Kashmir | News & Discussions.

[AHMED85]

What fair talks are you talking about? On Kashmir? We cannot have talks that compromises India’s Integrity

cool down man you have some advance thinking for India
but it is essential for Indian solidarity and peace to solve Kashmir other wise second option is danger for both.
hosh kai nakon loo.........

 

[Jade]

cool down man you have some advance thinking for India
but it is essential for Indian solidarity and peace to solve Kashmir other wise second option is danger for both.
hosh kai nakon loo.........

What use is peace without integrity?

 

[AHMED85]

What use is peace without integrity?

what do you mean integrity
you will make peace in Ashia if your thinker consider on it .

 

[karan.1970]

No Karan. it was east pakistan and had been east Pakistan from 1947 to 1970 and india interfered in internal matters of Pakistan.

And Kashmir was an independent entity in 1947 in whose internal affairs pakistan interfered.

 

[Jade]

what do you mean integrity
you will make peace in Ashia if your thinker consider on it .

Integrity for us means totality.

 

[AHMED85]

And Kashmir was an independent entity in 1947 in whose internal affairs pakistan interfered.

But Kashmirs do not think the Kashmir is a part of India as well as Pakistan if you need some reality try to find him in the heart of kashmires. with out any type of killing and cruelness ...
stop trolling.

 

[AHMED85]

Integrity for us means totality.

who take two two make quarrel.
remember it

 

[paritosh]

One thing that Pathans have is morals about women sanctity, so i will not be intrested even reading all this, the guy who wrote this may an anti Pathans and so his deductions about raping muslim women is his imagination running wild.

well...9/10 Pathans have a strict adherence to Pakthunwali...but there are crazy people everywhere...
but no one rapes men...and if they do...it makes up for a bigger news than that...!

 

[EjazR]

Daily Times - Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2009 challenged in Supreme Court

ISLAMABAD: A petition seeking the declaration of the Gilgit-Baltistan (empowerment and self-governance) Order 2009 as ‘ultra vires’ of the constitution was filed in the Supreme Court on Thursday.

The petition was filed by Shafqat Ali Khan – resident of Panyal tehsil in Ghizar district – under Article 184(3) of the constitution through Muhammad Ikram Chaudhry advocate, making the federal government the respondent in the case.

The petition contended that the 2009 order was in total negation of the rights of citizens belonging to Gilgit and Baltistan and in disregard of the constitution. “The Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2009 gives a formula that is inconsistent with the constitution, thus it is liable to be cancelled and declared ultra-vires of the constitution”, the petition said.

It said the order of 2009 is also against the SC judgement of 1999 SCMR 1379, where the apex court directed the federation to take appropriate steps to ensure the right to self-rule and independent judiciary for the Northern Areas of Pakistan.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

What part of the constitution is the G-B Order 2009 against?

Since G-B is technically not part of Pakistan and is not considered a part of Pakistan under the constitution, I am unsure as to what exactly is being challenged as being 'unconstitutional'.

 

[Jade]

But Kashmirs do not think the Kashmir is a part of India as well as Pakistan if you need some reality try to find him in the heart of kashmires. with out any type of killing and cruelness ...
stop trolling.

Firstly, all Kashmiris don’t want independence or plebiscite. Only a minuscule number residing in Kashmir Valley may want a plebiscite. However, Just because Tibetans think that they don’t belong to China doesn't mean China should grant independence or plebiscite. If that is the case there would be thousands of states based on religion, ethnicity, ideologies, and languages

 

[jarnee]

^^^^OMG PAKISTANIS REALLY DID THIS

self corrected

 

[jarnee]

last hope for solution favorable to Pakistan was in Musharraf era.

 

[ice_man]

Op Polo - the Hyderabad action took place in 1948.

Pak was inside J&K in 1947.

NOPE! junagadh was annexed by indian in november & plebisicte was held in december!

The Nawab acceded to the Dominion of Pakistan on 15 August 1947. Pakistan accepted this on 13 September. When Pakistan confirmed the acceptance of the accession in September, the Government of India was outraged that Muhammad Ali Jinnah could accept the accession of Junagadh despite his argument that Hindus and Muslims could not live as one nation.[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel believed that if Junagadh was permitted to go to Pakistan, it would exacerbate the communal tension already simmering in Gujarat.

The princely state was surrounded on all three sides by India, with an outlet to the Arabian Sea. The unsettled conditions in Junagadh had led to a cessation of all trade with India and the food position became precarious. The region was in crisis and the Nawab was forced to flee to Karachi with his family fearing for his life and established a provisional government with his followers.

Patel offered Pakistan time to void the accession and to hold a plebiscite in Junagadh. Samaldas Gandhi formed a government-in-exile, the Aarzi Hukumat (in Urdu:Aarzi: Temporary, Hukumat: Government) of the people of Junagadh. Eventually, Patel ordered the forcible annexation of Junagadh's three principalities. Junagadh's state government, facing financial collapse and lacking forces with which to resist Indian force, invited the Government of India to take control in October. A plebiscite was conducted in December.

 

[ice_man]

No..
It was because the Raja of Kashmir had signed standstill agreements with both India and Pakistan.
But Pakistan cunningly used the pastun tribesmen to invade Kashmir, thereby not officially breaking the standstill agreement..
India intervened only after raja Hari Singh signed the instrument of accession, acceding the princely state of J&K to Indian union, after the pastun tribesmen backed by Pakistan were about to capture Srinagar.
If Pakistan had not played the double-game of using the tribesmen to invade the princely state of J&K, India would not have any excuse to send troops to Srinagar and in all possibility J&K would have remained an Independent state.. or even have merged with Pakistan.

ohh the poor indian people so nice & peace loving! so innocent makes tears come into my eyes!!