What's new

LCA Tejas Detachment | Sept - Oct 2014

Bhasad Singh Mundi

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
598
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
Source: LCA Tejas Detachment | Sept - Oct 2014 | Facebook

Coming Out of the Blastpen
1891154_729486240479160_3029073982421725954_n.jpg



149345_729486113812506_3303979038767599120_n.jpg



10403535_729486163812501_9041613014081332846_n.jpg


1911914_729486177145833_1670360415086224090_n.jpg


10653347_729486120479172_1799940223667410914_n.jpg


10516783_729486187145832_5371871804440729556_n.jpg



1499514_729486207145830_3782856112752105432_n.jpg

149359_729486217145829_681387161844283549_n.jpg

10353092_729486237145827_137562419172185149_n.jpg


10458370_729486173812500_2448379947525712442_n.jpg
 
Old Wine is worth a drink.
30+ years and the fruit is ready and ripe.
 
Cool, just if the engines were kaveri :(
however, work is still ongoing on kaveri to meet LCA requirement :)

love tejas <3
 
Last edited:
Finally something new, 500lb bombs with the Israeli Griffin LGB kit, sadly no twin launcher, but the space between the fuel tank and the R73 looks pretty limited anyway.
With a drop tank in place on the inner station I don't think a twin launching rack is feasible with such large PGMs. SPICE 250 on the other hand.......
 
With a drop tank in place on the inner station I don't think a twin launching rack is feasible with such large PGMs. SPICE 250 on the other hand.......

There were reports about twin launchers for smaller bombs going to come, PSG even claimed Rafales triple launchers would be used. :rolleyes:
Spice 250 is even smaller than the 500lb LGB in the pic, but then why use twin launchers at the wings instead of using a quadlauncher at the centerline and freeing the mid wingstations for BVR missiles. That's actually the best option LCA can have, using such small 250lb bombs from the centerline instead of remaining in old fashioned heavy LGB configs.
 
There were reports about twin launchers for smaller bombs going to come, PSG even claimed Rafales triple launchers would be used. :rolleyes:
Spice 250 is even smaller than the 500lb LGB in the pic, but then why use twin launchers at the wings instead of using a quadlauncher at the centerline and freeing the mid wingstations for BVR missiles. That's actually the best option LCA can have, using such small 250lb bombs from the centerline instead of remaining in old fashioned heavy LGB configs.

Something along the 8 SDB loadout for the F-16 or the rumoured 16 FT-5 loadout for the J-10. Remember the fictional idea I posted on the other thread, it would be interesting how the effectiveness of the LCA as a platform multiplies in such a conflict with the ability to hit multiple targets in one go.

Also, can they decide on whether they want it dark grey or light grey?? :mad:
 
@Abingdonboy , @sancho : Guys I did just a cursory analysis of the prototype and the LSP-1. The attachment has few differences highlighted. I am a noob in aviation, could anyone explain them ??
 

Attachments

  • Tejas_Compare.jpeg
    1,012.4 KB · Views: 31
Back
Top Bottom