Dubious
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 37,717
- Reaction score
- 80
- Country
- Location
12 hours ago • JONAH GOLDBERG | National Review Online
Author and syndicated conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg.
Down with stakeholders. The American Academy of Pediatrics has come out against affordable health care for kids. Retail medical clinics — at drugstores, Walmarts, etc. — are cropping up across the nation, thanks in part to expected longer waiting times and out-of-pocket expenses from Obamacare.
And pediatricians don’t like it. “While retail clinics may be more convenient and less costly, the AAP said they are detrimental to the concept of a ‘medical home,’ where patients have a personal physician who knows them well and coordinates all their care,” reported the Wall Street Journal.
You say “medical home,” I say locked-in customers. Tomayto-tomahto.
The pediatricians have a point, albeit a weak one. You can’t say the same about teachers unions, whose top priorities are to take care of members, even when such care comes at the expense of students. In New York City, the passion from teachers unions is all aimed at pay raises, killing charter schools and keeping rules making it harder to get rid of incompetents, criminals and even, occasionally, sexual predators.
In Michigan, until reforms from Republican leaders kicked in, the Service Employees International Union and state Democrats sought to require anyone — including parents of kids with disabilities — who received Medicaid to join a union. That way the union could collect dues.
I cite these examples because they involve children, the constituency everyone claims should come first. But this dynamic is endemic to society.
The sugar lobby bilks taxpayers to subsidize an industry that shouldn’t exist in the United States. The life insurance industry lobbies to keep inheritance taxes because people buy their products to avoid such taxes. The health insurance industry remains bought-in, literally and figuratively, to Obamacare because the prospect of becoming the equivalent of guaranteed-profitable utilities is worth the headaches of government incompetence.
When I say this dynamic is endemic to society, I do not mean under President Barack Obama, or under America or under capitalism. It is a natural human tendency. The augurs of ancient Rome fought any attempt to break their monopoly on divine prophecy by studying the flights and entrails of birds. The Luddites declared war on the machines, long before anyone had heard of Skynet, because the Luddites were market incumbents being ousted by new, and better, technology. Taxi drivers are trying to use the law to fend off companies like Uber.Every occupational group that pushes for the licensing or regulating of its industry does it, at least in part, to keep competition out.
The left-wing complaint is to blame big business and capitalism. But if you don’t think that sort of thing happens under socialist and communist systems, you don’t know anything about those systems.
Despite a century of anti-corporate rhetoric about the power of corporations, they actually come and go with amazing rapidity (Only 13 percent of firms on the Fortune 500 list in 1955 were there in 2011). But government is forever. The state has the unique ability to protect existing “stakeholders” from threats posed by innovation and competition, whether those stakeholders are businesses or unions, fat cats or philanthropies. That’s where the votes are and where the checks come from.
But progress — material, medical, economic — comes from innovation. Economist Deirdre McCloskey notes that until the 19th century, innovation was a negative word because innovators upset the established order. In her book “Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World,” McCloskey describes how for all of human history, humans lived on about $3 a day, using today’s dollars.
For 200,000 years, the line was flat until around 1800, when a culture that valued innovation spread from England to Europe and the New World. Since then .wealth skyrocketed, thanks to a culture that lets innovators pull up the stakes of existing stakeholders
In Silicon Valley, where government’s touch is light, we can see innovation at work. In health care, education and other areas where the government’s hand is heavy, we see stakeholders holding on for dear life.
Read more: Jonah Goldberg: Want an America that works? Innovate, don't regulate : Wsj
Author and syndicated conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg.
Down with stakeholders. The American Academy of Pediatrics has come out against affordable health care for kids. Retail medical clinics — at drugstores, Walmarts, etc. — are cropping up across the nation, thanks in part to expected longer waiting times and out-of-pocket expenses from Obamacare.
And pediatricians don’t like it. “While retail clinics may be more convenient and less costly, the AAP said they are detrimental to the concept of a ‘medical home,’ where patients have a personal physician who knows them well and coordinates all their care,” reported the Wall Street Journal.
You say “medical home,” I say locked-in customers. Tomayto-tomahto.
The pediatricians have a point, albeit a weak one. You can’t say the same about teachers unions, whose top priorities are to take care of members, even when such care comes at the expense of students. In New York City, the passion from teachers unions is all aimed at pay raises, killing charter schools and keeping rules making it harder to get rid of incompetents, criminals and even, occasionally, sexual predators.
In Michigan, until reforms from Republican leaders kicked in, the Service Employees International Union and state Democrats sought to require anyone — including parents of kids with disabilities — who received Medicaid to join a union. That way the union could collect dues.
I cite these examples because they involve children, the constituency everyone claims should come first. But this dynamic is endemic to society.
The sugar lobby bilks taxpayers to subsidize an industry that shouldn’t exist in the United States. The life insurance industry lobbies to keep inheritance taxes because people buy their products to avoid such taxes. The health insurance industry remains bought-in, literally and figuratively, to Obamacare because the prospect of becoming the equivalent of guaranteed-profitable utilities is worth the headaches of government incompetence.
When I say this dynamic is endemic to society, I do not mean under President Barack Obama, or under America or under capitalism. It is a natural human tendency. The augurs of ancient Rome fought any attempt to break their monopoly on divine prophecy by studying the flights and entrails of birds. The Luddites declared war on the machines, long before anyone had heard of Skynet, because the Luddites were market incumbents being ousted by new, and better, technology. Taxi drivers are trying to use the law to fend off companies like Uber.Every occupational group that pushes for the licensing or regulating of its industry does it, at least in part, to keep competition out.
The left-wing complaint is to blame big business and capitalism. But if you don’t think that sort of thing happens under socialist and communist systems, you don’t know anything about those systems.
Despite a century of anti-corporate rhetoric about the power of corporations, they actually come and go with amazing rapidity (Only 13 percent of firms on the Fortune 500 list in 1955 were there in 2011). But government is forever. The state has the unique ability to protect existing “stakeholders” from threats posed by innovation and competition, whether those stakeholders are businesses or unions, fat cats or philanthropies. That’s where the votes are and where the checks come from.
But progress — material, medical, economic — comes from innovation. Economist Deirdre McCloskey notes that until the 19th century, innovation was a negative word because innovators upset the established order. In her book “Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World,” McCloskey describes how for all of human history, humans lived on about $3 a day, using today’s dollars.
For 200,000 years, the line was flat until around 1800, when a culture that valued innovation spread from England to Europe and the New World. Since then .wealth skyrocketed, thanks to a culture that lets innovators pull up the stakes of existing stakeholders
In Silicon Valley, where government’s touch is light, we can see innovation at work. In health care, education and other areas where the government’s hand is heavy, we see stakeholders holding on for dear life.
Read more: Jonah Goldberg: Want an America that works? Innovate, don't regulate : Wsj
