What's new

Keeping India out of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations

It is not possible to keep India out of BD when BD is surrounded from all sides by India.

India would always have its influence in BD and there is nothing one can do about it. The best is leave BD for whatever sh!t it is doing and move on. Keep the relations at minimum and move on with the status quo we have today.

Well anyway I don't think you will understand. Pakistanis have been incapable of rational thinking that's why they are where they are now. Anyway. Have fun.

Pakistan is an important regional player who plays a very crucial role in this region while BD map comes free if you buy map of India.
 
.
Hahaha do you even know the difference between nominal and ppp GDP. The link that you are quoting is showing nominal GDP of Dhaka as of 2013 and PPP GDP of Pakistan which makes the source comparing apple with orange.

Both show data from 2015!

Both show average annual GDP of Dhaka and Karachi:

View attachment 458511
sss.png


The projected estimate of GDP of Karachi 113 billion came from PwC which estimated Karachi's GDP to be 193 billion usd by 2025 and at the same time for Dhaka it will be 215 billion USD.


For you more details as reference:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Karachi

A PricewaterhouseCoopers study released in 2009, which surveyed the 2008 GDP of the top cities in the world, calculated Karachi’s GDP (PPP) to be $113 billion as of 2014. projected to be $193 billion in 2025 at a growth rate of 5.5%).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Dhaka

According to Cambridge University's 2014 analysis, the total nominal Gross State Product (GDP) of Dhaka was US$37 billion,[1]

To measure GDP both case source should be same. Look the PWC figures. As of 2008 both Dhaka and Karachi had 78 billion GDP (PPP). It will change to 215 billion usd for Dhaka and 193 billion usd for Karachi by 2025.

Look at page 12:::

http://pwc.blogs.com/files/global-city-gdp-rankings-2008-2025.pdf

Dont bring me predictions... Back in 15, Pak was much worse with a stagnant economy... Today our economy is on the rise.

In 2015... our economic growth was barely 4%... today its touchng 6%... and we are on road to recovery.
 
Last edited:
.
Both show data from 2015!

Both show average annual GDP of Dhaka and Karachi:

View attachment 458511 View attachment 458512



Dont bring me predictions... Back in 15, Pak was much worse with a stagnant economy... Today our economy is on the rise.

In 2015... our economic growth was barely 4%... today its touchng 6%... and we are on road to recovery.


Do you know the difference between nominal and PPP GDP? Karachi figure was quoted with PPP and Dhakas with nominal and that is of the year 2013. You are comparing a nominal with PPP?

Forget about prediction, based on PWC report as of 2008 both Dhaka and Karachi had 78 billion USD (PPP) GDP. But rank of Dhaka was one step ahead of Karachi.

Last year I guess you know Bangladesh has overtaken Pakistan based on nominal per capita GDP. Do you still believe or want to remain in your lala land Karachi has higher GDP then Dhaka?

https://www.tribune.com.pk/story/1512636/east-overtakes-west

Either bring nominal GDP of Karachi or compare it with PPP GDP of Dhaka!!

Hahaha have fun kids!!!
 
.
Actually those men were behind of what made Jinnah of what he became eventually.Remember, before 1946, Muslim league had not much power base outside of Bengal and Uttar Pradesh. But in Uttar Pradesh, muslim league was a party of a minority.Never had any chance to come to power or influence the govt. policy. Only in Bengal, it represented the majority community and was in power. As Bengal was the biggest and most influential province (political+economical), hosting largest number of muslims, so it's ruling Muslim league party got the vital legitimacy to claim the representative of Indian muslim. Upon which Muslim league negotiated with the British and Congress and eventually won Pakistan. Can you imagine, the Punjab province of Pakistan, which currently set the parameter of who are patriotic Pakistani and who are not, elected Congress+Unionist party in to power as late as 1946 election? So what would have happened if Muslim League had not much a support base in Bengal ?
Excellent
 
.
Do you know the difference between nominal and PPP GDP? Karachi figure was quoted with PPP and Dhakas with nominal and that is of the year 2013. You are comparing a nominal with PPP?

Sure... there is a difference... but do you see any mention of PPP or Nominal in the reports I linked?

Or is LLyods biased against BD?

Forget about prediction, based on PWC report as of 2008 both Dhaka and Karachi had 78 billion USD (PPP) GDP. But rank of Dhaka was one step ahead of Karachi.

Last year I guess you know Bangladesh has overtaken Pakistan based on nominal per capita GDP. Do you still believe or want to remain in your lala land Karachi has higher GDP then Dhaka?

https://www.tribune.com.pk/story/1512636/east-overtakes-west

Either bring nominal GDP of Karachi or compare it with PPP GDP of Dhaka!!

Hahaha have fun kids!!!
Listen Uncle, Back in 2008, we had a massive flood, in 2005 we had a massive earthquake...Quarter of our country was effectively in ruins and a big chunk under taliban control... so lets not even go there.

You talk about PPP vs Nominal... here are the reports... which I doubt youve even seen... considering how you were whining about my data showing BD statistics from 2013 and now its PPP vs Nominal drama all over again.

Here find me any mention of a different equation used by LLyods :
ss.png



sssssss.png


Where does it mention difference of PPP vs Dhakas Nominal?? Im all ears!
 
.
Sure... there is a difference... but do you see any mention of PPP or Nominal in the reports I linked?

Or is LLyods biased against BD?


Listen Uncle, Back in 2008, we had a massive flood, in 2005 we had a massive earthquake...Quarter of our country was effectively in ruins and a big chunk under taliban control... so lets not even go there.

You talk about PPP vs Nominal... here are the reports... which I doubt youve even seen... considering how you were whining about my data showing BD statistics from 2013 and now its PPP vs Nominal drama all over again.

Here find me any mention of a different equation used by LLyods :
View attachment 458514


View attachment 458515

Where does it mention difference of PPP vs Dhakas Nominal?? Im all ears!

Tell me where does it say PPP or for Karachi it was nominal. Dhaka's GDP back in 2008 based on ppp was 78 billion USD. Look at the GDP section...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhaka


Regarding the GDP of 34 billion usd based on the Cambridge university report that you are quoting is nominal indicated in the following link:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Dhaka

Bottom line it is not only 2013 is the issue as it is backdated data but also nominal quotation for Dhaka and PPP quotation for Karachi make this comparison unreliable based on the link you quoted kids.

Compare PPP against PPP which PwC does or nominal against nominal which your link doesn't do.

For your info in terms of nominal per capita GDP Bangladesh has overtaken Pakistan.
 
.
Tell me where does it say PPP or for Karachi it was nominal. Dhaka's GDP back in 2008 based on ppp was 78 billion USD. Look at the GDP section...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhaka


Regarding the GDP of 34 billion usd based on the Cambridge university report that you are quoting is nominal indicated in the following link:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Dhaka

Bottom line it is not only 2013 is the issue as it is backdated data but also nominal quotation for Dhaka and PPP quotation for Karachi make this comparison unreliable based on the link you quoted kids.

Compare PPP against PPP which PwC does or nominal against nominal which your link doesn't do.

For your info in terms of nominal per capita GDP Bangladesh has overtaken Pakistan.

In short u got nothing? all your PPP vs Nominal is based on nothin?

And now you are down to wkipeda.
 
.
In short u got nothing? all your PPP vs Nominal is based on nothin?

And now you are down to wkipeda.


Kids that is to show you comparison between PPP and nominal. First link quoted PPP which was 78 billion usd back in 2008 and second one nominal figure from your link.

I guess you at lest has math knowledge when economy of Bangladesh is expanding at a rapid rate GDP of Dhaka is not going to be less then half after 5 years from 2008.

I showed you already Karachi's GDP is not only legging behind Dhaka in 7 years it will 22 billion usd behind based on PwC report.

See page 12:

http://pwc.blogs.com/files/global-city-gdp-rankings-2008-2025.pdf

In nominal term per capita GDP of Bangladesh is $1538 and $1470 for Pakistan.

Hahaha don't tell me now you can't multiply to get answer. Hahahaha

Please don't share the backdated link that you are sharing unless you bring nominal figure for Karachi!!!

Hahahaha. Irony is to teach you some basic maths I wasted 5 minute of my life. Lol
 
. .
The BJP crowd wants to build a India based on Hinduism. If the saffron crowd are terrorists so are the founders are Pakistan. As far as planting the Islamic flag on Red Fort that saga ended with Aurangzeb. Harayana was part of Indian Punjab until 1966.

India is the birthplace of Hinduism. If not India where did it come from ??
It is possible some outsiders adopted Hinduism. I won't argue with that.

Why would Jinnah seriously care about linguistic confederation that does nothing for rights of Muslims ?
Jinnah cared about political power nothing else.

1. Founders of Pakistan never indulged in terror activities whereas rss was pre partition and L k advani accepted that he planned the murder of jinnah ....
2. those soo called muslim dynasties who ruled india were just muslims by name and act but they never imposed their views forecfully on indian population ( otherwise indians wont have non muslim majority in india )... it is mostly western propaganda adopted by their eastern bed fellow to forward their agendas.
3. hinduism is not the birthplace of india at all..
4. He cared about linguistic confederation because he promoted secularism then...and he believed that linguistic based confederation will be secular in nature and power will b shared between two dominant groups
 
.
1. Founders of Pakistan never indulged in terror activities whereas rss was pre partition and L k advani accepted that he planned the murder of jinnah ....
2. those soo called muslim dynasties who ruled india were just muslims by name and act but they never imposed their views forecfully on indian population ( otherwise indians wont have non muslim majority in india )... it is mostly western propaganda adopted by their eastern bed fellow to forward their agendas.
3. hinduism is not the birthplace of india at all..
4. He cared about linguistic confederation because he promoted secularism then...and he believed that linguistic based confederation will be secular in nature and power will b shared between two dominant groups

jinnah did not care about anything. he is a power hungry person who changed his colors to suit his needs.
IMO pakistan's troubles reflect the fact Jinnah had not thought through everything

Which country is the birthplace of Hinduism ??
 
.
jinnah did not care about anything. he is a power hungry person who changed his colors to suit his needs.
IMO pakistan's troubles reflect the fact Jinnah had not thought through everything

Which country is the birthplace of Hinduism ??

just because u hate jinnah doesnt mean that u come up with your own facts ....Jinnah did good and a better job than anyone else...

I dont know mate u should read nehru book to find out its origin because he states in the book that it was spread very violently and replaced budhism in india in no time ...
 
.
just because u hate jinnah doesnt mean that u come up with your own facts ....Jinnah did good and a better job than anyone else...

I dont know mate u should read nehru book to find out its origin because he states in the book that it was spread very violently and replaced budhism in india in no time ...

Hinduism predates Buddhism
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom