What's new

Joint air operations to flow from ‘historic’ defence pact between Australia and Japan

Vanguard One

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
-7
Country
Ireland
Location
Ireland
Australia and Japan will immediately look to boost joint military exercises, including complicated air-to-air refuelling operations, after they sign a landmark treaty boosting defence ties.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison and his Japanese counterpart Fumio Kishida will hold a virtual summit on Thursday to ink the defence pact, which will lead to more maritime war games, military aviation exercises and the stationing of troops in each other’s countries.

1641417001700.png

The F-35Joint Strike Fighter could be involved in more aviation exercises between Australia and Japan.CREDIT:JOE ARMAO


The long-awaited Reciprocal Access Agreement, which has been negotiated since 2014, will ensure militaries from both countries will more easily be able to visit each other’s countries and conduct joint exercises.

The finalisation of the deal comes after Australia and Japan have grown increasingly concerned about escalating tensions in the region, including China’s growing militarisation of the South China Sea and its butting up against Tokyo in the East China Sea.

It is the first agreement of its kind Japan has struck with another country, and the most significant since the 1960 Status of Forces Agreement with the United States.

Mr Kishida was due to travel to Australia to sign the final version of the agreement, but was forced to cancel the trip to deal with a worsening COVID-19 outbreak in Japan.

Mr Morrison said the “historic” agreement will mark the “opening of a new chapter of defence and security cooperation between our two countries”.

“This landmark treaty will underpin greater and more complex practical engagement between the Australian Defence Force and the Japanese Self-Defence Forces,” he said.

“It will, for the first time, provide a clear framework for enhanced interoperability and cooperation between our two forces.


“This treaty will be a statement of our two nations’ commitment to work together in meeting the shared strategic security challenges we face and to contribute to a secure and stable Indo-Pacific.”

The agreement is expected to lead to more aviation exercises between the two countries, including air-to-air refuelling operations involving jet fighters such as the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

John Blaxland, professor of international security and intelligence studies at the Australian National University, said it was an “obvious evolution of a deepening security relationship that has been building for more than 20 years”.

“It’s fair to say this is historic, it is something that two decades ago would have probably seemed inconceivable,” he said.

Professor Blaxland said the growing unease about the US’s resolve to remain engaged in the region amid the rise of China, and the desire of Australia and Japan to “collaborate with each other in coaxing America to stay engaged”, has brought the two countries closer together.


“There will probably be some people on the margins who will criticise the agreement,” he said. “But overwhelmingly, across the political spectrum, there is a sense that in light of the surge of ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy and sharp power exercised from China, combined with the growing closeness and obvious overlap of interests between Australia and Japan, that this is a natural progression.”

Mr Morrison and Mr Kishida are also expected to discuss growing instability across the Taiwan Strait, as well as the need to strengthen global bodies such as the World Trade Organisation.

They will also discuss initiatives to boost cooperation on cyber security, quantum and artificial intelligence, as well as shoring up supply chains in areas such as hydrogen.

Later this month the world’s first shipment of liquid hydrogen will be sent to Kobe, Japan, made from brown coal out of Victoria’s Latrobe Valley.

 
Australia and Japan will immediately look to boost joint military exercises, including complicated air-to-air refuelling operations, after they sign a landmark treaty boosting defence ties.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison and his Japanese counterpart Fumio Kishida will hold a virtual summit on Thursday to ink the defence pact, which will lead to more maritime war games, military aviation exercises and the stationing of troops in each other’s countries.

View attachment 806159
The F-35Joint Strike Fighter could be involved in more aviation exercises between Australia and Japan.CREDIT:JOE ARMAO


The long-awaited Reciprocal Access Agreement, which has been negotiated since 2014, will ensure militaries from both countries will more easily be able to visit each other’s countries and conduct joint exercises.

The finalisation of the deal comes after Australia and Japan have grown increasingly concerned about escalating tensions in the region, including China’s growing militarisation of the South China Sea and its butting up against Tokyo in the East China Sea.

It is the first agreement of its kind Japan has struck with another country, and the most significant since the 1960 Status of Forces Agreement with the United States.

Mr Kishida was due to travel to Australia to sign the final version of the agreement, but was forced to cancel the trip to deal with a worsening COVID-19 outbreak in Japan.

Mr Morrison said the “historic” agreement will mark the “opening of a new chapter of defence and security cooperation between our two countries”.

“This landmark treaty will underpin greater and more complex practical engagement between the Australian Defence Force and the Japanese Self-Defence Forces,” he said.

“It will, for the first time, provide a clear framework for enhanced interoperability and cooperation between our two forces.


“This treaty will be a statement of our two nations’ commitment to work together in meeting the shared strategic security challenges we face and to contribute to a secure and stable Indo-Pacific.”

The agreement is expected to lead to more aviation exercises between the two countries, including air-to-air refuelling operations involving jet fighters such as the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

John Blaxland, professor of international security and intelligence studies at the Australian National University, said it was an “obvious evolution of a deepening security relationship that has been building for more than 20 years”.

“It’s fair to say this is historic, it is something that two decades ago would have probably seemed inconceivable,” he said.

Professor Blaxland said the growing unease about the US’s resolve to remain engaged in the region amid the rise of China, and the desire of Australia and Japan to “collaborate with each other in coaxing America to stay engaged”, has brought the two countries closer together.


“There will probably be some people on the margins who will criticise the agreement,” he said. “But overwhelmingly, across the political spectrum, there is a sense that in light of the surge of ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy and sharp power exercised from China, combined with the growing closeness and obvious overlap of interests between Australia and Japan, that this is a natural progression.”

Mr Morrison and Mr Kishida are also expected to discuss growing instability across the Taiwan Strait, as well as the need to strengthen global bodies such as the World Trade Organisation.

They will also discuss initiatives to boost cooperation on cyber security, quantum and artificial intelligence, as well as shoring up supply chains in areas such as hydrogen.

Later this month the world’s first shipment of liquid hydrogen will be sent to Kobe, Japan, made from brown coal out of Victoria’s Latrobe Valley.


So the final QUAD lynchpin is connected. Till now, there were only bilaterals between USA-India, Australia-USA, Australia-India, Japan-India and US-Japan (from the pre-QUAD era).

It is strange how the Japanese lost the submarine tender which then went to France and now back to the US. Their reluctance/inexperience to participate in open tenders has really cost them once-in-a-lifetime sales opportunities with both Aussies and us.

Maybe Japan needs to hire industry consultants to help them manage the tender bidding.
 
So the final QUAD lynchpin is connected. Till now, there were only bilaterals between USA-India, Australia-USA, Australia-India, Japan-India and US-Japan (from the pre-QUAD era).

It is strange how the Japanese lost the submarine tender which then went to France and now back to the US. Their reluctance/inexperience to participate in open tenders has really cost them once-in-a-lifetime sales opportunities with both Aussies and us.

Maybe Japan needs to hire industry consultants to help them manage the tender bidding.

Quad is dead as India opposed converting it into a security alliance.

US, Australia and Japan are moving ahead without India.
 
Quad is dead as India opposed converting it into a security alliance.

US, Australia, and Japan are moving ahead without India.

Some clarifications to your comment:

  1. QUAD was never a security pact but a political pact. The premise of the agreement was on the basis of following the laws of the seas and supporting regional countries in national disasters like the 2005 and 2011 tsunamis.
  2. The agreements mentioned between Japan and Australia are similar to the existing agreements long in place between India and the other three countries on a bilateral basis. How do you think the militaries of the 4 countries have been training multilaterally and bilaterally at the same time?
  3. Japan-US, UK-US, and Australia-US are already in a security pact since WW2. AUKUS is a military pact while Japan is not a part of the AUKUS. However, the US is committed to Japan's defense when required due to earlier commitments.
 
Some clarifications to your comment:

  1. QUAD was never a security pact but a political pact. The premise of the agreement was on the basis of following the laws of the seas and supporting regional countries in national disasters like the 2005 and 2011 tsunamis.
  2. The agreements mentioned between Japan and Australia are similar to the existing agreements long in place between India and the other three countries on a bilateral basis. How do you think the militaries of the 4 countries have been training multilaterally and bilaterally at the same time?
  3. Japan-US, UK-US, and Australia-US are already in a security pact since WW2. AUKUS is a military pact while Japan is not a part of the AUKUS. However, the US is committed to Japan's defense when required due to earlier commitments.

LOL

China & the US are bed fellows when it comes to UNCLOS.

Quad was meant to confront China but India did not fully commit hence Quad was replaced by AUKUS.

AUKUS+Japan are going to confront China leaving India out.


China Will Never Respect the U.S. Over the South China Sea. Here's Why

 
LOL

China & the US are bedfellows when it comes to UNCLOS.

Quad was meant to confront China but India did not fully commit hence Quad was replaced by AUKUS.

AUKUS+Japan are going to confront China leaving India out.


China Will Never Respect the U.S. Over the South China Sea. Here's Why


China does not even consider UNCLOS as a legitimate rule of law, case and point their dismissal of the International Court's ruling in the Philippines. Some bedfellows.

QUAD was never started with the idea of countering China but eventually became so, and never militarily. This is the perception you have but just take a look at any QUAD paper or discussion with the ministers of the respective countries and you will clear your misconception. AUKUS is purely a military alliance of countries that are already in an alliance with each other in different agreements. NATO and ANZUS agreements. AUKUS does not include Japan either.

I don't know where you made that inference, just because of this agreement. Australia and Japan have been increasing their military cooperation right from the last 4-5 years, when Australia initially invited Japan to participate in the submarine tender (before it went to France and later the USA.

Leaving India out is your wishful thinking, buddy. Let's keep fantasy away from facts. The term is Indo-Pacific for a damn reason.
 
The term is Indo-Pacific for a damn reason.

LOL Again

The term Indo-Pacific has nothing to do with India but everything do with the US.

Indo-Pacific was created to reorganize the US Military commands to confront China.
China does not even consider UNCLOS as a legitimate rule of law, case and point their dismissal of the International Court's ruling in the Philippines. Some bedfellows.

You can expect the same from the US too.
 
Back
Top Bottom