'Lipstick Under My Burkha against tenets of Islam': Muslim outfit seeks film ban

[The_Showstopper]

Yea a few seconds. Thank you. Come talk when you guys Charlie Hebdo in ur stride and lets talk. Why go far? Ask the community to support this movie.

LOL comparing Charlie Hebdo with PK? PK more or less speaks out against those who made religion their business, whereas Charlie Hebdo attacked a religious figure. Please do come back when your lot welcomes Wendy Doniger or her book The Hindus: An Alternative History' or when you start celebrating MF Hussain(whom the world respects) but forced to take up residence in a foreign country because of fanatics back home.

 

[Ashesh]

Those who shouted their throats out during UDTA Punjab are no where to be seen.

I hate Censor Board Cheap NehlanI, he's stupid idiot.

 

[SirHatesALot]

this country needs absolute free speech including right to offend anyone's religion.

 

[adil_minhas]

this country needs absolute free speech including right to offend anyone's religion.

I do not agree with you.

It is amply clear that such will never work in our country.

I do not appreciate Hindus taking away my freedom to eat beef. That does not mean I speak ill of their religion or Gods.

Similarly there is absolutely no ground for a Hindu to abuse what I hold dear. Just because there are more Hindus.

We need to see what works for us. Has been working for us. Not ape countries like France etc.

LOL comparing Charlie Hebdo with PK? PK more or less speaks out against those who made religion their business, whereas Charlie Hebdo attacked a religious figure. Please do come back when your lot welcomes Wendy Doniger or her book The Hindus: An Alternative History' or when you start celebrating MF Hussain(whom the world respects) but forced to take up residence in a foreign country because of fanatics back home.

I believe what MF Hussain did crossed the line of artistic license sir.

It was simply not done.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

LOL comparing Charlie Hebdo with PK? PK more or less speaks out against those who made religion their business, whereas Charlie Hebdo attacked a religious figure. Please do come back when your lot welcomes Wendy Doniger or her book The Hindus: An Alternative History' or when you start celebrating MF Hussain(whom the world respects) but forced to take up residence in a foreign country because of fanatics back home.

MF Hussain spent a lot of his days in Chennai and am proud of that. I have no qualms against him. When thousands of sculptures have nudity in them in temples then who is Mr Hussain.? He rendered an apology for those who had been hurt by him. Its real sad he had to die in an foreign country.

Rings Taslima Nasreen. Her friends in secular kolkata even refuse to reply to her e-mails. So much secularism right?

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

I believe what MF Hussain did crossed the line of artistic license sir.

It was simply not done.

I support MF Hussain. What he did was nothing less than Raja Ravi Verma or thousands of Nude sculptures in our temples. We had been an open society. Arab wannabes cant understand it.

Again MFH did apologise to those who feel offended by his paintings and matter should have been buried at that..

 

[The_Showstopper]

MF Hussain spent a lot of his days in Chennai and am proud of that. I have no qualms against him. When thousands of sculptures have nudity in them in temples then who is Mr Hussain.? He rendered an apology for those who had been hurt by him. Its real sad he had to die in an foreign country.

Rings Taslima Nasreen. Her friends in secular kolkata even refuse to reply to her e-mails. So much secularism right?

On one hand, when confronted about MF Hussain, you speak about yourself but not about your so-called tolerant lot who shooed him away from this country even after his apology(Speaks a lot about tolerance)

And when speaking about Taslima Nasreen, you suddenly jump over "Sickulars" and their indifference.

I wasn't seeking your personal opinion but about the tolerant lot.

 

[SirHatesALot]

to the mod that deleted my post what was so offensive in it?

 

[Mamluk]

I support no moderation of any kind on movies/speech but I guess free speech is too much to handle for progressive left.

Then support removing ban on India's Daughter.

 

[SirHatesALot]

Then support removing ban on India's Daughter.

Did you mean the movie? i completely support it

 

[The_Showstopper]

Then support removing ban on India's Daughter.

Not sure why it was banned in the first place, it just showed where we are going wrong but some people don't really like looking themselves in mirror.

 

[adil_minhas]

MF Hussain spent a lot of his days in Chennai and am proud of that. I have no qualms against him. When thousands of sculptures have nudity in them in temples then who is Mr Hussain.? He rendered an apology for those who had been hurt by him. Its real sad he had to die in an foreign country.

Rings Taslima Nasreen. Her friends in secular kolkata even refuse to reply to her e-mails. So much secularism right?

I cannot recall any sculpture of a nude goddess.

Courtesans and devdasis are not goddesses. Cannot equate.

Who are Arab wannabes in context of the discussion?

 

[The Eagle]

to the mod that deleted my post what was so offensive in it?

From the Mod; your post which contains abusive/unethical word used for provocation that the same is in violation of forum rule.

 

[Evil Flare]

here the trailor

 

[Mentee]

Is this accounts to intolerance? Or it applies only to Hindus??

Iam afraid that you've picked a wrong forum to get an answer . Contact your nearest Indian embassy. They might be in a betterposition to tell you the official Indian policy regarding your query . Anyways its amusing to witness another episode of tiny lil insecure indian ego getting hurt by a lipstick