What's new

Kashmir India’s internal matter: Bangladesh Foreign Minister tells Pak FM

can you read the message depicted in the picture of the flags in post no. 1? if I try to explain it to the mods they won't understand it for 1 of 2 reasons; either they are too thick or too afraid

Yes, I can also see something similar written in the very first sentence.

I simply pay no attention, and understand that most Pakistanis must now know better concerning everything related to Hindustan.
 
You supplied fighter jets to Myanmar when they were killing & raping Rohingyas.Remember that.
Anyway that's neither here nor there.Disappointing statement by BD FM.Kashmir is a Muslim issue, as much as it's a humanitarian issue.We should have at least been neutral or supported Kashmir.When will we realize that the Muslims of the subcontinent must stick together?
The GoB may side with India, but the common Bangladeshis support our Kashmiri brothers & sisters.Except few people with slave-mentality towards India.
@Super Falcon, @litman


No We Didn't We Scraped That Contract

https://morning.pk/story/11661
 
What in Earth our foreign Minister was thinking when he decided to call Bangladeshi Minister? We all know the current regime is owned by Bharat.
 
No We Didn't We Scraped That Contract

https://morning.pk/story/11661
Your source is outdated.Here's one from earlier this year.
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/a...fighters-amid-air-force-modernisation-efforts

Quoted from the article,
Recent footage has revealed that Myanmar’s Air Force has received its first JF-17B fighter jets - a twin seat variant of the JF-17 Block 2 jointly developed and manufactured by China and Pakistan. Myanmar is currently one of just two confirmed export clients for the JF-17 alongside the Nigerian Air Force, and has received over a dozen fighters.
 
Last edited:
We are talking about the same people who insist on re-writing history whenever it suits them, and try to use every lie to connect Pakistan with Hindustan for the already announced and historically well known purpose of ethnic cleansing and eventual assimilation.

Here's the reality, the Mughals were the kings of Hindustan, and had no direct claim in that capacity on any land outside the historical boundary set by the Sirhind marker. They did, however, at various times, control many cities as far as Kabul.

Of those, west of Hindustan lay the city of Lahore, and is today on Pakistan's eastern most border, which had been established in its current form by Mahmud Ghaznavi and Malik Ayaz, who rebuilt and repopulated the city from the ground up to be an exclusively Muslim and Afghan-Persianite regional centre of excellence. That's where the roots of the modern state of Pakistan and its eventual demography can be placed, and final affirmation came with the Durrani Empire largely setting the boundaries of both the modern states of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It largely stayed that way until the arrival of the British in the late 19th century, which led to a radical change in the city's and of other locations' demographics and even language being replaced by that of the Mughals of Hindustan, and those actions have continued to haunt Pakistan to this day.

There is absolutely no historical connection between Pakistan and Hindustan, and people who go on about the so-called subcontinent as a larger homeland are either ignorant or have an agenda that will destroy everything that brought Pakistan into existence.
 
Last edited:
According to Humayun, the second Mughal ruler of Hindustan and son of Babur.
The four brothers were united in Lahore, but every day they were informed that Sher Shah was getting closer and closer. When he reached Sirhind, Humayun sent an ambassador carrying the message "I have left you the whole of Hindustan [i.e. the lands to the East of Punjab, comprising most of the Ganges Valley]. Leave Lahore alone, and let Sirhind be a boundary between you and me." Sher Shah, however, replied "I have left you Kabul. You should go there." Kabul was the capital of the empire of Humayun's brother Kamran, who was far from willing to hand over any of his territories to his brother. Instead, Kamran approached Sher Shah and proposed that he actually revolt against his brother and side with Sher Shah in return for most of the Punjab. Sher Shah dismissed his help, believing it not to be required, though word soon spread to Lahore about the treacherous proposal, and Humayun was urged to make an example of Kamran and kill him. Humayun refused, citing the last words of his father, Babur, "Do nothing against your brothers, even though they may deserve it."

Even Wikipedia can't always keep primary sources out, although contains a note asking for a non-primary source (i.e. not the Akbar-nama).

Source
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humayun#In_Lahore
 
Could it be that @Black_cats and @Riyad are Bhai-Bhai behind the screen!!!

I doubt it. @Black_cats is too patriotic to be of Riyad's ilk.He has always defended Bangladesh from what I have seen.
@Riyad on the other hand seems to be more on the side of India than Bangladesh.Won't be surprised if he is actually a false flagger masquerading as a Bangladeshi.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it. @Black_cats is too patriotic to be of Riyad's ilk.He has always defended Bangladesh from what I have seen.
@Riyad on the other hand seems to be more on the side of India than Bangladesh.Won't be surprised if he is actually a false flagger masquerading as a Bangladeshi.

This is off topic but, I applaud your realism in your posts.

Also, the author of the original article is a turd, but there is probably some truth to it.

Also also, this government of BD is an embarrassment.
 
Are you afraid to tell the truth?
He is not afraid I think . Because What Bangladesh is officially saying , this is not the voice of the common peoples of Bangladesh . Bangladesh is just doing diplomacy , but common folks ( from both Bangladesh and most other Muslim countries ) are too savage to understand this diplomacy .

Some Muslims are hypocrites too . Their country sold Plane to Killers when killers were killing Rohingyas . but when Bangladesh do any diplomacy , they label Hasina as Munafiq and Indian dalal or many bad names . As they believe that we are going to give them a hoot about what they think of our govt . However hypocrites are worst enemy of Islam .

However common Bangladeshis were neither friendly nor inimical towards India . But Some actions of India ( specially BJP govt ) giving a clear message that Hindutva ideology is not safe for other sovereign entity .
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom