Liberation of Syria

[JeremyVickers]

The situation regarding Christians in Syria has become increasingly precarious, especially following recent military developments. Reports indicate that the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has captured significant territories, including Aleppo and Damascus, raising concerns about the safety and rights of the Christian minority in these areas.

Key Developments:​

1. Capture of Aleppo and Damascus:
   • HTS's recent military offensives have led to the capture of Aleppo and Damascus, which were previously under the control of the Syrian government. This shift has left many Christians fearful for their safety, as HTS has a history of targeting religious minorities.
2. Persecution Concerns:
   • Human rights organizations have warned that Christians in Syria face a "perilous future" under HTS rule. The group has been accused of violent attacks against Christians, including property confiscation and restrictions on religious practices. Reports indicate that many Christians have fled these areas, leaving behind a diminished community trying to maintain their faith.
3. HTS's Ideology and Treatment of Minorities:
   • While HTS has publicly assured Christians that they will be safe under their governance, many remain skeptical due to the group's extremist ideology. Historically, HTS has imposed taxes on non-Muslims (known as jizya) and restricted their rights, leading to fears of further marginalization.
4. Community Resilience:
   • Despite the challenges, some Christian communities in Aleppo continue to practice their faith openly. For instance, worshippers attended mass at local churches shortly after the city fell to HTS, indicating a desire to maintain cultural and religious traditions amid uncertainty.
5. International Attention:
   • The plight of Christians in Syria has garnered attention from international figures and organizations. Calls for protection and support for this minority community have been made amid concerns about their future in a region dominated by Islamist factions.
6. Historical Context:
   • Prior to the Syrian civil war, Christians constituted about 10% of Syria's population. However, ongoing violence and persecution have drastically reduced their numbers, with estimates suggesting that only around 300,000 remain today.

Conclusion:​

The capture of key cities by Islamist groups like HTS poses significant threats to the Christian population in Syria. As these communities navigate an increasingly hostile environment, the international community's response will be crucial in determining their future safety and rights. The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing conflicts likely to affect the stability and security of religious minorities in the region.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866017636976390556

 

[HaiderAfan]

AT SYRIA’S EMBASSY IN SPAIN, THEY RAISED THE NEW
FLAG OF SYRIA INSTEAD OF THE OLD FLAG.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866107592046510124

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

The situation regarding Christians in Syria has become increasingly precarious, especially following recent military developments. Reports indicate that the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has captured significant territories, including Aleppo and Damascus, raising concerns about the safety and rights of the Christian minority in these areas.

Key Developments:​

1. Capture of Aleppo and Damascus:
   • HTS's recent military offensives have led to the capture of Aleppo and Damascus, which were previously under the control of the Syrian government. This shift has left many Christians fearful for their safety, as HTS has a history of targeting religious minorities.
2. Persecution Concerns:
   • Human rights organizations have warned that Christians in Syria face a "perilous future" under HTS rule. The group has been accused of violent attacks against Christians, including property confiscation and restrictions on religious practices. Reports indicate that many Christians have fled these areas, leaving behind a diminished community trying to maintain their faith.
3. HTS's Ideology and Treatment of Minorities:
   • While HTS has publicly assured Christians that they will be safe under their governance, many remain skeptical due to the group's extremist ideology. Historically, HTS has imposed taxes on non-Muslims (known as jizya) and restricted their rights, leading to fears of further marginalization.
4. Community Resilience:
   • Despite the challenges, some Christian communities in Aleppo continue to practice their faith openly. For instance, worshippers attended mass at local churches shortly after the city fell to HTS, indicating a desire to maintain cultural and religious traditions amid uncertainty.
5. International Attention:
   • The plight of Christians in Syria has garnered attention from international figures and organizations. Calls for protection and support for this minority community have been made amid concerns about their future in a region dominated by Islamist factions.
6. Historical Context:
   • Prior to the Syrian civil war, Christians constituted about 10% of Syria's population. However, ongoing violence and persecution have drastically reduced their numbers, with estimates suggesting that only around 300,000 remain today.

Conclusion:​

The capture of key cities by Islamist groups like HTS poses significant threats to the Christian population in Syria. As these communities navigate an increasingly hostile environment, the international community's response will be crucial in determining their future safety and rights. The situation remains dynamic, with ongoing conflicts likely to affect the stability and security of religious minorities in the region.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866017636976390556

The situation is precarious for everybody. They have to go after regime criminals of all religions. Christian or Muslim card should not save them from justice if they have tortured people and have innocent blood on their hands. The biggest criminal though has fled the country.

 

[RClarkTaylor]

Abu Muhammad al-Jolani, the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has reportedly sent a private message to the Islamic Republic of Iran through intermediaries in Qatar. This communication is significant as it suggests a potential shift in alliances and a willingness to explore cooperation based on "shared Islamic principles."

Key Details:​

1. Background of Abu Muhammad al-Jolani:
   • Al-Jolani, born Ahmed Hussein al-Shar'a, has undergone a notable transformation from a jihadist leader associated with al-Qaeda to the head of HTS, which has emerged as a dominant force in northwestern Syria. His leadership has been characterized by efforts to rebrand HTS as a more politically viable entity, distancing it from its extremist roots while maintaining military strength against the Assad regime.
2. Message to Iran:
   • The message conveyed through Qatar indicates that al-Jolani is seeking a form of cooperation with Iran, a country that has historically supported Assad's regime and its allied militias in Syria. This outreach may reflect HTS's desire to stabilize its position in the region amid changing power dynamics following the recent collapse of Assad's government.
3. Shared Islamic Principles:
   • The reference to "shared Islamic principles" suggests that al-Jolani is attempting to find common ground with Iran despite their differing ideological foundations. This could involve discussions on governance, security, or mutual interests in countering other regional threats.
4. Implications for Regional Politics:
   • If this outreach leads to cooperation between HTS and Iran, it could significantly alter the landscape of the Syrian conflict. Such a development might provide HTS with additional legitimacy and resources while complicating the strategies of both Western and regional powers that have opposed Iranian influence in Syria.
5. HTS's Current Position:
   • Under al-Jolani's leadership, HTS has solidified control over much of Idlib province and has engaged in efforts to govern effectively, presenting itself as a legitimate authority in the region. Al-Jolani's recent public statements emphasize his commitment to establishing a governance model that respects diverse communities within Syria.
6. Reactions from Other Factions:
   • The potential for cooperation between HTS and Iran may provoke reactions from other rebel factions and external actors involved in the Syrian conflict. Groups opposed to Iranian influence may view this as a threat, leading to increased tensions among various factions vying for power.
7. Future Prospects:
   • As the situation in Syria continues to evolve, al-Jolani's outreach to Iran could either lead to a new phase of collaboration or exacerbate existing conflicts among various groups. The international community will be closely monitoring these developments for their implications on regional stability and security.

Conclusion:​

Abu Muhammad al-Jolani's message to Iran through Qatar highlights a strategic maneuver that could reshape alliances within the Syrian conflict. By seeking cooperation based on shared Islamic principles, al-Jolani may be positioning HTS for greater influence in a post-Assad Syria while navigating the complexities of regional politics. The outcome of this outreach remains uncertain but is likely to have significant repercussions for both HTS and broader geopolitical dynamics in the region.

 

[RClarkTaylor]

The situation at Saydnaya Prison in Syria has become increasingly urgent as rescuers, including the White Helmets, work tirelessly to uncover hidden cells believed to contain missing prisoners. Following the recent overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad'sregime, reports indicate that thousands of prisoners may still be trapped in underground chambers within the notorious facility, which has long been associated with torture and human rights abuses.

