What's new

LHC orders handing over of Misbah Irum to mother

Lahori paa jee

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
752
Reaction score
0
Lahore High Court (LHC) ruled on Wednesday that Misbah Irum must return to her mother, upholding an appeal by her mother.

" Misbah Irum will be given in the custody of a female officer of the British High Commission within seven days to make arrangements for her onward travel to Scotland," said Lahore High Court judge Mian Saqib Nisar.

The girl's mother Louise Campbell had filed a petition through a local lawyer after her father Sajjad Ahmed Rana won a case here in September barring the government of Pakistan from repatriating the girl to Britain.

Naheed Mehboob Elahi was the lawyer of Misbah’s mother whereas Dr. Basit was the solicitor of her father.

Source

Handing over terrorists and murderers over to US and UK makes sense. Returning a sentences man to UK on requests of British gov is OK. But handing over a girl who fled that country to be with her father and take up Islam as her religion is total stupidity.
 
Britons term Misbah handover worst human rights violation

The UK nationals have come out in the open to offer their moral support to Misbah -- at the centre of a big controversy since she fled to Pakistan couple of months back -- as they have termed her forced handing over to her mother and stepfather as a worst kind of violation of "human rights" and asked her mother to let her daughter live where she likes.

"By bringing forcibly your daughter back to a home she had fled against her wishes, you are only torturing your daughter and making her enemy for rest of your life," observed many Britons on several newspapers' websites after the controversy deepened following refusal of Misbah to return despite a Pakistani court verdict.

Even many passionate British nationals and commentators in their leading articles and comments have appealed to a determined mother of Misbah not to force her young daughter to return and live without her will.

While, pleading on behalf of the girl, a woman columnist of Times London has made a passionate appeal to her mother to let her daughter live a life which she likes. "Please let your beautiful daughter stay where she feels secure and happy with her father and other members of the family in Pakistan."

Since the announcement of court verdict this week, the UK people have started writing letters to the editors and participating discussion on forums of newspapers on the subject whether Misbah should return or stay where she likes.

How common Britons have felt the pain of Misbah can be judged from the single fact that just in one day, Times website has over 60 comments from the readers on the girls' story.

Barring a few who thought Misbah should return as she would suffer in a suffocating society like Pakistan once she grows up, almost rest of readers have passionately supported the right of Misbah to stay with her father and family in Pakistan.

The reaction has been so sharp that the newspapers are still giving prominent coverage to the issue and many have even pointed out many serious lapses in the proceedings which they point out should have been taken into account before taking this decision.

A reader has observed that one wonders how could Misbah be forced to stay with her stepfather in the UK when she has publicly expressed her serious annoyance over the attitude of him. The reader observes that had she felt secure with her mother, she might have not taken drastic step of secretly flying to a country like Pakistan where a 'strict Islamic code of life' is observed.

However, another reader has raised the issue of violation of human rights.

She observed in her piece that how could one see a girl being forcibly handed over to her mother whom she had left voluntarily. The writer thinks that this is a gross violation of human rights of Misbah and she was being denied the right of her choice to live the life she likes to spend.

Another commentator has said that one fails to understand that why the girl was being forced to return to the UK and lead a life which she dislikes. "Why a particular kind of life style was being imposed on the little girl without her consent," she asks in her scrap.

Many participants of discussion forums have supported the move that Misbah should live in Pakistan and her mother should not push hard to get her back.

They have also advised the mother that she needed to understand by brining her back to her home against her will, she was actually doing injustice to her daughter.

They have argued that even if she gets her daughter back against her wishes, she is set to loose her after couple of years when Misbah would be of mature age to take decision about her own life without intervention of any court or government.

For many Britons the decision of Misbah to fly to Pakistan is shocking as they perceive it a kind of country where women have no basic human rights or they have to follow a strict code of life and spend lives within four walls of a house. These people have also wondered that what was going wrong with the British society that the girl was even ready to accept all strict values and traditions of an eastern society instead of staying in a country where she enjoyed freedom and civil rights.

Source
 
that is the law and it sucks
 
Britons term Misbah handover worst human rights violation

The UK nationals have come out in the open to offer their moral support to Misbah -- at the centre of a big controversy since she fled to Pakistan couple of months back -- as they have termed her forced handing over to her mother and stepfather as a worst kind of violation of "human rights" and asked her mother to let her daughter live where she likes.

"By bringing forcibly your daughter back to a home she had fled against her wishes, you are only torturing your daughter and making her enemy for rest of your life," observed many Britons on several newspapers' websites after the controversy deepened following refusal of Misbah to return despite a Pakistani court verdict.

Even many passionate British nationals and commentators in their leading articles and comments have appealed to a determined mother of Misbah not to force her young daughter to return and live without her will.

While, pleading on behalf of the girl, a woman columnist of Times London has made a passionate appeal to her mother to let her daughter live a life which she likes. "Please let your beautiful daughter stay where she feels secure and happy with her father and other members of the family in Pakistan."

Since the announcement of court verdict this week, the UK people have started writing letters to the editors and participating discussion on forums of newspapers on the subject whether Misbah should return or stay where she likes.

How common Britons have felt the pain of Misbah can be judged from the single fact that just in one day, Times website has over 60 comments from the readers on the girls' story.

Barring a few who thought Misbah should return as she would suffer in a suffocating society like Pakistan once she grows up, almost rest of readers have passionately supported the right of Misbah to stay with her father and family in Pakistan.

The reaction has been so sharp that the newspapers are still giving prominent coverage to the issue and many have even pointed out many serious lapses in the proceedings which they point out should have been taken into account before taking this decision.

A reader has observed that one wonders how could Misbah be forced to stay with her stepfather in the UK when she has publicly expressed her serious annoyance over the attitude of him. The reader observes that had she felt secure with her mother, she might have not taken drastic step of secretly flying to a country like Pakistan where a 'strict Islamic code of life' is observed.

However, another reader has raised the issue of violation of human rights.

She observed in her piece that how could one see a girl being forcibly handed over to her mother whom she had left voluntarily. The writer thinks that this is a gross violation of human rights of Misbah and she was being denied the right of her choice to live the life she likes to spend.

Another commentator has said that one fails to understand that why the girl was being forced to return to the UK and lead a life which she dislikes. "Why a particular kind of life style was being imposed on the little girl without her consent," she asks in her scrap.

Many participants of discussion forums have supported the move that Misbah should live in Pakistan and her mother should not push hard to get her back.

They have also advised the mother that she needed to understand by brining her back to her home against her will, she was actually doing injustice to her daughter.

They have argued that even if she gets her daughter back against her wishes, she is set to loose her after couple of years when Misbah would be of mature age to take decision about her own life without intervention of any court or government.

For many Britons the decision of Misbah to fly to Pakistan is shocking as they perceive it a kind of country where women have no basic human rights or they have to follow a strict code of life and spend lives within four walls of a house. These people have also wondered that what was going wrong with the British society that the girl was even ready to accept all strict values and traditions of an eastern society instead of staying in a country where she enjoyed freedom and civil rights.

Source

Hate to burst this journalist's bubble. But I don't think anyone really cares that much to be honest. This has not been discussed in the media (other than a passing news item) and it is the spy topic that is big news here......
 
SC stays Misbah’s removal from Pakistan

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court on Friday stayed the removal of Misbah Irum Ahmed Rana, also known as Molly Campbell, from Pakistani territory till the final decision of her father’s appeal.

The bench suspended an earlier order of the Lahore High Court (LHC) according to which Misbah was to be handed over to the British High Commission today (Friday) to be given into the custody of her Scottish mother, Louise Ann Fairly.

The three-member bench, comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan and Justice Saiyed Saeed Ashhad, while maintaining status quo in the case adjourned the hearing till the second week of January.

The father of the Scottish-Pakistani girl, Sajjad Ahmed Rana, had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court on Thursday challenging the LHC decision.

The Supreme Court observed that the case entails utmost significance and needs to be heard in detail.

The LHC stay order that prevented the handing over of the girl into her mother’s custody through the Scottish embassy in Pakistan expired on Friday.

