Kim's EMP Threat to US

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

How? E.M.P
North Korea has not one but two satellites that orbit the US mainland. If activated, this EMP (Electromagnetic pulse) could cripple the US 'at any time'

EMP from North Koera could cripple the US Military
https://thehill.com/opinion/nationa...-nuclear-armed-satellite-could-cripple-the-us

EMP from North Koera would wipe-out 90% of population
https://www.businessinsider.com/north-korea-emp-attack-us-danger-2018-4?r=US&IR=T

EMP from North Koera would cause mass-starvation
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruced...ass-u-s-starvation-says-congressional-report/

Video

Note - I do not support a North Korea-US War

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

As the video below shows, the Northern Koreas is crazy place, so I wouldn't put it past him.

 

[PeaceGen]

How? E.M.P
North Korea has not one but two satellites that orbit the US mainland. If activated, this EMP (Electromagnetic pulse) could cripple the US 'at any time'

EMP from North Koera could cripple the US Military
https://thehill.com/opinion/nationa...-nuclear-armed-satellite-could-cripple-the-us

EMP from North Koera would wipe-out 90% of population
https://www.businessinsider.com/north-korea-emp-attack-us-danger-2018-4?r=US&IR=T

EMP from North Koera would cause mass-starvation
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruced...ass-u-s-starvation-says-congressional-report/

Video

Note - I do not support a North Korea-US War

i'm against a NK-US war too.
and i don't think the NKs would use it as a first-strike weapon,
but i don't think the USA should let weapons like that dangle over them, *if* they actually do (i did not read all the articles mentioned, but they are reliable sources in my opinion)...
... because the diplomatic performance of previous administrations is no guarantor for the performance of future ones,
also not in NK, despite having a ruling-family government structure.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

i'm against a NK-US war too.
and i don't think the NKs would use it as a first-strike weapon,
but i don't think the USA should let weapons like that dangle over them, *if* they actually do (i did not read all the articles mentioned, but they are reliable sources in my opinion)...
... because the diplomatic performance of previous administrations is no guarantor for the performance of future ones,
also not in NK, despite having a ruling-family government structure.

Good point, do you know anything about what the deep-down problem in NK is? because there is so many theories you cant tell fact from fiction

 

[Yaseen1]

russia and china are much bigger threat to u.s than nkorea it is not new threat to them

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

russia and china are much bigger threat to u.s than nkorea it is not new threat to them

yes, but NK is on the news everyday - they just say hes the dictator.

 

[Yaseen1]

i think u.s is developing space force and is weaponing space to deal with such threat with capabilities to shoot down such weapons from space

yes, but NK is on the news everyday - they just say hes the dictator.

 

[PeaceGen]

Good point, do you know anything about what the deep-down problem in NK is? because there is so many theories you cant tell fact from fiction

no i don't dare to claim that i know that.

lying, seems to be one of their problems.

assuming we'll be OK with a semi-secretly progressing NK nuclear arsenal build-up,
seems to be another,
but doesn't necessarily have to be one...
the NK leadership knows they are held to the M.A.D. principle of warfare now that they've chosen to not actually dismantle their nuclear arsenal (yet, or ever).

frankly i can tolerate a NK that is nuclear armed.
i don't know if everyone over here feels the same about that, but i guestimate that the majority of westerners can shrug about it too, so long as we have the means to vaporize all of NK in the event of a nuclear first strike by NK against any nation. and we do tend to make sure that we can, i trust that "gigantic" military-industrial complex of ours and our governments and intel agencies to see to that.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

He surely cant simply be just a Dictator?

deleted trailer of the dictator 2002 film

 

[PeaceGen]

He surely cant simply be just a Dictator?

humor like this posted on forums like this, is counter-productive towards getting a more stable peace.
meaning it gets you the f-ing opposite of what you want, only in a semi-secret way most of the time (which makes it an even worse idea to post on forums like this)

like those morons at Hebdo, that moron Theo van Gogh in my own country, such humor is hardly ever not hated by the target audience.

and you can't convince your target audience if they hate (part of) your message, now can you?

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

humor like this posted on forums like this, is counter-productive towards getting a more stable peace.
meaning it gets you the f-ing opposite of what you want, only in a semi-secret way most of the time (which makes it an even worse idea to post on forums like this)

like those morons at Hebdo, that moron Theo van Gogh in my own country, such humor is hardly ever not hated by the target audience.

and you can't convince your target audience if they hate (part of) your message, now can you?

