What's new

Korea threaten to strike Kim Jong Eun's palace if Seoul is attacked

I think we need more clarification of the OP poster about his familiarity with Korea, its people and their current collective state of mind. There are many people of Korean origin or part Korean origin, who grew up in the US and cannot even speak Korean or want to have nothing to do with Korea. So without knowing these details, it is hard to take this viewpoint seriously.

This is what I have heard from a Korean who have lived almost entire life in Korea:

- Shilla the old kingdom that allied with Tang to destroy Baekje and Goguryeo, is the Southeastern part of Korea, near Busan and Kyongju, this is where Park Chung Hee comes from and Lee Myung Bak is also from there, if I am not mistaken, and so is his political party that is currently ruling. Apparently these same people have sided with the Japanese and contributed to the fall of Joseon, which made Korea a colony for Japan for 35 years. This same party also allied with the US after the Korean war and wants to extend and continue US influence. Because they carry over from the Japanese colonial days, who made money in that period, it includes most of the wealthy 1% elite and chaebol owners

- the opposition is late Kim Dae Jung's party, who is from the South western Jeolla do (Kwangju, Mokpo etc.) and this is part of the old Baekje country, also connected with Japaese Yamato aristocracy and royal family. This area rebelled under earlier military rule and are the torch bearer of the people power politics in Korea. Because of the recent FTA fiasco with the US, they have gained popularity. They are the ones that started the Sunshine policy and although it has been ended, they do not want a war or harsh measure with North Korea.

As far as I can tell, most, I would say 90% or more South Koreans do not want a war. It is possible that the current ruling party will loose the next election, the opposition will come to power and they will initiate a new version of the Sunshine policy, perhaps continue the current initiative for a Korean economic community. And this party, which represent majority Korean opinion, do not want to increase or extend US influence in the Korean peninsula, but they do not know how to replace the US influence, as yet. So there is confusion and searching of ways on how to get this done. They know that foreign influence is bad for their future. But they will under no circumstances replace the US with Chinese, by going back under Chinese umbrella again. They have had enough of that in the last 1400 years, after the alliance of Tang and Shilla, which led to the fall of both Goguryeo and Baekje.

Sunshine policy is the only and best way to go.

The problem is that each of the five party has a different strategy towards N Korea. :woot:

US wants a regime change.:devil:
Japan wants to increase tension to keep the North and South separated.:angry:
China just wants peace and stability to focus on its own development :agree:
Russia does not want to get too involve in case N Korea start to ask for money :undecided:
South Korea ??? Keep flip flopping between sunshine policy and sunset policy ! :disagree:
 
. .
Well, that's the difference though!

Have you ever see the rich man fight with the homeless guy? Does the rich man puch can not make homeless guy hurt? Why the rich man always avoid the trouble which is does not NEED to deal with? Between live and dead belive me, rich man puch harder than homeless guy at any cost.

but rich man have less tolerance when those weak punches hit him and also the poor guy have nothing to loose so he will go all out but the rich man have cares about many other things so they will be more hesitant to go all at it.
 
.
but rich man have less tolerance when those weak punches hit him and also the poor guy have nothing to loose so he will go all out but the rich man have cares about many other things so they will be more hesitant to go all at it.

Let me be clear for you what pros and cons OK?

1. Poor people has nothing to loose not afraid to die but still afraid to become hungry/starve to death.

2. Rich people has more thing to gain and less thing to loose, once its become harm ways to rich people, their will do at all cost which are poor/homeless guy can not do.

I hope you catch me at this time.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom