What's new

Liaoning: New carrier needs time to be ready

If a carrier is so easy be attacked, why US build so many? Your troop have never seen a carrier in the VN war. If we can, build a 1M ton carrier.

you said 200k ton carrier. I talked about it. Now you said 1M ton.
I say it's easy target for even Vietnam
 
.
Typical Indian loser mindset. This is the type of mentality that make India a sick country and backward. Always fear of failure and question your ability to overcome obstacle. May I remind that that our determination had NEVER FAIL us.
why were you attacking on nationality ? may be because of ccp education. . your brain hanged or infected ...
 
.
Ranting doesn't going to help your country to run Carriers properly.only accepting the facts can.and FYI,we're(a Sick and Backward Country compared to China) operating carriers for over 50 years now(operated 3 Carriers already).In Fact,India is possibly only country who has used both Ski Jump as well as Catapult(don't know if USN used Ski Jump).but yet,when it comes to carrier Warfare,nobody challenges the superiority of USN.

and about Chinese Determination,we're yet to see a proof of it.lets back to the topic than useless ranting.First,put a real carrier with capable aircraft in Sea,then we'll talk.

Indian poster always talk so much about their Experience operating aircraft carriers...yet they ended with the helicopter carrier where the main infrastructure is near the center, no blast shield, lifts in the center. one lift not big enough for their MIG29, take off and landing overlaps so cannot launch and land at the same time, no air defense, and such a outdated bridge.

I feel so sorry for them.
 
.
Ranting doesn't going to help your country to run Carriers properly.only accepting the facts can.and FYI,we're(a Sick and Backward Country compared to China) operating carriers for over 50 years now(operated 3 Carriers already).In Fact,India is possibly only country who has used both Ski Jump as well as Catapult(don't know if USN used Ski Jump).but yet,when it comes to carrier Warfare,nobody challenges the superiority of USN.

and about Chinese Determination,we're yet to see a proof of it.lets back to the topic than useless ranting.First,put a real carrier with capable aircraft in Sea,then we'll talk.
You operate a carrier? LOL What a joke!

The world still laugh at your humiliated lost when China huge forces were kick out the conflict zone in Paracel just by small VN forces after 2 months.

Your army may look good now, but still fight suck and coward as usual:pop:
Grow some ball first and attack us when we put the rig in where you claim to be your territory. LOL
 
.
You operate a carrier? LOL What a joke!


Grow some ball first and attack us when we put the rig in where you claim to be your territory. LOL

Instead of that Vietnam placed their oil rigs to Vietnam EEZ.
You don't know ?
 
.
Instead of that Vietnam placed their oil rigs to Vietnam EEZ.
You don't know ?
Your country lack ball but indeed talk big in PDK. Grow ball first before you talk of toughness against us. LOL
 
.
Your country lack ball but indeed talk big in PDK. Grow ball first before you talk of toughness against us. LOL

Actually Vietnam placed hundreds of oil rig to harvest oil and gas in our EEZ.
China dare not to place a single one to that
 
.
Actually Vietnam placed hundreds of oil rig to harvest oil and gas in our EEZ.
China dare not to place a single one to that
Everyone in here know you lack ball man. This is why I am tiring of you little Vietnamese yapping around. LOL In fact, you and the Indian are the two biggest mouth but lack real ball to do anything.
 
.
Indian poster always talk so much about their Experience operating aircraft carriers...yet they ended with the helicopter carrier where the main infrastructure is near the center, no blast shield, lifts in the center. one lift not big enough for their MIG29, take off and landing overlaps so cannot launch and land at the same time, no air defense, and such a outdated bridge.

I feel so sorry for them.

wow..you know so much about Indian Carrier.I envy you.

You operate a carrier? LOL What a joke!

Wrong.we operate 2 Carriers.
 
.
Wrong.we operate 2 Carriers.
This is why most people laugh at you Indian. Even Thailand operates a carrier, would you call them a proficient carrier operator? LOL

You see, my friend. We have a different standard than you Indian. When we speak of carrier, we intend to build a formation that included destroyer, nuclear sub, carrier aircraft, AEW&C, and among other system which we want to achieve. There is only two or three countries that actually have proficient carrier experience, Britain and USA because they actually have a game plan, a formation for their carrier instead of calling themselves carrier operator simply by having a puny carrier like you Indian. LOL
 
.
This is why most people laugh at you Indian. Even Thailand operates a carrier, would you call them a proficient carrier operator? LOL

You see, my friend. We have a different standard than you Indian. When we speak of carrier, we intend to build a formation that included destroyer, nuclear sub, carrier aircraft, AEW&C, and among other system which we want to achieve. There is only two or three countries that actually have proficient carrier experience, Britain and USA because they actually have a game plan, a formation for their carrier instead of calling themselves carrier operator simply by having a puny carrier like you Indian. LOL

You two are same same.
Don't downgrade each other.

India also build a formation. And mention that it's been working.
 
. .
Indian poster always talk so much about their Experience operating aircraft carriers...yet they ended with the helicopter carrier where the main infrastructure is near the center, no blast shield, lifts in the center. one lift not big enough for their MIG29, take off and landing overlaps so cannot launch and land at the same time, no air defense, and such a outdated bridge.

I feel so sorry for them.

Only if you had the brain you would have understood that the cr@p you posted had nothing to do with Indian carrier operations .

wow..you know so much about Indian Carrier.I envy you.

Wrong.we operate 2 Carriers.

Bro you are wasting your time .

The one thing that I like about the chinese is most of the time they advice others about talk less , work more . But the funny thing is they only preach it to others but never in practice .

As far as I have seen Chinese are the biggest braggers on this forum .

Last time I checked Chinese were bragging how they already mastered the entire Carrier operations with Lioning .

Now with this news their mouth have been shut . But you can bet how the chinese will be talking about how their carrier operations are awesome and others who operated carriers decades ahead of them know nothing about it .
 
.
This is why most people laugh at you Indian. Even Thailand operates a carrier, would you call them a proficient carrier operator? LOL

You see, my friend. We have a different standard than you Indian. When we speak of carrier, we intend to build a formation that included destroyer, nuclear sub, carrier aircraft, AEW&C, and among other system which we want to achieve. There is only two or three countries that actually have proficient carrier experience, Britain and USA because they actually have a game plan, a formation for their carrier instead of calling themselves carrier operator simply by having a puny carrier like you Indian. LOL

atleast learn how to operate that first,before RANTING.

all of those you wants to achieve,will take considerable amount of time,and to operate a CBG,it'd take more.if you can't accept that fact,then you're nothing more than an ostrich which buried its head in sand.and again,please make it before poking others.in the arena of Carriers,even Thailand is more experienced than China. :sarcastic::sarcastic:

about Indian CBG,by the time you'd operate a single Carrier,India would operate 2 and will be vurge or inducting another.and about GAME PLAN,our CBG saw action(Battle) 43 years ago.you're yet to to induct a "Proper Carrier",as you know,J-15 can't take off from Liaoning with full payload.thats make it a "Takeoff and Landing Practice Carrier",good for practice and show off,but no other implications.

now,BUZZ OFF..
 
.
This ship Liaoning is just the price must be paid for us learning that carriers are useless.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom