What's new

K9-Vajra chassis for new L&T tank for the Indian Army

.
someone is promoting its crapy youtube channel here.. @Mods please ban it..
 
. .
@Mods There should be a blanket ban on youtube videos here unless it has strong links to reality and reference. Every single noob opens up a channel and starts spewing nonsense over rumors and disinformation. They not only poison minds of gullible people but also give more space to trolls here.
 
. . . .
Ladakh standoff: DRDO weighs options to make indigenous light tanks

Ajai Shukla

August 3, 2020

The ministry of defence (MoD) last month fast-tracked the emergency purchase of light tanks to counter possible attacks by over 20,000 Chinese troops poised on the Ladakh border along with tanks, artillery, air defence guns and road construction units. To eliminate the costly and time-consuming import of light tanks, the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) has developed plans for building an indigenous light tank for use in mountains and in jungle terrain.

Arrayed on the Ladakh border is the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA’s) new light tank, the small, agile and versatile ZTQ 105 – also known as the Type 15 tank. To counter these, India’s Ladakh garrison has just three tank regiments with a total of 150 old T-72 medium tanks.

Weighing a hefty 42 tonnes, the T-72 is designed for the plains; movement on mountain roads is slow and often impossible. Given the limited elevation and depression of its heavy gun, the T-72 cannot engage targets on hilltops and in valleys.

In contrast, the Indian army has used light tanks to great effect in the mountains. In 1944, it used Stuart and Sherman tanks in the battle of Kohima. In 1948 these same tanks pushed back Pakistan forces in the Zojila pass. Against China in 1962, the army used light AMX-13 tanks in the battle of Gurung Hill near Pangong Tso and also deployed them in Bomdila and Dirang in Arunachal Pradesh. In the 1971 Bangladesh campaign, French AMX-13 and Soviet PT-76 tanks played a stellar role in the battle of Garibpur.

Business Standard learns the DRDO has short-listed two options for developing an indigenous light tank within 18 months. Both these involve marrying the DRDO’s tank development expertise created while developing the Arjun tank, with the defence manufacturing capability of companies such as Larsen & Toubro that are already building the K9 Vajra self-propelled gun system.

The first option involves creating a 34-35 tonne tank by fitting a 105 millimetre Cockerill gun turret onto a K-9 Vajra hull, powered by a 1,000 horsepower MTU engine optimised for high altitudes. DRDO sources say this hybrid tank could go into production within 18 months.

The DRDO’s second option retains the K-9 Vajra hull and MTU engine, but matched with the gun turret of the T-90S tank that the army already uses. This 38-tonne tank would also require 18 months for going into production.

Larsen & Toubro is assembling the K-9 Vajra under licence from South Korea and will deliver its current order by next year. If the K-9 Vajra chassis is to form the basis for an Indian light tank, it would have to extend that licence.

The DRDO is confident that either of these hybrid tanks would be better options than what the MoD is considering buying: the Russian Sprut SDM1. They point out that the Sprut is a tank destroyer with old technology and that no other country has bought it. Since the Russian military has bought only 24 Spruts, it is not in regular production, making it hard to meet early delivery schedules and Russia would have to be approached for spares, overhaul and future upgrades.

The DRDO has earlier attempted to develop light tanks, but there was never any real interest from the army. In the 1980s, the DRDO integrated the chassis of the Soviet BMP-1 infantry combat vehicle with a 105 millimetre gun, but the army was not interested.

Next, the DRDO mounted a French GIAT TS-90 turret and a 105 millimetre gun on the BMP chassis, which the Ordnance Factory Board was building in Odisha. Again the army was indifferent and the project was shelved.

In 2009, the army’s interest in light tanks was renewed with the sanction of two armoured brigades for high altitude operations alongside the mountain strike corps. The army issued a request for information (RFI) in 2009, but eventually T-72 tanks were deemed adequate and the RFI was abandoned.

Now, there is fresh interest with the possibility of encountering the PLA’s new ZTQ 105 light tank, built by China’s North Industries Group Corporation (NORINCO) and unveiled during the Zhuhai Air Show in 2016.

The ZTQ 105 has a 105 millimetre rifled gun that can destroy tanks at ranges of three kilometres and can fire anti-tank guided missiles that knock out tanks at ranges of 5 kilometres.

https://www.business-standard.com/a...ke-indigenous-light-tanks-120080300060_1.html
 
Last edited:
.
It is not my YouTube channel.
I didn;t say yours.. whosoeever is this it is crappy and unauthentic ... it goes against PDF's policy.. any Mods online? Please close this thread
 
. .
Sprut is imo a better option, 105mm is obsolete compared to 125mm.
 
.
It will be mainly L&T, not DRDO, they already have trained manpower and infrastructure so it suits them to convert the K9 production line into this light tank production line
Another Daydream of DRDO.
 
. .
@Mods There should be a blanket ban on youtube videos here unless it has strong links to reality and reference. Every single noob opens up a channel and starts spewing nonsense over rumors and disinformation. They not only poison minds of gullible people but also give more space to trolls here.
What if PDF makes its own content for youtube? Do you like the idea? Sadly, many members do not even like and share our postings on social media so it doesn't give much motivation to produce quality content especially for youtube knowing our effort doesn't get pdf members attention so how will it interest broader general audience. Many people like to view and follow all those crappy defense channels and all the truth gets lost.
 
.
What if PDF makes its own content for youtube? Do you like the idea? Sadly, many members do not even like and share our postings on social media so it doesn't give much motivation to produce quality content especially for youtube knowing our effort doesn't get pdf members attention so how will it interest broader general audience. Many people like to view and follow all those crappy defense channels and all the truth gets lost.

That is great idea. There are lot of people here on PDF who have the required expertise and insight to develop quality content. Problem here is most people saw the potential of making easy money via youtube by making click bait videos. The funny thing is most of the videos source their knowledge from PDF where one person presents a wish list and that becomes an authentic source. I am pretty sure we have so many professionals here with diverse backgrounds who can develop Quality material which can present the actual truth in midst of all the rumor mills. I think PDF doesn't really get much advertisement in social media domain which limits users interaction with PDF material. PDF needs more marketing in social media domain.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom