What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
Black Day Anniversary for the Kashmiris

"...people of Kashmir are yearning for peace, justice and freedom. They want a just and dignified peace that guarantees total freedom from foreign occupation and alien domination. Their struggle to achieve that right to self-determination will not be extinguished until India and Pakistan accept its exercise by the people of Jammu and Kashmir."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yesterday (October 27, 2009), Kashmiri-Canadians from coast to coast and Kashmiris all over the world observed 62nd anniversary of Indian invasion of Kashmir as a “Black Day.” It was exactly 62 years ago, on October 27th, 1947, when the Indian troops invaded and occupied a sovereign nation of Jammu and Kashmir by deception. The government of India proclaimed that her forces would help to restore normalcy in the state of Jammu and Kashmir and allow the people to exercise the right to self-determination in accordance with their freely expressed will, unhindered by any threat of internal disorder or external aggression.

Fraudulently, India did the exact opposite. Those who have followed developments in Kashmir know that the ongoing struggle for freedom began in 1931 when people came out in open revolt against then autocratic and tyrannical regime; they had nearly succeeded in over-throwing the regime when India stepped in 1947 to take over the tyrant disposed regime, faced with stiff resistance from the locals against its invasion – India transformed Kashmir into a purely military camp, killing hundreds of civilians.

The first war between India and Pakistan over Kashmir broke out in 1947. In 1948 India took the Kashmir issue to the United Nations Security Council, which constituted a special commission – the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan – with the mandate to independently investigate the matter and help the contending parties reach a negotiated settlement. The most important outcome of the deliberations of the commission were two resolutions passed by the Security Council on August 13th, 1948 and January 15th, 1949 respectively, calling upon the governments of India and Pakistan to hold a free, fair and impartial plebiscite under UN auspices in order to enable the people of Kashmir to decide whether they wanted to join India or Pakistan.

This was followed by commitments on part of the Indian leadership to allow the people of Kashmir to determine their future. In a statement to the Indian parliament on February 12th, 1951, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru said: “We had given our pledge to the people of Kashmir and subsequently to the United Nations. We stood by it and we stand by it today. Let the people of Kashmir decide.”

Failing to legalize its occupation, on August 9th, 1953, New Delhi arrested then prime minister of Jammu and Kashmir and popular leader Sheikh Abdullah in a coup d’état – the occupying forces killed more than 1,500 defenseless Kashmiri civilians to silence the massive revolt against its occupation. Since then, India has tried to gradually strengthen its grip over the occupied region by means fair and foul unmindful of its constitutional commitment about the future status of the occupied state. 1987’s rigged elections and India’s refusal to honour her commitment about the right to self-determination pushed the people of Kashmir from “passive resistance” to “militancy” against state-sponsored terrorism.

Since October 1989, the 700,000 strong Indian forces have killed more than 100,000 Kashmiris to silence the people’s demand for freedom, justice, and respect for human rights. They continue to carry out arbitrary detention, summary executions, custodial killings, extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, rape, sexual exploitation, torture and fake encounters. Generations of Kashmiris have grown up under the shadow of the gun; not a single family is unaffected; property worth hundreds of millions of dollars has been destroyed and the suffering and devastation continues unabated, sadly drawing no significant attention from the international community.

Impunity has become a license for the Indian occupation forces to wreak havoc with the lives of Kashmiris. The deliberate and unprovoked attacks and other patterns of abuse have all become too frequent to report. No perpetrator has ever been prosecuted in a real manner, despite the fact that such crimes have been extensively documented by many international human rights organizations including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.

In 2008, when India attempted to change the demography of the state of Jammu and Kashmir followed by economic blockade against the people of Kashmir it backfired; triggering tsunami of protests across Kashmir, chanting: “we want freedom,” a classic people’s movement. The Indian occupation forces fired indiscriminately on the protesters, killing hundreds of civilians, including a senior freedom movement leader Sheikh Abdul Aziz and injuring thousands more.

This year was no different, when the occupying Indian troops kidnapped and killed 17-year-old Aasiya Jan and her sister-in-law, Nilofar Shakeel, 22; their corpses were found floating in a shallow stream on May 30th, 2009 after disappearing from their family’s apple orchards in the city of Shopian in Indian-administered Kashmir. Subsequently, the occupation forces’ attempt to cover it up set off months of massive demonstrations, several protesters were killed and hundreds injured in pitched street battles between anti-India demonstrators chanting: “we want freedom,” and the Indian occupation troops using brute force to get the situation under control.

Lydia Polgreen wrote for The New York Times on August 16th, 2009: “Little more than 12 hours later their battered bodies were found in the stream. Asiya, a 17-year-old high school student, had been badly beaten. Blood streamed from her nose and a sharp gash in her forehead. She and her 22-year-old sister-in-law, Nilofa[r], had been gang raped before their deaths. “It is now the focal point for seemingly bottomless Kashmiri rage at the continuing presence of roughly 500,000 Indian security forces… ‘India says Kashmir is a free part of a free country,’ said Majid Khan, a 20-year-old unemployed man who has joined the stone-throwing mobs. ‘If that is so, why are we being brutalized? Why are women gang raped?’”

Last two years have seen spontaneous, massive and non-violent protests where virtually everyone young and old, men and women, boys and girls are out on the streets protesting against India’s continued occupation. Such – on and off – protests have totally re-energized the Kashmiri freedom struggle into a classic people’s movement, which has stunned the Indian government.

The perception that the Kashmir issue is a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan is unfounded. Kashmir is not a territorial or bilateral issue. It is about the future of 15 million people with their own history of independence; their own language and culture. This has been an explicit explanation for the failure to resolve the Kashmir issue through on-again and off-again bilateral dialogue for the past 62 years. The people of Kashmir have lost complete faith in the bilateral process of India and Pakistan and their ability to resolve the issue.

The 15 million people of Kashmir are yearning for peace, justice and freedom. They want a just and dignified peace that guarantees total freedom from foreign occupation and alien domination. Their struggle to achieve that right to self-determination will not be extinguished until India and Pakistan accept its exercise by the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

The unprecedented sacrifices and suffering experienced by the people against this volte-face in terms of death and destruction, life and property, torture and persecution, rape and repression over the years, particularly during the past 20 years, is much too great to go unrewarded. The Kashmiri freedom movement is now entering its twenty-first year with firm and unwavering courage and determination in the face of unspeakable suffering and injustices to achieve the right to self-determination. The ground reality is very encouraging as the people are determined to achieve freedom, therefore, the struggle is in full momentum and the demand for a UN supervised plebiscite is at an all-time high.

The right to self-determination is the cornerstone of the United Nations system that underpins the contemporary international order. Its unquestioned acceptance has been established by core international instruments including the Charter of the United Nations, the two Covenants on Civil and Political and Economic, Social and Cultural rights and the declaration adopted by General Assembly resolution 1514.

International human rights fora continue to reaffirm the validity and significance of the right of peoples to self-determination in situations of foreign occupation and alien domination. Contemporary international developments further testify the importance of this right, and its centrality to the international system.

Effective exercise of a people’s right to self-determination is an essential pre-requisite for the genuine exercise of other human rights and freedoms. Only when self-determination has been achieved can a people take the measures necessary to ensure human dignity, the full enjoyment of all rights including the political, economic, social and cultural progress without any form of discrimination.

The right to self-determination is thus the raison d’etre of the contemporary international order and an absolute must for the progressive realization of all fundamental human rights. The right must be exercised freely without covert influence, coercion or repression. It cannot be exercised under conditions of foreign occupation and it is non-lapsable.

It is high time India realized the fact that control over a region alone does not mean sovereignty over a chunk of land. It is the people who make up a nation and if they are perpetually alienated, any territorial supremacy achieved through brute force alone can never guarantee long-term peace.

The conflict in Kashmir is a “political” and “human” tragedy and the world community, including India and Pakistan, have overlooked this critically important human dimension of the issue. The Kashmiris’ demand is simple and in accordance with the international law: implementation of the United Nations resolutions for a plebiscite to determine the future status of the disputed region in a peaceful and democratic way. Whatever the outcome, it will be impartial and binding for all the three parties – India, Pakistan and the people of Kashmir.

For New Delhi to help resolve the Kashmir issue through peaceful negotiations, following actions are necessary and urgent:

India must cease all military and paramilitary actions against civilians in Kashmir.
India must end torture, custodial killings and extra-judicial executions of prisoners immediately.
India must withdraw its military and paramilitary forces from all the urban areas immediately.
India must release all the prisoners immediately arrested or captured in connection with the resistance movement and false cases instituted against them under the so-called emergency laws must be withdrawn.
India must annul the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, the National Security Act and the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, with respect to Kashmir, immediately.
India must bring to justice all those killers and murderers who have committed horrendous crimes against innocents in Kashmir during the past 20 years. Or transfer all such cases to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for impartial justice.
India must continue to help the displaced Kashmiri Hindu families to resettle in their homes in Kashmir and provide them all necessary assistance.
India must allow International human rights monitors and the world media to visit Kashmir for their investigative work.
Last but not least, India, Pakistan and the people of Kashmir together with help from the international community can resolve the Kashmir issue peacefully; it may be time that India return to the negotiating table to resolve the 62-year-old Kashmir issue; this is essential for regional peace and security.
Informed and conscientious Canadians can play a vital role in the education process by interacting with parliamentarians and the media. In addition, concerned Canadians can write to the UN Secretary General, NGOs, and call or write to the Prime Minister and Foreign Minister to voice their concern about systematic human rights abuses in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The cause for which the people of Kashmir are struggling is a just one, and deserves support from all those who cherish peace and justice.
 
http://www.ptinews.com/news/351241_Life-paralysed-across-Kashmir-valley-due-to-strike

Srinagar, Oct 28 (PTI) Normal life was crippled across Kashmir valley today in response to a strike called by separatists to protest the visit of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Singh along with UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and several cabinet colleagues including Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee, Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad and New and Renewable Energy Minister Farooq Abdullah arrived here on a two day visit this morning.

Shops and business establishments, educational institutions, banks and courts remained closed and traffic was off the roads in Srinagar and other major towns of the valley in response to the strike call given by hardline faction of Hurriyat Conference headed by Syed Ali Shah Geelani and supported by various other separatist organisations.

Yesterday, Kashmir valley observed a general strike called by separatists against the 62nd anniversary of the landing of Indian troops in the state.
 
PM opens first rail link between Jammu and Kashmir

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has inaugurated the train service between Anantnag-Qazigund section, which will connect the Kashmir valley to the rest of the country and is making an important speech on the dialogue his government has promised to the state.

Singh, who is undertaking a two-day visit to the state, the first during his second tenure, flagged off the new train service on the 18-km line which will link the valley with Srinagar and other important places.

He is addressing a public meeting in which he may speak on the dialogue with all shades of opinion in the state.

Home Minister P Chidambaram had recently said that the government would hold talks with every section of political opinion in the state through "quiet dialogue, quiet diplomacy" to find a political solution to the Kashmir problem that may be "unique".

Several Union Ministers including Ghulam Nabi Azad, Farooq Abdulah, Mamata Banerjee and Chief Minister Omar Abdullah are attending the inaugural ceremony.

With the opening of the line, the Railways have completed 119 km long Qazigund-Baramulla section of the Kashmir rail project.
PM opens first rail link between Jammu and Kashmir- Hindustan Times
 
A curtain raiser on Kashmir railway link

When Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will flag off train on the 18-km stretch of Qazigund-Anantnag on Wednesday, he will be sixth prime minister to lead such railway ceremonies in Jammu and Kashmir.

Prior to Singh, five Prime Ministers --- Indira Gandhi, her son Rajiv Gandhi, I K Gujral, Deve Gowda and Atal Bihari Vajpayee -- besides UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi have been part of the ceremonies related to the project.

It was in 1898 that the then Dogra rulers conceived a rail link between Kashmir and the rest of the country. It took more than nine decades to push for the dream project when in 1983 Indira Gandhi laid a foundation stone for 54-km Jammu -Udhampur stretch.

It was promised that the rail link thereafter would be extended by 290 km to Baramulla in the Valley. For fours years there was no progress and it was in 1986 that Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi performed the same ritual for the second time in the same Udhampur town. Railway minister Suresh Kalmadi, who announced the same plan again in 1995, followed Gandhi.

