You see, you deserve a response befitting your posts, hence, abstaining from a comprehensive response as you require attention, and that needs time, which I don't have right now.
However:
1.
What is your issue here? I fail to understand.
(i) You don't accept the Instrument of Accession.
(ii) You don't accept the Sovereign's statement on the said accession.
(iii) You don't accept the accepted and proclaimed leader of the Kashmiris at the time - Sheikh Abdullah's acceptance of the Instrument of Accession. Indeed, you have now taken to denounce him, thereby insulting every Kashmiri of the time, who had full faith and backed him every move during the years leading up to 1947.
(iv) You ignore your own acceptance of the territories south of Manawar as International Boundary between India and Pakistan vide Karachi Agreement of 1949 (copy appended vide
http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/IN PK_490729_ Karachi Agreement.pdf).
This area, south of Manawar, is opposite Jammu-Katra-RS Pura-Sambha, all parts of J&K. By signing on the dotted lines that day, you have indeed accepted and recognized the same. So you mean to tell me, you are now backtracking from your agreement as signed by you as a legal sovereign nation? Please clarify that point. Don't side step the issue as you have been doing so far.
Other than the fact that you are sticking to the stand taken by GoP since 1947, I really am yet to see any point of relevance or facts here.
2.
By extension of the logic, so is the case of Gilgit, Baluchistan et al. Gilgit was a result of mutiny, show me your plebiscite/referendum.
Now, I am curious as to what is your position on the State of Jammu & Kashmir? Because your statements are contradictory, at times claiming it as an entity and at others, challenging the legal basis of the same as a princely state. Wgat do you think, should we take the whole question of J&K according to regions? If so, why have you refused to state as such in all the resoultions till date? You are merely indulging in a circumlocutory act.
By the ways
@Joe Shearer has aptly pointed out the non-validity of your contentions on the aforementioned points. So, your points have no merit.
However, since you are talking of independently verifying, the same holds for all accessions done on either side, so meaning, should we now question the whole accession on both sides and merely allow China to move in?
My friend, are you Chinese? I could not come across a more ludicrous logic, as stated by you, other than to serve the aims of the Chinese, who have claims to every inch of earth where any one remotely a part of China even urinated! Lately they have included waters, so since their ships dispose off the waste by evacuation into ocean, you may as well hand them the oceans shortly.
3.
Yikes. Under Chapter VI? Now you are tickling me. Stop
4.
Interesting. So we occupied valley if we go by your logic so far. So why are you quoting the law which is again antithetical to your own position?
You see, your reading is tremendous, but your posting of facts in bits and pieces is merely a ploy at obfuscation ....
5.
Now again an antithetical point.
We also say the same. Good luck with that.
Anyways, I am curious, can you point out to me any place where Pakistan has signed a document allowing Kashmiris a right to self determination?
I couldn't find any.
They signed all documents pertaining to question of accession either to India or Pakistan. And the dumb buggers in valley have no clue that they are up a creek of excreta without a paddle.
Yet I find Pakistanis here championing their right to independence .....
@PaklovesTurkiye your comment on last two lines?
Nah. Am on (s)troll mode. Got a bugger of an exam on 30 Sep (and should be off line now
). Recertification. So avoiding engaging you.
He is enough. I am merely enjoying his wordplay. Amazing. Even his critics respect that!!! LOL
As for the underlined, we both are supposedly "imperfect" Indians, I getting bracketed with
@Joe Shearer for talking of peace as opposed to war.
So, aim is to guide the disbelievers (they actually think
@Joe Shearer is paid agent of Pakistan!!!) who would rather have us go down a war path as opposed to peace.