Key Developments:​

1. Rescue Operations:
   • The White Helmets have mobilized specialized teams to search for hidden underground cells at Saydnaya Prison, responding to testimonies from survivors about the existence of these secret chambers. Rescuers have been using sledgehammers, iron bars, and audio sensors to breach walls and locate potential prisoners.
2. Allegations of Hidden Cells:
   • Witnesses and former detainees have reported that Saydnaya Prison contains multiple underground levels with electronic locks and sealed doors. These hidden areas are thought to hold hundreds, if not thousands, of prisoners who may be suffering from inadequate ventilation and harsh conditions.
3. Recent Discoveries:
   • During their operations, rescuers have encountered moments of hope, such as hearing voices behind walls, which has led to moments of pandemonium as they attempt to reach those trapped inside. The urgency of these efforts is underscored by the fear that many detainees may not survive without immediate assistance.
4. Historical Context of Saydnaya Prison:
   • Saydnaya has gained infamy as a site of severe human rights violations under the Assad regime. Reports from international organizations indicate that the prison has been a center for systematic torture and mass executions since the onset of the Syrian civil war in 2011. Amnesty International has described the conditions there as part of a widespread attack on civilians.
5. Emotional Reunions and Ongoing Despair:
   • As some prisoners have been freed, emotional reunions have taken place outside the prison gates. However, many families continue to search desperately for their missing loved ones, fearing they may still be trapped in the labyrinthine structure of the prison.
6. Community Response:
   • The local community has rallied around rescue efforts, with families flocking to Saydnaya in hopes of finding relatives who have been missing for years. The atmosphere is charged with both hope and despair as people sift through debris and search for signs of life.
7. International Attention:
   • The plight of prisoners at Saydnaya Prison has drawn significant international attention, with calls for accountability regarding the abuses committed there. Human rights advocates emphasize the need for thorough investigations into the conditions within the prison and the treatment of detainees.

Conclusion:​

The ongoing rescue operations at Saydnaya Prison highlight both the horrors of Syria's past under Assad's regime and the urgent need to address the fates of countless individuals who remain unaccounted for. As rescuers continue their search for hidden cells, the situation serves as a poignant reminder of the human cost of conflict and the importance of accountability for those responsible for abuses against civilians. The international community watches closely as these developments unfold, hoping for a resolution that brings justice and healing to affected families.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1865884601782329784

 

[HamzaWaseem]

The recent statements from Islamic jihadist groups following their advances in Syria indicate a significant shift in their focus toward Israel, with declarations of intent to conquer Jerusalem and "liberate" Gaza. This rhetoric comes in the context of escalating military activities and territorial gains by these groups amid the ongoing turmoil in Syria.

Key Developments:​

1. Military Advances in Syria:
   • Following the reported collapse of President Bashar al-Assad's regime, various jihadist factions, including Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), have gained ground in Syria. Their recent successes have emboldened them to set their sights on Israel, claiming that their actions are divinely sanctioned.
2. Statements of Intent:
   • Leaders from these groups have publicly declared their commitment to moving towards Israel with the aim of capturing Jerusalem. They frame this mission as part of a broader struggle against perceived oppression and occupation, invoking religious justifications for their actions.
3. Rhetoric of Liberation:
   • The language used by these groups emphasizes a narrative of liberation, portraying themselves as defenders of Islam and the Palestinian cause. They argue that their military operations are not only aimed at territorial control but also at achieving justice for Palestinians, particularly in Gaza.
4. Regional Implications:
   • This shift in focus raises concerns about potential escalations in violence along the Israel-Syria border. Israeli officials have expressed alarm over the growing capabilities and ambitions of these jihadist factions, which could lead to increased military confrontations.
5. Response from Israel:
   • In response to these threats, Israel has ramped up its military readiness along the northern border and has conducted airstrikes targeting positions associated with these groups in Syria. The Israeli military has stated that it will take all necessary measures to protect its sovereignty and prevent any hostile actions from these factions.
6. International Reactions:
   • The international community is closely monitoring these developments, particularly given the potential for renewed conflict in an already volatile region. There are calls for diplomatic efforts to address the underlying issues driving this escalation and to seek stability in both Syria and Israel.
7. Humanitarian Concerns:
   • The ongoing conflict and the rise of extremist groups have exacerbated humanitarian crises in both Syria and Gaza. Civilians continue to bear the brunt of violence, with many displaced and in need of urgent assistance.

Conclusion:​

The declarations from Islamic jihadist groups regarding their intentions to target Israel signal a troubling escalation in regional tensions following recent military successes in Syria. As these factions seek to expand their influence and engage in what they describe as a holy war, the potential for increased violence poses significant risks not only for Israel but for broader regional stability. The situation necessitates vigilant monitoring and proactive measures from both local authorities and the international community to mitigate further conflict and support humanitarian needs.

 

[sidkhan2]

The recent developments in Syria, particularly the rise of Abu Mohammed al-Julani as the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have raised significant geopolitical questions, especially regarding Israel's strategic interests in the region. Al-Julani's refusal to confront the Israeli army, which is reportedly positioned just 19 kilometers from Damascus, suggests a potential tacit agreement between HTS and Israel. This situation indicates that Israel may be seeking to establish a controlled buffer zone within Syria, ostensibly in exchange for supporting HTS in their efforts to dismantle the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

Al-Julani's Leadership and HTS's Position​

Abu Mohammed al-Julani, who has recently distanced himself from his past affiliations with extremist groups, has positioned HTS as a dominant force in Syria following their recent military successes. His leadership has been marked by a shift towards a more pragmatic approach, aiming to present HTS as a legitimate governing authority rather than merely a militant faction. In his recent victory speech delivered at the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, al-Julani proclaimed that the Syrian people are the rightful owners of their land and emphasized the need for unity among Syrians to build a new country post-Assad.

The Implications of Israeli Non-Engagement​

Al-Julani’s decision not to confront Israeli forces could be interpreted as a strategic choice that aligns with broader regional dynamics. By refraining from engaging with Israel, HTS may be signaling an understanding or agreement that allows them to operate with less interference from Israeli military actions. This non-confrontational stance could facilitate Israel's objectives of maintaining a buffer zone against Iranian influence and other hostile forces in Syria.

Potential Deal Between Israel and HTS​

The idea that there is an implicit deal between Israel and HTS is supported by several factors:

• Shared Interests: Both parties appear to have overlapping interests in weakening Assad's regime. For Israel, a weakened Assad means reduced Iranian influence near its borders. For HTS, removing Assad is essential for establishing its authority and governance over Syria.
• Buffer Zone Creation: Should Israel successfully negotiate with HTS, it could lead to the establishment of a controlled area that acts as a buffer against Iranian militias and other groups hostile to Israeli interests. This arrangement would allow Israel to exert influence over northern Syria while supporting HTS’s military objectives.
• Regional Stability: By supporting HTS indirectly, Israel could contribute to a more stable environment in southern Syria, which aligns with its long-term security strategy.

Regional Reactions​

The dynamics between Israel and HTS have not gone unnoticed by regional powers. Countries like Iran and Russia may view this potential collaboration with concern, as it could undermine their interests in maintaining Assad's regime. The reactions from these nations could influence future developments in Syria, particularly if they perceive that their foothold is being threatened by an emerging alliance between Israel and Syrian opposition forces.

Conclusion​

The developments surrounding al-Julani’s leadership of HTS and his refusal to confront Israeli forces suggest a complex interplay of alliances and strategic calculations in Syria. The possibility of an agreement between Israel and HTS reflects shifting dynamics in the region, where traditional adversaries may find common ground against a shared threat—namely, the Assad regime and Iranian influence.As the situation evolves, it will be crucial to monitor how these relationships develop and what implications they hold for broader regional stability and security. The ongoing conflict in Syria continues to be shaped by these intricate alliances, making it one of the most volatile theaters in contemporary geopolitics.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Political prisoners, torture, and extreme political persecution exist across the middle east, including in Israel. You have to reject and distance yourselves from their inhuman and barbaric values or you will have no credibility left, like Biden. Middle Easterners have not learnt anything despite Prophets of God trying to correct them since very ancient times going into prehistory. The best action by non-Arab Muslim states is to disband from the Saudi led OIC. You can form better union(s) without Arabs, including with non-Muslim states.

 

[JeremyVickers]

The UK has announced an additional £11 million in humanitarian aid for Syria, a move that comes in the wake of recent upheavals following the collapse of the Assad regime. This funding aims to support approximately 370,000 peoplewho have been displaced by the ongoing conflict and instability in the region.

Key Details of the Aid Announcement​

• Context of the Aid: The announcement was made by Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a visit to Saudi Arabia, where he emphasized the UK's commitment to playing a more active role in stabilizing the Middle East. The aid is intended to address urgent humanitarian needs as Syria transitions away from decades of dictatorship.
• Humanitarian Focus: The funding will assist various humanitarian organizations and the United Nations in providing essential services and support to vulnerable populations affected by the conflict. Starmer highlighted that "what happens in the Middle East matters at home," underscoring the inter connectedness of regional stability and domestic security.
• Broader UK Involvement: This aid package is part of a larger strategy by the UK government to strengthen its defense partnerships in the region, particularly with Saudi Arabia, while addressing humanitarian crises stemming from the Syrian conflict.

Implications​

The UK's decision to provide additional aid reflects a recognition of the changing dynamics in Syria following Assad's regime's recent collapse. It also signals a potential shift in international engagement with various factions within Syria, including those previously deemed as terrorist organizations, such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which controls significant portions of northwestern Syria.

Conclusion​

The £11 million aid package represents a critical step in addressing the humanitarian crisis in Syria and supporting displaced populations as they navigate an uncertain future. As international actors respond to these developments, it will be essential to monitor how this aid influences both humanitarian conditions on the ground and broader geopolitical dynamics in the region.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Following the recent collapse of Bashar al-Assad's government, Israel has launched an extensive military operation in Syria, characterized by a significant increase in airstrikes and the deployment of ground troops. The Israeli military has conducted approximately 480 airstrikes over a short period, targeting military installations and assets across the country. This surge in military activity is framed by Israeli officials as a necessary measure to establish temporary buffer zonesagainst what they describe as hostile forces.

Key Developments​

• Military Operations: The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have focused on dismantling critical military infrastructure, including air defense systems, weapons depots, and naval facilities. Reports indicate that these operations have resulted in substantial destruction of Syrian military capabilities, with strikes occurring in key locations such as Latakia and Damascus.
• Strategic Intentions: While Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describe these actions as temporary and aimed at ensuring security, analysts express concerns that Israel's intentions may extend beyond mere defense. There are fears that Israel could be seeking to annex territory or permanently alter the geopolitical landscape in the region, particularly around the Golan Heights, which Israel has occupied since 1967.
• International Reactions: The Arab League and various regional actors have condemned Israel's actions as an exploitation of Syria's internal chaos for territorial gain. Critics argue that such maneuvers violate international law and threaten to exacerbate instability in an already volatile region.
• Historical Context: Israel's military engagement in Syria is not new; however, the current scale and intensity of operations mark a significant escalation following the swift downfall of Assad’s regime. The IDF has justified its operations by citing concerns over the potential transfer of advanced weapons to extremist groups.

Conclusion​

The situation remains fluid as Israel continues its military operations in Syria under the guise of establishing security measures. The potential for territorial annexation raises serious questions about future stability in the region and the implications for international relations. As events unfold, it will be crucial to monitor both the humanitarian impact on the Syrian population and the broader geopolitical ramifications of Israel's actions.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866497723794370608

 

[sidkhan2]

Rebels in Syria have successfully seized Hezbollah's alcohol warehouses. This development marks a significant shift in the ongoing conflict dynamics within the region.

Key Details​

• Seizure of Warehouses: The rebels reportedly took control of the alcohol storage facilities linked to Hezbollah, which has been a prominent player in the Syrian civil war, supporting the Assad regime. This action is part of a broader pattern of territorial gains by rebel forces against Hezbollah's influence.
• Context of the Conflict: The seizure highlights the ongoing struggle for power among various factions in Syria, particularly as Hezbollah faces increasing challenges from both local and foreign adversaries. The group has been involved in numerous battles to maintain its foothold in the region, but recent setbacks suggest a changing landscape.
• Reactions and Implications: Hezbollah has described these developments as part of a "major, dangerous and new transformation" in Syria, indicating heightened concerns about its operational capabilities and territorial control. The loss of these warehouses could impact Hezbollah's logistical operations and funding sources.

Broader Impact​

This incident reflects the shifting alliances and power dynamics within Syria, where various groups vie for control amidst a backdrop of ongoing violence and instability. The implications of such actions extend beyond immediate territorial gains, potentially affecting regional security and the balance of power among militant groups.As the situation evolves, further developments are anticipated, particularly regarding how Hezbollah will respond to this loss and what it means for their operations moving forward.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866209431068839957

 

[Akbar26]

Uyghur rebels in Syria have reportedly seized BM-21 Gradlong-range missiles that were left behind by Bashar al-Assad’s regime. In a bold move, these rebels have issued a direct warning to the Chinese government, declaring their intent to use these weapons against it. This development underscores the complex and volatile nature of the Syrian conflict and its implications for international relations, particularly concerning China.

Key Details​

• Seizure of Missiles: The Uyghur fighters, who are part of the broader opposition against the Assad regime, have showcased their acquisition of these missiles in a video. This act not only demonstrates their military capabilities but also serves as a statement against China's policies towards Uyghurs in Xinjiang.
• Threat to China: The declaration by the Uyghur rebels poses a significant challenge to Beijing, which has been increasingly concerned about the presence of Uyghur fighters in Syria. China views these fighters as a potential security threat, fearing that they could return to China and engage in terrorism or separatist activities.
• Context of the Conflict: The presence of Uyghur militants in Syria has been a longstanding concern for China. The Chinese government has accused these individuals of plotting violence and unrest, leading to a harsh crackdown on Uyghurs in Xinjiang. The situation in Syria adds another layer of complexity to China's security concerns, as it navigates its foreign policy while dealing with domestic issues related to ethnic minorities.

Broader Implications​

1. Geopolitical Tensions: The threat from Uyghur rebels could exacerbate tensions between China and other countries involved in the Syrian conflict. As China continues to support the Assad regime, it may find itself entangled in a broader conflict involving non-state actors like the Uyghur rebels.
2. Impact on Chinese Policy: This situation may prompt China to reassess its approach towards Syria and its involvement in Middle Eastern geopolitics. Increased military support for Assad or enhanced counter-terrorism efforts could be potential responses.
3. International Reactions: The international community will likely be watching closely as this situation develops. Western nations may view the actions of the Uyghur rebels as part of a larger narrative regarding human rights abuses in Xinjiang and could influence diplomatic relations with China.

Conclusion​

The seizure of BM-21 Grad missiles by Uyghur rebels in Syria represents a significant escalation in both their capabilities and their willingness to confront China directly. As these dynamics unfold, they will have implications not only for regional stability but also for China's domestic security policies and its broader geopolitical strategy. The intersection of local conflicts with international relations underscores the complexity of modern warfare and diplomacy.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866533022251602282

 

[HaiderAfan]

In a dramatic act of defiance, Syrian rebels have set fire to the tomb of Hafez al-Assad, the former president of Syria and father of ousted leader Bashar al-Assad. This incident occurred in Qardaha, Hafez's hometown, amid significant political upheaval following the recent collapse of the Assad regime.

