Major Shaitan Singh
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lt.Colonel.jpg)
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 3,550
- Reaction score
- 43
- Country
- Location
LCA Navy Gets Ready For Take-Off, Successfully Completes High Speed Taxi Runs!!
More Coming !!
More Coming !!
![LCA+%2528Navy%2529+Prototype+NP-1.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-8Z7kJ6_TLTQ%2FToHgE_pG6ZI%2FAAAAAAAAAV8%2Fyva_M4cUclg%2Fs400%2FLCA%2B%252528Navy%252529%2BPrototype%2BNP-1.jpg&hash=b828e3b451eae1ee87183b7af0007465)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the problem is that even though only 6 were ordered close to 3 yrs ago , the LCA N has yet to have it take its first flight .
It was ordered when IN wasn't sure will it or when it fly .... So I guess if NP1 make a successful flight and IN likes it order will go up.the problem is that even though only 6 were ordered close to 3 yrs ago , the LCA N has yet to have it take its first flight .
It was ordered when IN wasn't sure will it or when it fly .... So I guess if NP1 make a successful flight and IN likes it order will go up.
BTW we have more Mig29 naval version that our AC can field. So I think navy needs more figters. May be for shore bases, training and replacement for maintainance.
I am not a export so I can be wrong
In development you have to agree with both parts. You can't agree on oneI agree with bold part , but not with red one..
Navy is the only wing who are sure of what they want and what they are getting. Navy has understand that if they want to be best in world they have to add desi products.
Unlike IAF and IA Navy's feet is on ground and thinking beyond our imagination.....
Navy is not interested in LCA MK I or II, They are interested in AMCA. They know if they ask AMCA at end moment it will take time, so They want HAL to learn how to expertise these technologies
1. Landing gear,
2. Takeoff and landing on deck
3. Fuel dumping mechanism (It is very useful under emergency.)
4. Metallurgical challenge for sea operating fighter. and many more
N-LCA is an investment, which will pay higher yeild..
I agree. IAF and Army types are gora skin-lickers. They have ego-issues with accepting home-made stuff. Navy is quite sensible & pragmatic, mature.
Oh my friend...... That's too harsh statement.I agree. IAF and Army types are gora skin-lickers. They have ego-issues with accepting home-made stuff. Navy is quite sensible & pragmatic, mature.
Big money, arrogance and lack of long-term planning has fu*ked budgets of Army, IAF big time. They are more busy drinking their as*es off and licking political boots.
I still remember it was Navy Chief who openly advised DRDO to not fear of reverse-engineering as even USA does it.![]()
N-LCA for which aircraftcarrier?
N-LCA for which aircraftcarrier?
you have already m29K. for AC is two engine M29K much more safer than N LCA.( is NLCA much cheaper than 29K?)
and is the over weight problem already solved?