What's new

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Votes in Largest Ever Election, FAFEN report on KPK LB Polls.

khawaja07

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
1,459
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Peshawar, May 31, 2015: An impressive number of voters in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa turned out to elect their local council representatives on Saturday in the largest-ever electoral exercise in the province, says Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN).

Although the campaign period remained peaceful to a large extent, Election Day was marked by administrative mismanagement, extremely slow processing of voters, procedural irregularities and several reports of violence and bar on women voters.

Polling was held in 3,339 neighborhood and village councils of 978 wards in 24 districts of the province, with the exception of Kohistan where the elections were stayed by the Peshawar High Court.

As many as 39,079 candidates contested for 23,111 general seats in neighborhood and village councils, 7,681 candidates for 6,678 seats reserved for women, 15,700 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for peasants and workers, 14,224 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for youth and 349 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for minorities. A total of 5,480 candidates contested the polls in 978 wards for 24 district councils and 5,907 candidates in 978 wards for 70 tehsils councils.

Despite the massive scale and evolving legislation and regulatory framework, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) managed to conduct the polls on the date assigned by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order on March 6, 2015.

In line with its mandate to observe the elections and advocate for electoral reforms for transparent, accountable and responsive elections which can enable voters and candidates to exercise their electoral rights without any inducement and fear, FAFEN conducted an assessment of the pre-election processes in 19 districts and observed the elections in all 24 districts.

Many of the issues observed through the electoral process were due to lack of clarity of the new local government system among stakeholders involved in the conduct of these elections – voters, candidates, election/government officials in addition to the polling staff. Equally critical was the legislative areas with respect to the rights and entitlement of voters and the responding mandate of the ECP to protect them.

FAFEN deployed a total of 987 trained citizens (503 male and 484 female) to observe as many as 3,000 out of 11,221 polling stations. Each observer was required to observe at least three polling stations to ensure optimum outreach and in-depth assessment of the quality of the electoral process. All observers were issued accreditation cards by the District Returning Officers under the instructions given by the ECP.

FAFEN’s initial findings showed that political parties and contesting candidates, particularly for tehsil and district councils, were freely breaching the electoral law that bars all sorts of canvassing within a 200 meters radius around polling stations. Campaigning of candidates went on freely at party camps set up close to the polling stations, with no action reported from anywhere to curb these activities.

Nearly 13% of the polling stations were reported to have opened after the official voting time of 8am. District-wise, these delays were reported from 14 out of 24 districts. Most instances of delayed start were reported from Mardan, followed by Peshawar, Lakki Marwat, Swabi, Bannu, Swat and Karak.

The delay in opening was caused by various reasons, such as late arrival of polling officials; logistical arrangements; unavailability of essential election material (voters’ lists, stationary, ballot boxes etc.) and erroneous printing of ballot papers. Polling was also delayed due to overzealous voters and polling agents who interfered with the work of polling officials.

The polling scheme was not finalized to accommodate the increase in voters as well as the complex ballot processing requirements envisaged by the KP Local Government Act. The ECP also did not publish a detailed district-wise polling scheme on its website.

Although three assistant presiding officers were deployed at every polling booth to process six to seven ballot papers, the arrangement remained inadequate as long queues were observed inside and outside most polling stations. Essential material such as counting forms and ballot account forms were observed to be provided at polling stations through the day.

The slow processing of voters, in many cases, prolonged voting beyond polling hours as voters were present inside polling stations after the scheduled closing time of 5pm. There were also reports of voting being continued well after 8pm in some polling stations in Abbottabad and Battagram.

A total of 81 incidents of violence were reported from 19 districts, indicating a highly tense political environment on the Election Day. The incidents included clashes between supporters of contesting candidates, incidents of aerial firing, brawls among supporters of contesting parties and scuffles between voters and polling/security officials. Violence incidents were also reported from female polling stations.


FAFEN observers also reported 19 incidents of polling stations being captured by the supporters of contesting candidates and political parties in nine districts. Around 26% of such incidents were reported from Haripur, followed by 16% each from Peshawar and Bannu.


Although the participation of women voters improved considerably compared to previous polls in the province, obstacles to women’s voting were, nevertheless, prevalent in several areas.

Incidents of barring women from voting were reported from at least one polling station in 80 out of 462 wards. Although women were seen voting at some polling stations in Lower Dir (where they were barred in a recent by-election), incidents of barring women were reported from at least one polling station in 17 wards.

In the other 63 wards, women were disenfranchised in at least one polling station due to systematic or institutional issues, such as absence of female polling staff, presence of male staff at female polling stations, absence of female polling stations/booths or shared entrance for both men and women at combined polling stations.

Despite a relatively-improved accreditation process by the ECP and better coordination between the ECP and the KP government on the issue, FAFEN observers faced obstacles in their work and were stopped from observing the voting and counting process in many areas.

Restrictions on observation were reported from at least one polling station in 34 wards of 11 districts. At least one observer in Peshawar was taken into custody when he tried to persuade the security officials to let him talk to the presiding officer. Another observer was injured during a violence incident in Peshawar.

A local government election system inspiring public confidence is critical to strengthening democracy in Pakistan. The existing legal and administrative frameworks, as proposed/enacted by the provinces for the conduct of local government elections, are inadequate to meet internationally-accepted and constitutionally endorsed standards of electoral freedom, fairness, neutrality and transparency.

Having observed the above-mentioned irregularities and misconduct, FAFEN proposes a federal framework legislation to define the role of the ECP to conduct consistent, free, fair and transparent local government elections.

Source
 
But credit goes to ECP because KPK provincial govt was palsied during electoral process :D
 
Peshawar, May 31, 2015: An impressive number of voters in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa turned out to elect their local council representatives on Saturday in the largest-ever electoral exercise in the province, says Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN).

Although the campaign period remained peaceful to a large extent, Election Day was marked by administrative mismanagement, extremely slow processing of voters, procedural irregularities and several reports of violence and bar on women voters.

Polling was held in 3,339 neighborhood and village councils of 978 wards in 24 districts of the province, with the exception of Kohistan where the elections were stayed by the Peshawar High Court.

As many as 39,079 candidates contested for 23,111 general seats in neighborhood and village councils, 7,681 candidates for 6,678 seats reserved for women, 15,700 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for peasants and workers, 14,224 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for youth and 349 candidates for 3,339 seats reserved for minorities. A total of 5,480 candidates contested the polls in 978 wards for 24 district councils and 5,907 candidates in 978 wards for 70 tehsils councils.

Despite the massive scale and evolving legislation and regulatory framework, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) managed to conduct the polls on the date assigned by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order on March 6, 2015.

In line with its mandate to observe the elections and advocate for electoral reforms for transparent, accountable and responsive elections which can enable voters and candidates to exercise their electoral rights without any inducement and fear, FAFEN conducted an assessment of the pre-election processes in 19 districts and observed the elections in all 24 districts.

Many of the issues observed through the electoral process were due to lack of clarity of the new local government system among stakeholders involved in the conduct of these elections – voters, candidates, election/government officials in addition to the polling staff. Equally critical was the legislative areas with respect to the rights and entitlement of voters and the responding mandate of the ECP to protect them.

FAFEN deployed a total of 987 trained citizens (503 male and 484 female) to observe as many as 3,000 out of 11,221 polling stations. Each observer was required to observe at least three polling stations to ensure optimum outreach and in-depth assessment of the quality of the electoral process. All observers were issued accreditation cards by the District Returning Officers under the instructions given by the ECP.

FAFEN’s initial findings showed that political parties and contesting candidates, particularly for tehsil and district councils, were freely breaching the electoral law that bars all sorts of canvassing within a 200 meters radius around polling stations. Campaigning of candidates went on freely at party camps set up close to the polling stations, with no action reported from anywhere to curb these activities.

Nearly 13% of the polling stations were reported to have opened after the official voting time of 8am. District-wise, these delays were reported from 14 out of 24 districts. Most instances of delayed start were reported from Mardan, followed by Peshawar, Lakki Marwat, Swabi, Bannu, Swat and Karak.

The delay in opening was caused by various reasons, such as late arrival of polling officials; logistical arrangements; unavailability of essential election material (voters’ lists, stationary, ballot boxes etc.) and erroneous printing of ballot papers. Polling was also delayed due to overzealous voters and polling agents who interfered with the work of polling officials.

The polling scheme was not finalized to accommodate the increase in voters as well as the complex ballot processing requirements envisaged by the KP Local Government Act. The ECP also did not publish a detailed district-wise polling scheme on its website.

Although three assistant presiding officers were deployed at every polling booth to process six to seven ballot papers, the arrangement remained inadequate as long queues were observed inside and outside most polling stations. Essential material such as counting forms and ballot account forms were observed to be provided at polling stations through the day.

The slow processing of voters, in many cases, prolonged voting beyond polling hours as voters were present inside polling stations after the scheduled closing time of 5pm. There were also reports of voting being continued well after 8pm in some polling stations in Abbottabad and Battagram.

A total of 81 incidents of violence were reported from 19 districts, indicating a highly tense political environment on the Election Day. The incidents included clashes between supporters of contesting candidates, incidents of aerial firing, brawls among supporters of contesting parties and scuffles between voters and polling/security officials. Violence incidents were also reported from female polling stations.


FAFEN observers also reported 19 incidents of polling stations being captured by the supporters of contesting candidates and political parties in nine districts. Around 26% of such incidents were reported from Haripur, followed by 16% each from Peshawar and Bannu.


Although the participation of women voters improved considerably compared to previous polls in the province, obstacles to women’s voting were, nevertheless, prevalent in several areas.

Incidents of barring women from voting were reported from at least one polling station in 80 out of 462 wards. Although women were seen voting at some polling stations in Lower Dir (where they were barred in a recent by-election), incidents of barring women were reported from at least one polling station in 17 wards.

In the other 63 wards, women were disenfranchised in at least one polling station due to systematic or institutional issues, such as absence of female polling staff, presence of male staff at female polling stations, absence of female polling stations/booths or shared entrance for both men and women at combined polling stations.

Despite a relatively-improved accreditation process by the ECP and better coordination between the ECP and the KP government on the issue, FAFEN observers faced obstacles in their work and were stopped from observing the voting and counting process in many areas.

Restrictions on observation were reported from at least one polling station in 34 wards of 11 districts. At least one observer in Peshawar was taken into custody when he tried to persuade the security officials to let him talk to the presiding officer. Another observer was injured during a violence incident in Peshawar.

A local government election system inspiring public confidence is critical to strengthening democracy in Pakistan. The existing legal and administrative frameworks, as proposed/enacted by the provinces for the conduct of local government elections, are inadequate to meet internationally-accepted and constitutionally endorsed standards of electoral freedom, fairness, neutrality and transparency.

Having observed the above-mentioned irregularities and misconduct, FAFEN proposes a federal framework legislation to define the role of the ECP to conduct consistent, free, fair and transparent local government elections.

Source

The voter turn out was more due to IK factor.
 
But credit goes to ECP because KPK provincial govt was palsied during electoral process :D

I think we all know how IK and KP govt. begged ECP to hold KP LB polls immediatey and A.S.A.P but ECP kept delaying them. Even PTI had to withdraw its demand of biometric votes cause ECP was hell bent on finding different reasons to delay these polls. So in all honestly half the credit goes to PTI for forcing ECP's hand here.
 
I think we all know how IK and KP govt. begged ECP to hold KP LB polls immediatey and A.S.A.P but ECP kept delaying them. Even PTI had to withdraw its demand of biometric votes cause ECP was hell bent on finding different reasons to delay these polls. So in all honestly half the credit goes to PTI for forcing ECP's hand here.


I agree but PTI should take half responsibility of mess up .........
 
I agree but PTI should take half responsibility of mess up .........

Since i don't know the details about the law or constitution regarding this exact thing, i can't really comment. If ecp's rules state that CM KPK and the govt. is solely responsible for the implementation then yes definitely..otherwise nope.
 
I agree but PTI should take half responsibility of mess up .........

From what i understand, the powers of Administration were handed over to the ECP on the polling day.

I must say, ECP is by far one of the most incompetent institutions in Pakistan. Ever after facing such wrath, they still haven't reformed. The Provincial Government proposed to hold the elections on multiple days to avoid such heavy work load on just one day, ECP rejected that. Provincial Government proposed to use biometric system, ECP also rejected that too. God Damn, what are the limits to their incompetence.
 
From what i understand, the powers of Administration were handed over to the ECP on the polling day.

I must say, ECP is by far one of the most incompetent institutions in Pakistan. Ever after facing such wrath, they still haven't reformed. The Provincial Government proposed to hold the elections on multiple days to avoid such heavy work load on just one day, ECP rejected that. Provincial Government proposed to use biometric system, ECP also rejected that too. God Damn, what are the limits to their incompetence.
I know ECP is incompetent ... I know as well PTI has suggested that polls should be hold in multiple days ... But could we give clean chit to provincial govt regarding law n order ... Its administrative issue and ECP is not an administrative body ........
 
I know ECP is incompetent ... I know as well PTI has suggested that polls should be hold in multiple days ... But could we give clean chit to provincial govt regarding law n order ... Its administrative issue and ECP is not an administrative body ........
Actually no administration can conduct election on a single day at this scale. It has to be held in installments like India election commission does. And until this happens the scale of irregularities and law/order situation would get worse. Same thing happens in general elections.
 
so this is new KPK?
16 Killed and over 60 Injured by the bullets of unknown People, and non Political Police not arrested one!
But arrested Mian Iftikhar Hussain, on allegation of Killing PTI Worker.

Shoukat Yousufzai, admitted that all 16 were killed by civilians not Police.
so this is the change PTI claimed!

My Question ! what ever happened in KPK is rigging ??
 
so this is new KPK?
16 Killed and over 60 Injured by the bullets of unknown People, and non Political Police not arrested one!
But arrested Mian Iftikhar Hussain, on allegation of Killing PTI Worker.

Shoukat Yousufzai, admitted that all 16 were killed by civilians not Police.
so this is the change PTI claimed!

My Question ! what ever happened in KPK is rigging ??
Yes sure , you are million % right my dear !
PTI has failed in all of its given political tasks ?
& it was a war to win those elections ?
illegal arms openly used , peoples openly killed by the backing of PTI its CM & its minsters & as a result other patties also followed the whole circle of violence & worst terror on the election day !
 

Back
Top Bottom