I've seen the whole film together with people of faith, they didn't find it offensive, rather hilarious. It's comedy.

The academic point is to highlight the position of a dictator in the public mind.

 

[gambit]

Threads like this are like p0rnography.

P0rn shows sex but without the underlying issues like emotions, mechanics of sex, and the consequences of sex. The actors involved presents a fantasy and the observers handled themselves to get a temporary reprieve from the ordinariness of their lives.

Since this is a military theme oriented forum, naturally fantasy threads about how the US could be harmed is like p()rn. Those who mentally jerked themselves off in threads like this one are usually without military and political experience. They do not understand -- nor do they care to want to understand -- the underlying issues involved like logistics, training, viability, and the consequences of military actions. They are keyboard warriors in the truest smear of the words.

 

[PeaceGen]

I've seen the whole film together with people of faith, they didn't find it offensive, rather hilarious. It's comedy.

The academic point is to highlight the position of a dictator in the public mind.

'people of faith'.
were they north-korean leadership class too? coz only that would count.

and even IF they were, that's not how i imagine the NK leadership class as a whole to see this particular "humor".
what you see as hilarious, others in the world see as reason to (prepare for) (more) kill(ing).
you might wanna just take that as truth from me based on what happened at Hebdo offices by muslim warriors after years upon years of public warnings.
Same goes for that moron Theo van Gogh who thought he was funny by insulting the Prophet Mohammed with the same bullshit[1] joke over and over again.

[1] bullshit when seen in the true historical relativity to today's world.
back in the dark ages and the periods before then, it was apparently common for rich muslims in muslim lands to marry very young girls from financially poor families.
you just don't go making jokes about that, because it is like throwing gasoline on a fire made of ethnic tensions.

same thing over here, with you posting something you and your friends over in the UK may find hilarious,
but which i very much doubt is appreciated as humor by any NK leadership class member, young or old.
it's more likely seen as hatemongering or worse against their leadership.

and while the NKs are fortunately not into international terrorism, you still might want to avoid increasing international tensions between nuclear armed powers, by shoving what you and your friends find "hilarious" into everyone's face on a forum like this (read by Asians over in Asia, as well as people from all over the rest of the world).

this is not the BBC, this forum.
nor is it a pub in the UK,

get it?

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

Threads like this are like p0rnography.

P0rn shows sex but without the underlying issues like emotions, mechanics of sex, and the consequences of sex. The actors involved presents a fantasy and the observers handled themselves to get a temporary reprieve from the ordinariness of their lives.

Since this is a military theme oriented forum, naturally fantasy threads about how the US could be harmed is like p()rn. Those who mentally jerked themselves off in threads like this one are usually without military and political experience. They do not understand -- nor do they care to want to understand -- the underlying issues involved like logistics, training, viability, and the consequences of military actions. They are keyboard warriors in the truest smear of the words.

The first rule of war is to avoid it. Why because people die. I don't need a lecture about humanity from a killer.

Secondly, dialogue and diplomacy are key. That involves breaking down decades of hostility you have created. Humour is tool to warm people up, start cultural understanding and warm hearts.

'people of faith'.
were they north-korean leadership class too? coz only that would count.

and even IF they were, that's not how i imagine the NK leadership class as a whole to see this particular "humor".
what you see as hilarious, others in the world see as reason to (prepare for) (more) kill(ing).
you might wanna just take that as truth from me based on what happened at Hebdo offices by muslim warriors after years upon years of public warnings.
Same goes for that moron Theo van Gogh who thought he was funny by insulting the Prophet Mohammed with the same bullshit[1] joke over and over again.

[1] bullshit when seen in the true historical relativity to today's world.
back in the dark ages and the periods before then, it was apparently common for rich muslims in muslim lands to marry very young girls from financially poor families.
you just don't go making jokes about that, because it is like throwing gasoline on a fire made of ethnic tensions.

same thing over here, with you posting something you and your friends over in the UK may find hilarious,
but which i very much doubt is appreciated as humor by any NK leadership class member, young or old.
it's more likely seen as hatemongering or worse against their leadership.

and while the NKs are fortunately not into international terrorism, you still might want to avoid increasing international tensions between nuclear armed powers, by shoving what you and your friends find "hilarious".

this is not the BBC, this forum.
nor is it a pub in the UK,

get it?

What are you on about? You have just regurgitated your insecurities.

 

[YeBeWarned]

I hope it's pointy ..