In 1996, Prime Minister P V Narsimha Roa sanctioned Rs 2600 crores for the extension of the rail link from Udhampur to Baramulla, covering 290 kms. The Congress, however, lost the power at the Centre.

Rao's successor Deve Gowda laid another ritualistic foundation stone in March 1997, again in Udampur. Just two months later, his successor I K Gujral flew all the way to the Valley for the same ceremony, this time at Baramulla.

For 19 years, the link to Kashmir could not see the light of the day. In 2003, it was Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee who declared it a national project. The railway project that still remains incomplete witnesses piecemeal inauguration now and then, even for as small a stretch as 17 km.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2005 finally inaugurated a stretch -- 54 km long Jammu Udhampur -- of this 344 km rail link.

The remaining project has been divided into three parts - 41 km long Udhampur to Katra, 130 km long Katra to Qazigund and 119 km Qazigund to Baramulla. In the final stage, it will stretch from north to south Kashmir.

The 66 km long section of Qazigund Baramulla - from Anantnag to Mazhama -was inaugurated by the PM Manmohan Singh in October last year, Sonia Gandhi later doing the honours of inaugurating the 35-km long section from Mazhom to Baramulla early this year.
A curtain raiser on Kashmir railway link- Hindustan Times

---------- Post added at 05:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 AM ----------

Farooq hopes train in Kashmir will bring development

Former chief minister and Minister for New and Renewable Energy Farooq Abdullah Wednesday hoped that the Kashmir Valley would soon be linked by train to the rest of India.

"I hope the train will soon connect the valley with the rest of the country. There are lots of places within and outside the railways has to link with the state. This will end many of our difficulties. I hope we will see the train from Kashmir reaching other parts of the country soon," Abdullah said.

"This will generate employment for lots of Kashmiris and bring development in the backward state," he said in his short speech.

He was speaking on the occasion of the inauguration of a train service linking Qazigund to Anantnag district. This will connect south Kashmir with Srinagar and other parts of the north of the valley.

Abdullah demanded that the minimum qualification to get lower grade employment in railways should be Class 8 for backward places like Jammu and Kashmir.

He expressed his gratitude to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and United Progressive Alliance chairperson Sonia Gandhi for taking out time to visit the valley to flag off the rail service.

Farooq hopes train in Kashmir will bring development- Hindustan Times
 
Normal life paralysed across Kashmir valley due to strike

Normal life was crippled across Kashmir valley on Wednesday in response to a strike called by separatists to protest the visit of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Singh along with UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and several cabinet colleagues including Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee, Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad and New and Renewable Energy Minister Farooq Abdullah arrived here on a two day visit this morning.

Shops and business establishments, educational institutions, banks and courts remained closed and traffic was off the roads in Srinagar and other major towns of the valley in response to the strike call given by hardline faction of Hurriyat Conference headed by Syed Ali Shah Geelani and supported by various other separatist organisations.

Yesterday, Kashmir valley observed a general strike called by separatists against the 62nd anniversary of the landing of Indian troops in the state.

Geelani asked the people to observe a complete strike against the visit of the Prime minister.

Supporting the strike call, President of Democratic Freedom Party and senior executive member of Moderate Hurriyat Shabir Ahmad Shah said, "People should observe complete shutdown against Indian Prime Minister's visit to Valley and confine themselves to their homes".

In view of the strike and the visit of the Prime Minister, police and paramilitary forces have been deployed in strength to maintain law and order and scuttle any attempt by separatists to stage demonstrations.

Normal life paralysed across Kashmir valley due to strike- Hindustan Times
 
So since you can't prove that Kashmir was first invaded by the Indian army, you start the canard of plebiscite? That's just pathetic debating skills.

Pakistan and india where divided along the lines of majority muslim ares going to pakistan and the rest to india.......anybody with half a brain would know that kashmir should belong to pakistan.
D o you see us complaning about majority hindu areas with muslim rulers being invaded by the indians so that the the hindus can live with india....Junagadh being one example.
The Government of Pakistan protested, saying that since the Nawab had chosen to accede to Pakistan, the Dewan had no authority to negotiate a settlement with India. Also, if India could acquire Kashmir (with an overwhelming Muslim majority) because its ruler had decided to accede to India, then Pakistan could claim Junagadh.

Here, from a neutral source -

From the BBC also.
What freedom means in Kashmir
BBC NEWS | South Asia | What freedom means in Kashmir


So, what were you saying? Something about Indian media brainwashing stories? :lol:
It is obvious who has been brainwashed.

Thats strange...how come the BBC is also reporting that the people of kashmir want to be free of indian occupation.



This is no separatist sentiment in either Meghalaya or Arunachal. If there is, it is no negligible that it has no impact in the mainstream. In assam, the Ulfa is all but finished. In fact the biggest headache for the people of Assam is the S-Ulfa or the surrendered Ulfa. The same can be said of Punjab and Mizoram. As far as nagaland goes, there is a cease fire between the main separatist group and the central government. The only state that can be described as a separatist hot bed is Manipur. And Tripura? Seriously?

So your willing to have a vote in Manipur and Tripura to see if they want to be part of india.



Really, as i said before, when confronted with facts, you guys just make things up, don't you? EPIC FAIL.

Who said......

[We] have no desire to impose our will on Kashmir … Our assurance [is] that we shall withdraw our forces from Kashmir … And leave the decision regarding the future of this state to the people …through the democratic method of free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nation. The pledge we have given not only to the people of Kashmir but also to the world. We will not, can not back out of it.”

facts are hard to swallow:cheesy:
 
These are not worth it.

90% of Pakistanis it seems (Including Asim, Dabong etc - champions of Kashmir cause on this forum) believe that UN resolution has provisions for an Independent Kashmir.

So if there is no provisions for an Independent Kashmir but there is one where they choose between india or pakistan or is that also some brainwashing that has taken place.

How much more delusional and brainwashed can one be. I found out in a discussion and since then refused to get into a debate over Kashmir with individuals given to misinformation. Best part is they will continue to live in their delusional world despite confrontation.

As you indians always tell us that kashmiris are so happy under the indians why not put it to the test and have a vote:rofl:.......after all the kashmiris love india and will vote for for tou wont they:cheesy:
 
You sadly are mistaken brother. 90% of the Pakistanis on this forum mistakenly believe that Kashmir belongs to Pakistan and that India should just hand over the whole of Kashmir to Pakistan. That is their delusion. Offcourse in reality 90% of Pakistanis do not care about the issue of Kashmir. They are happy with the status quo and are more concerned with issues which affects Pakistan itself. Then again this forum is usually visited by certain Pakistanis whose blind nationalism outweighs any sense of logic. Some of the comments relating to other countries and denials about Pakistan is laughable and established fact becomes fiction and vice versa. Their version of history has been re-written endlessly and in 10 years time we should not be surprised to hear from some Pakistanis that the civil war in Pakistan was a non-event and that Pakistan was actually fighting a war against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Dr Goebels once said that "if you repeat something often enough it may cause a few to blindly believe the statement. Those few in turn are better weapons in propaganda than the mightiest of weapons in war." How true his perception proved when a few Nazis were required to slaughter millions of Jews. Pakistan's propaganda machine clearly has adequete conversions to its cause. Sometimes however those that are used to demean your enemy with blind hatred, lies and propaganda turn around to bite you with their blind hatred and brainwashed misguidance. Surely Pakistan should know that by now and should stop trying to poke its finger up India's nose by stirring wanton hatred and unfounded negative perceptions about their issues with India. :coffee:

You guys really have been brainwashed beyond any hope of any return when you totally forget that it was you indians that went to the UN and nehru was the one that promised a vote on the issue......why do you always forget your history and twist and turn and blame everybody else.
 
BERNAMA - More Muslims Killed In Kashmir By Militants

NEW DELHI, Oct 27 (Bernama) -- More Muslims have been killed in Kashmir which has been plagued by militancy over the last two decades, said a senior Indian minister.

Indian Health and Family Welfare Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, a Kashmiri himself and former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir said 14,808 Muslims lost their lives while 1,748 Hindus and 115 Sikhs were killed during the rein of militancy in the state since 1989.

"Two decades of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir have killed far more Muslims than people of other communities. Terrorist activities have led to destruction, deprivation and wrecked the socio-economic situation, marred the education, health and communication sectors, and played havoc with tourism sector.

"As it happens in all militancy affected areas, the common man is the real sufferer. A Kashmiri stands hapless today, witnessing his own destruction mutely," Ghulam said Tuesday.

He was speaking at the 2nd International Conference on "Terrorism - National and International" organised by the Jama Masjid United Forum, a social movement that strongly denounces terrorism.

Several armed separatist militant groups had helped foment violent terrorist activities in Jammu and Kashmir, which had crippled the picturesque valley for years.

Although it has come under control in recent years, sporadic militant attacks continue to risk the valley's peace and security.

"The acts of terrorism across the globe underscore terrorism as a global threat that transcends borders and religions and is not linked to any specific sect, religion or creed," he added.
 
Last edited:
So if there is no provisions for an Independent Kashmir but there is one where they choose between india or pakistan or is that also some brainwashing that has taken place.
Yes it does make a difference. It takes away the moral high ground Pakistan wishes to take all the while on Kashmir issue. Pakistani interest in Kashmir is well and truely materialistic with emotional jingoism peppered in for good measure.

As you indians always tell us that kashmiris are so happy under the indians why not put it to the test and have a vote:rofl:.......after all the kashmiris love india and will vote for for tou wont they:cheesy:
Why should we?? We don't want to. We went to UN at that time willingly and changed the policy since. At that time we did not think that conditions were being adhered to by Pakistan. If a plebiscite was to happen, it had to be on terms agreeable to India. You pissed us off and so - No deal.

The resolution is not binding and requires agreement of both parties. Newsflash --- India does not agree anymore. We have nothing to prove to Pakistan - cry as much as it may. Last thing we require a certificate of approval from an imploding state.

Time has changed and so has demographics and several other factors. We do not think it is a good idea anymore.

Only reason the demand is repeated is because of imperialist Pakistani agenda who want more land.

I will repeat - the resolution is not binding and we are no longer interested - which part is so difficult to understand.
 
You guys really have been brainwashed beyond any hope of any return when you totally forget that it was you indians that went to the UN and nehru was the one that promised a vote on the issue......why do you always forget your history and twist and turn and blame everybody else.

The issue of the plebiscite was promised subject to certain conditions which Pakistan railroaded. The real brainwashing is being done in your country. Firstly imagine a scenario where an unstable Pakistan is given the territory of Kashmir. That would be tantamount to India committing suicide
 
Yes it does make a difference. It takes away the moral high ground Pakistan wishes to take all the while on Kashmir issue. Pakistani interest in Kashmir is well and truely materialistic with emotional jingoism peppered in for good measure.

But pakistanis is willing to have a independent kashmir...are you?


Why should we?? We don't want to. We went to UN at that time willingly and changed the policy since. At that time we did not think that conditions were being adhered to by Pakistan. If a plebiscite was to happen, it had to be on terms agreeable to India. You pissed us off and so - No deal.

Like a little child throwing his toys out of the cot when faced with the simple truth.....the kashmiris hate india!

The resolution is not binding and requires agreement of both parties. Newsflash --- India does not agree anymore. We have nothing to prove to Pakistan - cry as much as it may. Last thing we require a certificate of approval from an imploding state.

All United Nations General Assembly resolutions that are not about matters internal to the UN (such as the structure of the UN or the creation of UN agencies) are inherently and explicitly (in the UN Charter) non-binding.

Time has changed and so has demographics and several other factors. We do not think it is a good idea anymore.

If thats the case we want junagarh and the other sytes that wanted to be part of pakistan and we want the sikhs to choose if they want to be part of pakistan punjab also.

I will repeat - the resolution is not binding and we are no longer interested - which part is so difficult to understand.

Try to understand what a non binding resolution is first.
 
Arre..

Nothing has changed over 60 + yrs , and nothing will.

The bogey is mostly about water & its control. Black & White days come & go .

Lastly, Kashmir did not accede to India, Jammu & Kashmir did.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom