What's new

LET is responsible for Hyderbad target, next target begum bazar

Status
Not open for further replies.
thats exactly my point you just clarified that
about the earlier part everybody remembers babri mosque incident, dont try to act smart
Babri mosque. Dude 30 temples destroyed in Pakistan in last 20 years, many were quite old. What about that ? Stop repeating same old stale and few examples.

Surprisingly Media reporting Kishan reddy received a letter behalf of LET... They announced responsibility for blast... next target is Begum Bazar....
Which channel ?
 
.
Without investigation or proper procedure the Indians are at it again. Blaming Pakistan for every violent act in their country. But its not surprising. Ambitions of a great power with a brain of a mouse!

What the news reports are saying is that LeT has accepted responsibility for the blast. Not that Indians are blaming Pakistan.

If LeT sends a written admission to the home minister's office, what else is the media supposed to report? Maybe you can enlighten us, with your superior brains (which is not big enough to prevent a blast or two everyday in your own country).
 
. .
Without investigation or proper procedure the Indians are at it again. Blaming Pakistan for every violent act in their country. But its not surprising. Ambitions of a great power with a brain of a mouse!

Well all we said received a letter behalf of LET claiming the responsibility... is it any govn org in ur country?
 
.
I want the blast to take place. minus the loss of life OFC !! It's time some heads are rolled ! Enough with the inept NIA.

NIA is actually our best long term hope. When PC formed it, his idea was to create a unified national org like FBI. He also appointed one of India's best investigating officers to head it (a guy who is such a legend that an entire franchise of superhit movies called CBI Dairy was created around a charated modeled on him, played by Mammootty himself). Problem is that when it comes to an expanded charter, the state governments are unwilling to give in to NIA. That battle continues and will be the case for a long time till the turf war is completed. But their emphasis on scientific investigation is a good one. Till then, they'll have to stick to their limited investigation mandate.
 
.
Not killed, no fatwa to kill him like Salman Rushdie. And there were many supporters of him in Hindus.

right, you still fail to realise my point, you call yourself a secular state and still a muslim was forced to exile

now about the fatwa part, sulaiman rushdie fatwa if it was applicable would have been killed but he still lives today, and still he vomits about islam and muslims, he is an islam basher and hater where as MF hussain was purely artist, he had no agenda to defame hindu religion, and still he was made to suffer an exile and secular india couldnt guarentee his security and exiled him, if he had stayed in india he would have been killed i can guarentee you that

lots of indians would say he was exiled for his own security, he was unsafe in india
 
.
NIA is actually our best long term hope. When PC formed it, his idea was to create a unified national org like FBI. He also appointed one of India's best investigating officers to head it (a guy who is such a legend that an entire franchise of superhit movies called CBI Dairy was created around a charated modeled on him, played by Mammootty himself). Problem is that when it comes to an expanded charter, the state governments are unwilling to give in to NIA. That battle continues and will be the case for a long time till the turf war is completed. But their emphasis on scientific investigation is a good one. Till then, they'll have to stick to their limited investigation mandate.

A national agency to co-ordinate intelligence from everywhere is a good idea, and should exist. But what was wrong with the NIA was that it had the mandate to arrest people and do policing work, which is the exclusive right of states, not thee center. If those provisions are eliminated, and they stick to intelligence only, it would be a welcome step.
 
.
Babri mosque. Dude 30 temples destroyed in Pakistan in last 20 years, many were quite old. What about that ? Stop repeating same old stale and few examples.

right, those temples were destroyed not by religious nutjobs, unlike babri incident which also btw claimed international recognition
 
.
@darkinsky Why you guys so obsessed with Indian secularism. You are not even perfect Islamic state whereas you claim to form the nation in the name of Islam.

As for fatwa, he did lived in high security and opened up when the fatwa was taken back. MF Hussain was targetted by Hindu extremists and there are such type of people in every country, every.

Still he is considered as legend in India. One thing happens you guys start shouting at Secular India. Should I start pointing out lack of Islamic nature in Pakistan ?

A simple thing, those who kill a single person, kills the humanity. Now, see how many innocents you killed in bomb blasts terrorist attacks in India and all were state sponsored, your leaders.

Again, don't start a debate which you will surely loose. Stick to topic.

Its India- Pakistan proxy war thread, not religious one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
A national agency to co-ordinate intelligence from everywhere is a good idea, and should exist. But what was wrong with the NIA was that it had the mandate to arrest people and do policing work, which is the exclusive right of states, not thee center. If those provisions are eliminated, and they stick to intelligence only, it would be a welcome step.

I don't think another agency to coordinate is gonna be of help in our bloated beurocracy. An agency with more teeth is definitely the need of the hour.
 
.
right, those temples were destroyed not by religious nutjobs, unlike babri incident which also btw claimed international recognition
International recognition because in India all have their right to speak about anything. There are many people in India that stood against this destruction.

As for international recognition, Pakistan has made great strides in religious extremism. First check that.

Again stick to topic.
 
.
Surprisingly Media reporting Kishan reddy received a letter behalf of LET... They announced responsibility for blast... next target is Begum Bazar....
well i cancelled my movie plans and roaming in the city because of claims that more attacks can happen .... morning when i was back from chennai , there was no security at secunderbad station despite recent blasts .
 
.
NIA and NCTC are being given sweeping powers to detain anyone and pick up anyone.
 
.
right, you still fail to realise my point, you call yourself a secular state and still a muslim was forced to exile

now about the fatwa part, sulaiman rushdie fatwa if it was applicable would have been killed but he still lives today, and still he vomits about islam and muslims, he is an islam basher and hater where as MF hussain was purely artist, he had no agenda to defame hindu religion, and still he was made to suffer an exile and secular india couldnt guarentee his security and exiled him, if he had stayed in india he would have been killed i can guarentee you that

lots of indians would say he was exiled for his own security, he was unsafe in india

You mean secular states cant exile muslims, but can only exile only hindus or Christians?

Just answer my question. If somebody did what MF Hussein did WRT Islam's sacred objects, what would be muslims reaction? Can anyone draw naked images of Muhammad and expect to survive in Pakistan?

No, he should not have been exiled, but I say that because India expects much higher standards of religious tolerance than the muslim world, including Pakistan. If he did that to muslims, in a muslim country, then exile would have been the best thing to happen to him. In Pakistan, 14 year olds are given the death penalty for apparent insults to the religion. And in India, we debate whether somebody who painted hindu goddesses naked should be allowed to continue doing that in India. (And I side with the people who affirm that yes, he should have the freedom to do that.) But please don't insult your own intelligence by pretending that your country has anywhere near that level of tolerance for artists or anybody else.

About salman rushdie. Obviously you haven't read his books. In non muslim countries, people make fun of their religions to a much greater extent than salman rushdie ever did. Nobody gets killed for that. Please check out movies by monty python which completely ridicules Christ and Christianity (Life of Brian). The monty python group is regarded as Britain's greatest heroes, and that film is considered one of the best british films ever. Nobody has said anything about killing them.

All over the world, people have evolved into the idea that religions are not above criticism or ridicule. Muslims are the only people who have not realized that yet. You yourself have just proved it, by saying that salman rushdie is an "islam basher" - as if that justifies death threats and fatwas. Christians produce lampoons of Christianity far worse than salman rushdie has ever done about islam, and they do it everyday, whether in comedy shows or youtube. Check out what comedians like George carlin or bill maher have said on stage about Christianity. None of them walk in fear of their lives.

It is only the muslim world where the "spell has not been broken". The medieval idea that anyone making fun of a religion should be killed or persecuted. The rest of the world realized its stupidity long ago, and is all the better for it.
 
.
thats exactly my point you just clarified that

about the earlier part everybody remembers babri mosque incident, dont try to act smart

Which incident are you talking about, the one where it was built by a savage invader by destroying a Hindu place of worship?
It is recorded history that there were numerous Hindu and Buddhist temples or shrines that were desecrated during the medieval ages, even the ancient nalanda library was not spared, and it is natural that Hindus would want them back, at least the most important ones.

Incidentally, if you feel so strongly about protecting places of worship, why does the Pakistani government arm and train the same terrorists who destroyed the Buddhist statutes at bamiyan? And what about all the Hindu temples in Pakistan, I am sure you have made sure they are all protected, right? Right?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom