Someone who is not free.
Kashmiris want freedom from India and are denied that right by armed soldiers.
The only thing that they cannot do is ask for different country, I do not agree that is only way of saying we are free. In this criteria is taken there would be 100 of parts of world which can call themselves hostage. My point is were there any issue with people of Kashmir before the violence started.
The Kashmiris were peaceful for several decades without results. The resistance movement grew from their frustration when they realized India was never going to let them go free.
So you are saying if peaceful protest does not work you should start killing innocent people and hope they do not respond.
I cannot agree with any one,when people justify killing, because some of your demands are not met. Give me more valid reason for taking arms and I do not believe there is any reason to kill innocent.
By no means violent means should be adopted to get your demand fulfilled.
And kindly justify what peaceful means where adopted to resolve Amarnath yatra issue. What I saw in that protest is that people of Kashmir are so in tolerant that they will start stone pelting at drop of hat and does not care if anyone gets hurt.
The moment you start killing innocent you are branded terrorist and you are no more freedom fighter.
And by violent means you can never get Kashmir resolved. And this UN resolution will fail (I am willing to take a bet).
Try to take the friendship route and you will see what can be achieved. I know 2 years back we had friendly relationship between us and Mumbai spoiled everything. People are more accommodating when you are friendly.