Justice Minister: Israel Must Keep Jewish Majority Even at the Expense of Human Rights

[Mamluk]

Preface to quran. This was bought in Dubai and I read it there.

Islamophobic propaganda.

Jews were driven out by Romans. Like Buddhists massacred and driven out of South Asia by Hindus.

 

[El Sidd]

Good we agree on something. Irrespective what judaism says, if Muslims claim land based on religion then so can any other religion. This ties with my other theory that Islam is in fact not a religion at all but an imperialistic template.

I am not responsible for your own observation or understanding. I am sure Ishtar will be pleased with your services as well.

As i said religious discussions are not allowed and your continued insistence does prove Indians are stupid.

Now cheer up Dikra

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Justice Minister: Israel Must Keep Jewish Majority Even at the Expense of Human Rights

Minister Ayelet Shaked addressed the proposed nation-state law, contending that Israel as a Jewish state must administer equal civil but not national rights

Revital Hovel Feb 13, 2018 2:57 AM
comments Subscribe now

• Shareshare on facebook
  
• Tweet
  
• send via email
  
• reddit
  
• stumbleupon

Justice Minister Shaked in the Knesset last month, calling for death penalty for terrorists.Olivier Fitoussi
Israeli MK: I didn't mean to shame Holocaust by calling African migrants a 'cancer'[/paste:font]

• Kahane is alive and well - in some of Israel's leading politicians

Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked said Monday that if not for the fence erected some years ago on the Egyptian border, “We would be seeing here a kind of creeping conquest from Africa.” The fence effectively stopped asylum-seekers from Sudan and Eritrea from entering the country.

In a speech to the Congress on Judaism and Democracy, Shaked also said, “I think that ‘Judaizing the Galilee’ is not an offensive term. We used to talk like that. In recent years we’ve stopped talking like that. I think it’s legitimate without violating the full rights of the Arab residents of Israel.”

The justice minister made the remarks in a wide-ranging speech on the controversy over the Jewish nation-state bill.

She further said, “There is place to maintain a Jewish majority even at the price of violation of rights.” She added, however, that maintaining a Jewish majority in Israel and acting democratically “must be parallel and one must not outweigh the other.”

Regarding the nation-state bill, Shaked said, “I was disturbed at both the position of the state and the reasoning of the justices. The state did not defend the law for national demographic reasons, it claimed only security reasons.” Shaked told the conference that “the state should say that there is place to maintain the Jewish majority even if it violates rights.”

Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter

Email*





Shaked said she believed Judaism and democracy are values that can coexist. “From a constitutional point of view there is an advantage to democracy and it must be balanced and the Supreme Court should be given another constitutional tool that will also give power to Judaism.”

The purpose of the nation-state bill, she said, was to prevent rulings interpreting the Entry to Israel Law, or a ruling like the one in the Ka’adan case in 2000 that banned discrimination against an Arab family who wanted to move to a small Jewish community that sought to bar them.

“In our laws there are universal values, rights, already enshrined in a very serious way. But the national and the Jewish values are not enshrined. Over the past 20 years, there has been more of a focus on rulings over universal values and less over the Jewish character of the state. This tool [the nation state bill] is a tool that we want to give the court for the future,” said the justice minister.

In response to a question from the interviewer, TV journalist Dana Weiss, on whether the court could not consider the Jewish character of the state without a nation-state law, she said: “It can, but it’s as if you’d say that without the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Liberty the court won’t care about dignity and human rights. It’s different when you have a constitutional tool.”

Shaked: Court could take 'equality' very far

On the coalition’s intent to keep the word “equality” out of the nation-state bill, Shaked said: “Israel is a Jewish state. It isn’t a state of all its nations. That is, equal rights to all citizens but not equal national rights.” Shaked said the word “equality” was very general and the court could take it “very far,” adding, “There are places where the character of the State of Israel as a Jewish state must be maintained and this sometimes comes at the expense of equality.”

Shaked said the nation-state bill did not deal with the issue of who is a Jew. “Everyone has his own Judaism. In the nation-state bill, when it talks about a Jew, it means the nationality.” Shaked then referred to the Ka’adan ruling and said that if such a case were to come up again or “the argument over whether it’s all right for a Jewish community to, by definition, be only Jewish, I want the answer to be ‘yes, it’s all right.’”

The question of the legality of the Family Unification Law, which prevents the unification of families where one of the couple is Palestinian and one is Arab Israeli, was twice decided at the time by the Supreme Court by one vote, with six justices supporting it and five dissenting. The justices gave precedence to security considerations over the importance of the right to maintain a family, in a case that split the Supreme Court.