The Scottish mother of Misbah has been accused of exerting pressure on her daughter to make her live with a stranger whereas the girl has expressed resentment over such a way of life besides showing eagerness to live a Muslim life with her father in Pakistan.

The counsel for Sajjad Rana, Justice (retd) Malik Abdul Qayyum, argued before the SC bench that it should take into consideration the principles of Muslim Personal Law, Shariat Application Act, Enforcement of Shariat Act, 1991 and Articles 2 and 2-A of the Constitution of Pakistan which state that Islam is the state religion and all steps of the state will be governed by Islamic principles.

He maintained that Misbah’s mother, Louise Ann Fairly, is an unfit lady to have the custody of the young girl who has attained puberty in the eyes of the Shariah. Fairly has admitted to living in stable adulterous relationship with Kenneth Campbell. The Shariah prohibits Misbah to be sent with her adulterous mother and a non-Muslim Mahram (stranger). Custody of a young Muslim girl who has attained puberty could not be handed over to the mother who had not only forsaken Islam but was also living an extra-marital life with a man known as Kenneth Campbell, he contended.

Naheeda Mehboob Illahi, who appeared on behalf of Fairly, submitted that the case should be adjudicated in accordance with the Pak-UK protocol on child transfer.

The bench after hearing the preliminary arguments ordered maintaining status quo in the case and adjourned the hearing for the second week of January 2007.

APP adds: Earlier, Muhammad Qayyum Malik advocate apprised the court regarding emergency of the hearing of the case with request for the issuance of orders. If the orders were not issued by the court regarding the custody of Misbah, she would be taken out of the country by the High Commissioner of the UK, he said.

Replying to a question raised by the bench regarding withdrawal of the Intra-Court Appeal (ICA) from the LHC, the counsel for the petitioner said the case had been withdrawn from the ICA.

Following is the text of the short order:

“After hearing the learned counsels for both the parties in the CMA petition filed by Sajjad Ahmed Rana, the father of Misbah Irum Rana, we direct for status quo.

The minor (Misbah) shall not be removed from the territory of Pakistan. Hearing of the case is adjourned for second week of January 2007.”

The former wife of Sajjad Ahmed Rana filed a petition in the Family Court of Scotland for custody of her children. That court gave custody of Adam Ahmed Rana and her sister Misbah Irum Rana, who were both below 16 years, to their mother.

Sajjad Ahmed Rana, who had divorced his Scottish wife in 2001, managed to remove Misbah, now about twelve-and-a-half years old, on a chartered flight from Scotland with the help of Tehmina Ahmed Rana, the elder sister of Misbah, to another destination and ultimately to Pakistan via Dubai on August 26, 2006, according to documents attached with the petition filed by Louise Ann Fairly in the Lahore High Court.

A single judge bench of the LHC directed Sajjad Ahmed Rana to give the custody of Misbah to her mother and allowed her journey from Pakistan to Scotland for ascertaining whether she wants to live with her mother or father.

The LHC order was challenged before the ICA through a petition by Sajjad Ahmed Rana. During the pendency of the petition before the ICA, Misbah’s father filed a petition in the Supreme Court for prohibiting the removal of Misbah from Pakistan till the final orders of the apex court.

Misbah’s two brothers, Umar Ahmed Rana and Adam Ahmed Rana, who are also in Pakistan nowadays, were also present in the courtroom during the proceedings.

Linkhttp://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=4652

Atlast some justice from the SC.

Sometimes when i think of Pakistan's justice dept it gives me creeps. What will happen when the current chief justice of LHC becomes Chief Justice of Pakistan. He is so corrupt he may even sell SC building
 
I think the reason the judge had ordered the girl to go back to the UK was because a UK court had ordered her not to leave the her hometown, and her father violated this ruling by bringing her to Pakistan.
 
Actually no, the court had the following question to decide, "if she had been in pakistan would she have been given in custody to her mother". Since the answer was yes, the order was to return her.

As for the SC decision it means nothing, they have simply stayed the execution of the decision of the LHC , for the time being pending the appeal result.
 
I am dead sure I read in DAWN that the girl was not allowed to leave the UK by order of a court. What you (sparten) have said is probably true, but that was also the reason given by the Pakistani court for its decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom