject here.
Our Chief was right .But he didnt say that the we started offensive even before Ops Chenghis khan .Right ?
You created a situation .We used that for our own.purpose through intel yet abstainedfrom brute force.Then you air attacked us so we also did the same favour.




So our turf will remain from Persian Gulf to Malacca strait .Got it.
Thank you.

Not about turf

By joining alliance, you also enjoy a greater network of supplies, this is what China is being smart right now, they are forming themselves an alliance.

Say for example, the NATO alliance allow all member country access each other strategic asset, which would mean all of Europe and North America can be accessed by NATO member, hence their forward projection ability would increase multiple fold. Even to a small country like Malta and greece. Of course you still have to have actual strength for you to project.

India, in my opinion, should expand their alliance to SA to SEA country so Indian own "turf" can expand to Western pacific and SCS. That does not mean India need to invade some other country and build bases but simply an agreement to pull other country to become a non belligent country instead of staying neutral

 

[ito]

Not about turf

By joining alliance, you also enjoy a greater network of supplies, this is what China is being smart right now, they are forming themselves an alliance.

Say for example, the NATO alliance allow all member country access each other strategic asset, which would mean all of Europe and North America can be accessed by NATO member, hence their forward projection ability would increase multiple fold. Even to a small country like Malta and greece. Of course you still have to have actual strength for you to project.

India, in my opinion, should expand their alliance to SA to SEA country so Indian own "turf" can expand to Western pacific and SCS. That does not mean India need to invade some other country and build bases but simply an agreement to pull other country to become a non belligent country instead of staying neutral

Next 20 years will be interesting. India is sure to form some alliances. With money comes influence.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Again you are insulting yourselves .
If you dont have anything to refute my points.Then dont quote me.
Indian.military started their offensive only after Operation Chenghis khan.
The circumstances that you were forced to do that ;I mean intel ops is not a subject here.
Our Chief was right .But he didnt say that the we started offensive even before Ops Chenghis khan .Right ?
You created a situation .We used that for our own.purpose through intel yet abstainedfrom brute force.Then you air attacked us so we also did the same favour.




So our turf will remain from Persian Gulf to Malacca strait .Got it.
Thank you.

Refute your points ? I've quoted your own authors,former COAS,declassified papers? But as usual tha parrot like rants haven't stopped.

 

[SrNair]

Refute your points ? I've quoted your own authors,former COAS,declassified papers? But as usual tha parrot like rants haven't stopped.

Read those posts ,if you can understand then quote me Mr moron.

 

[A1Kaid]

Neither are Russia and China superior to UK and France in technology, industrial knowledge or weaponry.

So for you the top three are

1) US 2) UK 3) France.

You are being naive, if UK and France are number 2 and 3. Even UK and France wouldn't agree with you

The technological gap between UK/France and China/Russia is less than the technological gap between UK/France and India. India has a weak indigenous or domestic military manufacturing base. Vast majority of your latest and most potent weapons systems are of Russian origin. You don't even manufacture a single operating and capable fighter or multi-role combat aircraft.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Read those posts ,if you can understand then quote me Mr moron.

God damn it parrot still sticking to your shitty stories?