In Shaked’s speeches, she often quotes the words of the late Justice Mishael Chesin, who was in the majority opinion that approved the law, in which he said Israel needed to awaken from the dream that it

On this issue, I have to agree with her and the Israeli right-wingers. Why would anyone in their right mind want their nation and race to be replaced by foreigners?

 

[gayMo]

I am not responsible for your own observation or understanding. I am sure Ishtar will be pleased with your services as well.

As i said religious discussions are not allowed and your continued insistence does prove Indians are stupid.

Now cheer up Dikra

I don't know the slang dikra or ishrar . Anyways i think you are now spent. Go and rest.

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

It depends what rabbi u ask. The ones who are tasked with projecting outwardly to non jews that they are against Israel like Hassidic jews in New York.

Or the ones who are tasked with increasing Zionism(general gangstry) in the world.

PS
Same Hassidics if you meet them in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem you will hear a very different story than when they were sweet talking you in new York.

i am sure they are capable of anything like any other human being on this planet but Judaism itself does not proposes statehood.
you can get hold of a rabbi and ask him that but as for the topic at hand and discussion. this is irrelevant.

 

[Tokhme khar]

Circa 500 BC to circa 700 AD.......all these jokers found in ME were Iranian subjects. You understand?

We own their asses!

I don't know why Iran has any claim over Israel. Because of Palestinian Shia? Anyways, India is good friend of Iran and I hope that both Iran and Israel patch up without fighting. Remember we Hindus came fighting for Hussain at karbala. Anyways hope you guys sort it out.

 

[El Sidd]

I don't know the slang dikra or ishrar . Anyways i think you are now spent. Go and rest.

you will be banned soon enough....make sure you blurt everything out Doc

 

[gayMo]

It depends what rabbi u ask. The ones who are tasked with projecting outwardly to non jews that they are against Israel like Hassidic jews in New York.

Or the ones who are tasked with increasing Zionism(general gangstry) in the world.

PS
Same Hassidics if you meet them in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem you will hear a very different story than when they were sweet talking you in new York.

Jews can have their imperia story too.

Circa 500 BC to circa 700 AD.......all these jokers found in ME were Iranian subjects. You understand?

We own their asses!

C'mon mate... That's too long ago. And Jews should have a place to call their own don't u think.

you will be banned soon enough....make sure you blurt everything out Doc

Yeh doc doc Kya bol rahe ho. I am an enngg

Islamophobic propaganda.

Jews were driven out by Romans. Like Buddhists massacred and driven out of South Asia by Hindus.

No it was called alQuran . A large book and in a proper book fair. So legit.

Circa 500 BC to circa 700 AD.......all these jokers found in ME were Iranian subjects. You understand?

We own their asses!

Also the Persian civilization used to be one of the greatest. But I believe the centuries of fighting between the Persian and Abyssinians tired them out and they couldn't stand up to the fresh legs of Islam.

 

[Mamluk]

No it was called alQuran . A large book and in a proper book fair. So legit.

Romans expelled Jews. Anything else is simply Vedic history.

Btw Jews hate idol worshipers more than anyone else. Your kind are seen as the "lowest among the Goyims". You are all like Dalits to Jews.

 

[Enigma_]

Romans expelled Jews. Anything else is simply Vedic history.

Btw Jews hate idol worshipers more than anyone else. Your kind are seen as the "lowest among the Goyims". You are all like Dalits to Jews.

This is true considering they are the first of the Abrahamic religions.

 

[gayMo]

Romans expelled Jews. Anything else is simply Vedic history.

Btw Jews hate idol worshipers more than anyone else. Your kind are seen as the "lowest among the Goyims". You are all like Dalits to Jews.

So be it. If they hate others it's their problem. Romans also expelled Jews as did Mohammed and Hitler

 

[Enigma_]

So be it. If they hate others it's their problem. Romans also expelled Jews as did Mohammed and Hitler

One of these is not like the other. Jews got expelled from a lot of states but Hitler just straight up slaughtered them.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

So be it. If they hate others it's their problem. Romans also expelled Jews as did Mohammed and Hitler

jews were expelled from 109 nations incase if you dont know

 

[gayMo]

One of these is not like the other. Jews got expelled from a lot of states but Hitler just straight up slaughtered them.

You think they were not slaughtered by the pharaohs or the Muslims?

jews were expelled from 109 nations incase if you dont know

All the more reason for them to have their lands

 

[Enigma_]

You think they were not slaughtered by the pharaohs or the Muslims?


All the more reason for them to have their lands

If you're talking about religious wars - then welcome to the ME.