Key Details​

1. Location and Event: The mausoleum, located in the coastal region of Latakia, was engulfed in flames as armed rebels celebrated around it. Videos from the scene show fighters chanting and waving flags while the tomb burned, marking a symbolic rejection of the Assad family's decades-long rule over Syria.
2. Background Context: Hafez al-Assad ruled Syria from 1971 until his death in 2000, establishing a legacy of authoritarian governance characterized by brutal crackdowns on dissent. His son, Bashar al-Assad, succeeded him and faced widespread protests that escalated into a civil war beginning in 2011.
3. Rebel Group Involvement: The attack was led by the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which has gained significant ground in recent months and played a crucial role in dismantling the Assad regime's control. HTS has vowed to seek justice against those involved in human rights abuses during the Assad era.
4. Political Ramifications: The destruction of Hafez al-Assad's tomb reflects a broader sentiment among many Syrians who have suffered under his family's oppressive rule. With Bashar al-Assad reportedly having fled to Russia for asylum, questions remain about the future governance of Syria and the potential for reconciliation among various factions.
5. International Reactions: The incident has drawn attention from international observers, with calls for a stable transition that respects minority rights and prevents further violence. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasized the need for any new government in Syria to uphold commitments to human rights and inclusivity.
6. Future Challenges: As the rebel factions consolidate power, they face immense challenges in rebuilding a war-torn country that has seen over half a million deaths and millions displaced. The new leadership must navigate complex sectarian dynamics while addressing pressing humanitarian needs.

Conclusion​

The burning of Hafez al-Assad's tomb is not just an act of vandalism but a powerful statement against decades of repression by the Assad family. As Syria enters a new chapter following the ousting of Bashar al-Assad, the path ahead will require careful navigation to foster stability and healing in a nation deeply scarred by conflict. The actions taken by rebel groups like HTS will be closely monitored by both domestic and international stakeholders as they seek to establish a new order in post-Assad Syria.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866957379717497008

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Down with statue tyrants.

 

[RClarkTaylor]

In a significant turn of events in Syria, former officers and soldiers from the Syrian Arab Army's (SAA) 25th Special Mission Forces Division, commonly known as the Tiger Forces, have regrouped in mountainous areas near the Lebanese border. They have vowed to continue fighting against what they perceive as a betrayal by the SAA high command following the recent collapse of the Assad regime.

Key Developments​

1. Continued Resistance: The former soldiers, disillusioned by the actions of the SAA leadership, have declared their intention to resist the incoming government led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and the Syrian National Army (SNA). They view themselves as defenders of Syria, stating that their fight will persist despite the regime's downfall.
2. Commitment to Sacrifice: In a recent video statement, their commander expressed a readiness to sacrifice themselves for their cause, even mentioning the presence of suicide bombers among their ranks. He emphasized a personal commitment to avoid capture, indicating a willingness to take drastic measures if necessary.
3. Shift in Ideology: Notably, the fighters have altered their rallying cry from "Our souls, our blood, we sacrifice for Bashar" to "Our souls, our blood, we sacrifice for Syria." This change reflects a broader ideological shift away from loyalty to Assad towards a more nationalistic sentiment focused on Syria as a whole.
4. Background Context: The backdrop of this resistance is the recent rapid advance of rebel factions into Damascus and other key regions, culminating in the ousting of President Bashar al-Assad. The rebels' swift takeover has caught many by surprise and has led to significant shifts in power dynamics within Syria.
5. Potential for Conflict: As these former SAA members prepare to engage in resistance against HTS and SNA forces, there are concerns about escalating violence and further fragmentation of Syria's already complex conflict landscape. The presence of multiple armed groups with differing agendas complicates any potential path towards stability.

Conclusion​

The determination of former Tiger Forces soldiers to continue fighting highlights ongoing tensions and divisions within Syria following the recent upheaval. As they regroup and redefine their objectives, their actions could significantly impact the evolving conflict landscape in the region. The shift in allegiance from supporting Assad to prioritizing a broader Syrian identity underscores the complexities of loyalty and resistance in a country that has endured years of civil strife. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for both local governance and international responses to the ongoing crisis.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1866927900886467014