Abu Zolfiqar
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 22,555
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
ran out of 'ammunition' i see
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, you keep saying that and the Kashmiris keep getting angrier. I am sure its is comforting to live in a world of delusions.
Nonsense. The Soviets have that blood on their hands, not Pakistan. If you wish to blame Pakistan for the post Soviet violence and chaos, then you also have to blame the Americans. Cherry picking history and concocting numbers to make fantastic claims does not make your arguments any more valid, it only illustrates how desperate you are to resort to such rhetorical tactics.
Why not? People can multi-task, and at the moment the Kashmiris are physically expressing their disgust and anger with the Indian occupation and invaders, and therefore Pakistanis should do their bit to support them in that endeavor.
Commentators say many things, they are not seers - but what is true is the depravity of many Indians in cheering the occupation and oppression of people and the blatant violation of the promise to those people of self-determination. Puts the whole 'tolerant, secular India BS' in complete perspective doesn't it? Bigots, hate-mongers and people stuck in a time warp seeking to avenge the 'Muslim invader' from hundreds of years ago.
ran out of 'ammunition' i see
The terrorism in Pakistan is primarily the result of the Afghan conflict, and the US invasion of Afghanistan, and not the Kashmir conflict.
And I fail to see how any Indian can morally and ethically not support the right to self-determination promised to Kashmiris by India herself.
india knows what to do ?.who cares 4 un(unable).btw un is in u.sa.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
no sir,u will c result in future.
Also check out the NYT interactive, with some very touching pictures:
India Faces Broader Revolt in Kashmir - Slide Show - NYTimes.com
So you're suggesting that UN has no say and should have no say in the issues at global level? Don't bring UN-has-no-teeth arguments to justify your statement.
I'm not sure if this would have been the response if the UN were to hypothetically rule tomorrow that Kashmir is a part of India.
Double standards.
y do they cover there faces.they know forces will grill them if identified
seems your country is trying to push hard to gain the chair on the security council of this ''un(able)'' as you so dub it
will your presence suddenly make it ''able''
are your troops so unable to quell existentialists that they like to wear the helmets?
it's unfortunate that you choose to turn a blind eye to the atrocities being committed in Kashmir while concurrently claiming that it is an ''integral part'' of hindustan next door...
for that to be the case, the people would have to support your presence there; which clearly, they aren't as we are seeing firsthand on the news
trying for 60+ years, and the time hasnt come yet??? Well Once the kashmiris will Learn from there mistakes and Find out who the Real culprits are... Lol... Lets wait and see...
no sir this was not my meaning.u can c the policies of the un.un seems to be a big failure.i think un is ruled by some powerful countries.
i dont know wat indian presence will do in un.on next point,sir no country allows it's part to be broken at any cost.i dont know abt pk,but india and indian considers as our state rather than even a disputed territory.