What's new

Kayani spells out terms for regional stability

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
By Zahid Hussain
Tuesday, 02 Feb, 2010

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect...-not-want-to-control-afghanistan-kayani-rs-02


RAWALPINDI: Chief of the Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said on Monday the success of military operations in the tribal regions have caused substantial decline in cross-border attacks on Nato forces in Afghanistan and warned that it was essential to address Pakistan’s long-term strategic concerns for stability in the region.

In a rare press briefing, General Kayani said it would be a cause of worry for Pakistan if Afghanistan’s projected army developed the potential to take on Pakistan.

“We want a strategic depth in Afghanistan but do not want to control it,” the general said while talking to a group of journalists at the Army General Headquarters.

“A peaceful and friendly Afghanistan can provide Pakistan a strategic depth.” He asked the US and Nato to come out with a clear strategy on Afghanistan.

General Kayani who last week participated in Nato commanders’ conference in Brussels said Pakistan was prepared to train the Afghan National Army which would help improve relations between the two nations. He said he hoped the offer would get a positive response.

“If we get more involved with the ANA (Afghan National Army) there’s more interaction and better understanding,” General Kayani said.

“We have opened all doors ... It’s a win-win for Afghanistan, the United States, Isaf and Pakistan,” he said, referring to Nato’s International Security Assistance Force.

He said he believed it would take at least four years to achieve a target of a 140,000-strong Afghan force able to take over security responsibilities.

Pakistan has raised concern over a similar offer by India to train Afghan army, and the issue could become another point of conflict between the two South Asian neighbours.

Pakistan’s offer reflects Islamabad’s rising concern over Indian influence in Afghanistan. “Our strategic paradigm needs to be fully realised,” General Kayani said.

He warned that an environment hostile to Pakistan could strain its battle against militancy and extremism. He said he had conveyed the concerns and constraints of Pakistan to the Nato allies.

“There are some key issues of the conflict that needed to be fully understood and addressed.”

He said there was a need for realisation of Pakistan’s key regional position and its contribution in the war.

General Kayani said more than 140,000 Pakistani troops were now involved in fighting militants in the northwest and deployment along the Afghan border.

He said over the last seven months Pakistani military had launched 209 major and 510 minor operations in 10 regions. He said 2,273 Pakistani army officers and soldiers had been killed in the fighting so far.

General Kayani said that the military operations in South Waziristan and Swat were at present in a transitory phase -- from hold to build. “We must consolidate our gains and fully stabilise the area secured lest it fall back to the terrorists,” he said.

He warned against losing sight for future operations. “Public opinion, media support, army’s capability and resolve are fundamental to our war,” he said.

General Kayani rejected the perception that Pakistan did not want to take on the militants in North Waziristan. “There is already one army division deployed there and we have taken action whenever required,” he declared

He said it was important that the military consolidated its hold in South Waziristan and other tribal regions before starting another army offensive.

Last October the army launched a major offensive in South Waziristan which had become the main bastion of Pakistani Taliban movement and Al Qaeda.

More than 30,000 troops have been involved in the operation which is said to be the biggest since Pakistan joined the US war on terror after September 11, 2001.

The troops have cleared most of the region, but there are still pockets of resistance. Many Taliban commanders have taken refuge in neighbouring Waziristan. “We have broken the myth that Waziristan cannot be controlled,” he said.

Pakistan has been facing mounting pressure from the United States to start army operation in North Waziristan which is the base for another Taliban faction.

The US and western intelligence agencies believe the area is also a base of Afghan insurgents led by Sirajuddin Haqqani. Pakistan had signed a peace deal with the Taliban faction in 2006.

General Kayani said Pakistani military’s success in South Waziristan had sent a strong message to the militants operating in North Waziristan and other areas.

“There is, however, no need at this point to start a stream roller operation in North Waziristan.”

The army chief said the large number of casualties suffered by the Pakistani security forces and economic losses had not dented the armed forces’ resolve to fight terrorism and violent extremism. “We will fight and finish the terrorism in our own interest,” General Kayani said.

He said the intelligence sharing and greater cooperation between Pakistani military and US forces had helped improve the situation. “The regular contacts between Pakistani and US military commanders have greatly helped in understanding each others’ position.”
 
.
Thanks for posting. A man of few words, which helps to get heard when he speaks. I am glad the Pakistani concerns have been put out very simply. While in no way impinging on Afghanistan's sovereignty, Pakistan's concerns with regards to regional stability have been spelled out. I hope a final settlement is mindful of Pakistani concerns.
 
.
Pakistan doesn’t want a ‘Talibanised’ Afghanistan: Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

* COAS says Pakistan does not want to control Afghanistan
* Peace in Afghanistan crucial to Pakistan’s long-term interests
* NATO told to fully realise Pakistan’s strategic paradigm


Staff Report

RAWALPINDI: Chief of Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Kayani has denied that Pakistan wants a “Talibanised” Afghanistan, and said his country has no interest in controlling Afghanistan.

“We can’t wish for anything for Afghanistan that we don’t wish for ourselves,” Kayani was quoted as saying by the AFP news agency on his return from Brussels in a rare address to foreign journalists – much of which was devoted to Afghanistan.

Kayani said peace and stability in Afghanistan were crucial to Islamabad’s long-term interests.

He said Pakistan’s military operations in 2009 had helped improve the situation in Afghanistan in terms of squeezing of spaces, better control of areas and a continuous flow of logistics.

The army chief said he had told NATO commanders that “our strategic paradigm needs to be fully realised”. He said Pakistan was the second largest Muslim nation in the world and located in a strategic region defined by competing interests with a prolonged history of conflict.

Kayani said Pakistan had contributed to peace and stability in Afghanistan. He said the country had the resolve to overcome the menace inside its own territory and had public support for it. He said human and economic losses in the war on terror had failed to deter Pakistan’s resolve.

“Pakistan has suffered the maximum in terms of human and economic losses because of terrorism and violent extremism, but it has not dented the resolve of the nation and armed forces to fight and eliminate the terrorism in accordance with our national interests.”

Kayani said Pakistan’s operations were currently in a transitory phase. “We must consolidate our gains and fully stabilise the areas secured, lest they fall back to terrorists. Constraints of capability to absorb and operate, limited cutting edge counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism capability and limited budgetary space should be factored in.”

The army chief said he had conveyed the concerns, challenges, contributions and constraints of Pakistan in the fight against the terrorists. He said he had highlighted key issues of the conflict that needed to be fully understood and addressed.

Interacting with military chiefs in Brussels, Kayani said he drew their attention to the sacrifices Pakistan had made. he said public opinion, media support, the army’s capability and resolve, a comprehensive strategy and the concept that it was “our war” had helped turn the tide against terrorism.

Kayani also offered to train the Afghan Army and police. “We have also offered to train Afghanistan’s army and police, as we have the capacity and the wherewithal to do so,” he said, adding that Pakistan should be trusted with it.
 
.
^^^I'm happy he realizes that. A Taliban takeover will be bad for neighboring countries like India or Iran but it would have the most adverse affect in Pakistan
 
.
Its good , Pakistan Participates in the Afghan Nation Building process on its own terms , ...! Morever the Afghan Reins must not fall back into the Hands of Taliban ..!
 
.
My respect to Gen. Kayani.
He used words like 'strategic depth'; was talking like an army man ;) (no offence).
On serious note, this is what i had suggested before that now Pakistan can not control Afghanistan either be an enemy or be a friend of Afghanistan. Gen. kayani's words are wiser and good read of International Tempo for Afghanistan. I can see a brighter days for Afghanistan if Pakistan will have such wiser heads in consistence. Heaven or hell all depends on Pakistan which is a universal fact. However it would be interesting to see how Pakistan will improve its PR ratings in Afghanistan and how pressure created by international communities including India will shape Pakistan's Politico-social mentality for the same.
 
.
Which country for Pakistan is the Mexico for United States?
Probably Afghanistan. Maybe one day Pak can't help the urge to try to build a "great wall" like what Americans wished to do. :rofl:
What happend to their 700 miles Great Wall project along Mexican border? :lol:

The value of Afghanistan to US is a "chicken ribs": tasteless to eat, unbearable light of losing. :rofl:
 
.
My respect to Gen. Kayani.
He used words like 'strategic depth'; was talking like an army man ;) (no offence).
On serious note, this is what i had suggested before that now Pakistan can not control Afghanistan either be an enemy or be a friend of Afghanistan. Gen. kayani's words are wiser and good read of International Tempo for Afghanistan. I can see a brighter days for Afghanistan if Pakistan will have such wiser heads in consistence. Heaven or hell all depends on Pakistan which is a universal fact. However it would be interesting to see how Pakistan will improve its PR ratings in Afghanistan and how pressure created by international communities including India will shape Pakistan's Politico-social mentality for the same.

PR rating is a non-concern for Pakistan. If there is peace and stability, the PR works itself out.
 
.
PR rating is a non-concern for Pakistan. If there is peace and stability, the PR works itself out.

Also you guys understand Afghanistan's culture & language more than anyone. A less experimenting and more friendly Pakistan can help very fast. People treating Afghanistan as its backyard are sick. When a nation will rise/revive as a stable and prosperous they will understand how important Pakistan is for them. Pakistan has ethereal capacity to have effortless cordial relationship with Afghanistan. Things will comes to you without any effort only if you have patience to wait and really think nice about Afghanistan by gut.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom