Zabaniyah
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2011
- Messages
- 14,925
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Leaked report details F-35 'design flaws' - Defence Management
16 January 2012
Problems with the F-35's arrestor gear, fuel dump systems and helmet-mounted display could all have "major consequences" on the production of the fighter, according to a leaked Pentagon report.
The Pentagon's F-35 Concurrency Quick Look Review, produced on 29 November last year, identified 13 problems in the design of the Joint Strike Fighter and called into question the decision to mass produce the fighter before the design had reached "maturity" or the testing programme was complete.
The UK's first two Joint Strike Fighters, the F-35B Short Take Off and Vertical Landing variants have already been produced and are set to be delivered later this year.
A significant problem was found with the F-35C carrier variant, which will make up the remainder of the Royal Navy's £5bn order for the fighter, with the placing of the arrestor hook too close to the aircraft's wheels said to be causing difficulty with landings. Eight simulated landings have reportedly failed as a result of this flaw.
"The program is revising the hook point and hold-down damper design, however, if this change is not successful there is risk for significant airframe structures redesign and/or impacts to overall signature," the report said.
This problem, as well as issues with all variants' helmet mounted display, fuel dump subsystems - which it says could create a fire risk due to the "wetting of external surfaces" - and integrated power package, could have "major consequences", according to the report. A further 'classified issue' was also said to have been found and further problems may still be discovered.
"The F-35 program has discovered and is continuing to discover issues at a rate more typical of early design experience on previous aircraft development programs, which calls into question the assumed design maturity which supported the decision to conduct significant concurrent production," the report said.
As well as the five major issues, the report identified a further eight risks to the program, including three issues which could have "potentially major consequences", including buffeting, fatigue life and test execution.
Five issues where the cost to the programme is moderate but the number of issues poses a "cumulative concurrency risk" were identified as: software, weight management, thermal concerns, the aircraft's autonomic logistics information system and lightning protection.
The report said that to fix issues through the production line could take between six months and two years.
While there were no "fundamental" design risks that would lead to production having to cease, the report said that "the combined impact of these issues results in a lack of confidence in the design stability".
"The QLR team concludes that this lack of confidence, in conjunction with the concurrency driven consequences of the required fixes, supports serious reconsideration of procurement and production planning."