Water Car Engineer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2010
- Messages
- 13,313
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Latest
Older Manned turret
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even if DRDO develops this FMBT with all the requirements IA quoted, eventually IA will claim this to be outdated and come up with baseless claims to shelve the project and go for a foreign tender
Latest
Older Manned turret
Even if DRDO develops this FMBT with all the requirements IA quoted, eventually IA will claim this to be outdated and come up with baseless claims to shelve the project and go for a foreign tender
In that case, why has the Arjun project still being shelved even after it outperformed T-90s when they were pitted against each other. While pakistanis and chinese claim that MoD has forced the LCA down IAF's throat (Even though both Arjun and LCA are potent weapons systems but IA & IAF rejected them in favor of kickbacks and commissions from foreign vendors), it should've done the same with Arjun.Not under this present government, they won't.
You can't blindly blame them, in-house engineering product have reliability issues,weather it civilian or military.In that case, why has the Arjun project still being shelved even after it outperformed T-90s when they were pitted against each other. While pakistanis and chinese claim that MoD has forced the LCA down IAF's throat (Even though both Arjun and LCA are potent weapons systems but IA & IAF rejected them in favor of kickbacks and commissions from foreign vendors), it should've done the same with Arjun.
It all comes down to how they maintain their weapons systems. Our T-90's have been Russian designed and have been assembled using Russian components but didn't all of them breakdown in the recent tank biathlon!Over ambitious,not going to happen without Russian help. Since they want foreign customer for armata,I doubt they won't help us in unmanned turret tech.
You can't blindly blame them, in-house engineering product have reliability issues,weather it civilian or military.
But not assembled by Russian.It all comes down to how they maintain their weapons systems. Our T-90's have been Russian designed and have been assembled using Russian components but didn't all of them breakdown in the recent tank biathlon!
Yeah everything should be designed and produced by us just like the Arjun which beat the T-90's and tank biathlon incident is not about assembly but more about maintenanceBut not assembled by Russian.
I like that it seems to have kept some inspiration from Arjun.
Latest
I like that it seems to have kept some inspiration from Arjun.
It's not entirely a new design.
We already knew there are manned and unmanned turret versions under consideration.
Some designs of both were leaked.
Question is, will it beat this.
View attachment 444010
Even if DRDO develops this FMBT with all the requirements IA quoted, eventually IA will claim this to be outdated and come up with baseless claims to shelve the project and go for a foreign tender
is there any official report of Arjun outperforming T 90 except media report cum PR Exercise by DRDO bureaucrats ?In that case, why has the Arjun project still being shelved even after it outperformed T-90s when they were pitted against each other. While pakistanis and chinese claim that MoD has forced the LCA down IAF's throat (Even though both Arjun and LCA are potent weapons systems but IA & IAF rejected them in favor of kickbacks and commissions from foreign vendors), it should've done the same with Arjun.
is there any official report of Arjun outperforming T 90 except media report cum PR Exercise by DRDO bureaucrats ?
its audit report done by CAG ! have army ever released any report.
I don't think India is not capable of designing an Unmanned Turret.Over ambitious,not going to happen without Russian help. Since they want foreign customer for armata,I doubt they won't help us in unmanned turret tech.